Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

 

Guys,

 

Regretful sale, but the time has come have lost the interest in this car, have owned it for 7 years.

 

1997 build gtr in midnight purple, vspec

 

Not in showroom condition

 

16-000 thousand k's all country kms since I owned car, brought in 2010 with 90k on the clock,

 

Has a broken front lip where I hit a rabbit at night, a slight crack in bumper when hit the rabbit

 

Got a hole in rear turbo gasket exhaust side

 

Still has custom plates " R33gtr"

 

Start price @ $20 thousand, but make an offer, really want this car gone.. serious offers will be considered.

 

I know it's not in the best conition but at the end of the day it is still a series 3 gtr in midnight purple.

 

Will try get more photos up

 

Thanks jake

*phone number removed*

 

Thanks guys

IMG_0209.jpgIMG_0205.jpg

 

 

Edited by niZmO_Man
removed mobile number
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/471449-r33gtr-series-3-need-gone/
Share on other sites

On 31/07/2017 at 1:48 PM, wytnte said:

Guys,
 
Regretful sale, but the time has come have lost the interest in this car, have owned it for 7 years.
 
1997 build gtr in midnight purple, vspec
 
Not in showroom condition
 
16-000 thousand k's all country kms since I owned car, brought in 2010 with 90k on the clock,
 
Has a broken front lip where I hit a rabbit at night, a slight crack in bumper when hit the rabbit
 
Got a hole in rear turbo gasket exhaust side
 
Still has custom plates " R33gtr"
 
Start price @ $20 thousand, but make an offer, really want this car gone.. serious offers will be considered.
 
I know it's not in the best conition but at the end of the day it is still a series 3 gtr in midnight purple.
 
Will try get more photos up
 
Thanks jake

 
Thanks guys
IMG_0209.thumb.jpg.96f725d80e2cab9e33ea0726d3f5cc1a.jpgIMG_0205.thumb.jpg.ab8f4584c05835b0a47f20fdf9b1aa7b.jpg
 


IMG_0207.jpgIMG_0030.jpg

4 minutes ago, wytnte said:

Can we get this removed? I'm using my phone and can't work it out?

Thanks for all the interest guys.
 

I'll edit out your phone number, but the thread stays for archival purposes.

On 8/2/2017 at 10:34 AM, admS15 said:

More like, fairly priced for the overall condition. Definitely good buying and cheap in the current jdm craze climate.

IMO cars that are "fairly" priced don't sell in a matter of hours...particularly 20+ year old classics...even a couple of days is quick. I say underpriced because another 2-3k on this would still have moved it on in less than a week.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
    • Nah, that is hella wrong. If I do a simple linear between 150°C (0.407v) and 50°C (2.98v) I get the formula Temperature = -38.8651*voltage + 165.8181 It is perfectly correct at 50 and 150, but it is as much as 20° out in the region of 110°C, because the actual data is significantly non-linear there. It is no more than 4° out down at the lowest temperatures, but is is seriously shit almost everywhere. I cannot believe that the instruction is to do a 2 point linear fit. I would say the method I used previously would have to be better.
    • When I said "wiring diagram", I meant the car's wiring diagram. You need to understand how and when 12V appears on certain wires/terminals, when 0V is allowed to appear on certain wires/terminals (which is the difference between supply side switching, and earth side switching), for the way that the car is supposed to work without the immobiliser. Then you start looking for those voltages in the appropriate places at the appropriate times (ie, relay terminals, ECU terminals, fuel pump terminals, at different ignition switch positions, and at times such as "immediately after switching to ON" and "say, 5-10s after switching to ON". You will find that you are not getting what you need when and where you need it, and because you understand what you need and when, from working through the wiring diagram, you can then likely work out why you're not getting it. And that will lead you to the mess that has been made of the associated wires around the immobiliser. But seriously, there is no way that we will be able to find or lead you to the fault from here. You will have to do it at the car, because it will be something f**ked up, and there are a near infinite number of ways for it to be f**ked up. The wiring diagram will give you wire colours and pin numbers and so you can do continuity testing and voltage/time probing and start to work out what is right and what is wrong. I can only close my eyes and imagine a rat's nest of wiring under the dash. You can actually see and touch it.
×
×
  • Create New...