Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

rb25det gearbox on rb30det -

Hi guys,

my r33 that my brother and I converted to rb30det was tuned over the weekend and we installed a heavy duty organic clutch hoping to have that as the weak point to not put so much strain on the driveline and it's getting bent over anywhere above about 420bhp so basically were going to take it out and install the triple plate I've got for it but I'm concerned having a direct clutch how much power the gearbox and diff (both in good nick but both standard) are going to be able to stand up against. Ive been told the gearbox is the weak point and will break sooner rather than later once you get over 400-450bhp area especially with the triple plate clutch so if anyone could clarify or correct that I would appreciate it. It will mostly be a street/weekend car but it will definitely see the drag strip a few times and maybe Wakefield so if I go with the triple plate how far can I turn it up before I'm going to break everything behind it? Anyone have any alternatives? Car made 424hp on wastegate pressure before the clutch started slipping 

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/471896-rb25det-gearbox-on-rb30det/
Share on other sites

Fitting an even heavier clutch is going to improve your chances of breaking the gearbox or other driveline component. The clutch needs to act like a fuse - it needs to slip before more power is transmitted further down the drive train.

You surely need to strengthen all the other driveline components before you consider upgrading the clutch (fuse). Otherwise, it will be like using a 6" nail as a (house) fuse, and then wondering why the kettle blows up.

Yeah nah.

There are a thousand clutch options, certainly not a single organic or a triple plate.

 

Call a clutch place. Talk to them.

Don't expect a clutch to really protect the driveline if making big power. The clutch job is to hold the power, not to protect. The gearbox's are not that bad.

 

Tyres are the other weak link that protects the driveline. Keep in mind that slicks or semis increase pressure on the gearbox as you improve grip.

Aside from wear through failed or faulty bearings, or some sort of pre-existing structural damage to the cogs, catastrophic gearbox failure / stripping teeth usually occurs from two things: 1. too much torque transferred through the box with resistance at the other end, e.g. lots of engine power and the tyres are gripping, or 2. too much torque instantaneously transferred / shocked through the box, e.g. dumping clutch or harsh pick up.

So boxes do have their limits for what they handle power wise, but it goes a long way to treating the box kindly. You can baby around a drag car with a T5 gearbox or you can kill a Tremec TKO with a stock LS1 and horrible driving. If you're insistent on running a certain power level then I would talk to a clutch specialist like NPC, tell them your power and application (street or strip) and they will sell you a clutch that suits. But be prepared, down the track you may need a stronger box.

Thanks for the feedback guys, I'll make a call to npc tomorrow and see what they say, as far as strengthening components what are my options if I want to keep it h pattern ? 2 or 3 speeds auto is completely out of the question and I haven't got 20k to spend on a sequential 

Strengthened gearset put in existing box, e.g. OSGiken, PAR or PPG. Do some research though, as there are issues with certain brands and I've also heard of breakages with all of them. But they will certainly be stronger than the standard gearset. You can get these in dog engagement or synchro and straight cut or helical. Recommend synchro and helical for street car. You may realistically only need the first three gears as 4th won't break and 5th is for cruising.

The gearset alone can be anywhere from 3k - 7k (been a while since I've tried to source one) and you'll need to recondition the gearbox it's going into, so budget another $1200-$1500 on top of that.

Keep an eye out, second hand strengthened boxes pop up from time to time.

This is where power starts getting expensive :)

If the tyres are mega sticky third gear will go eventually, I have done this three times doing anything from simple changes launching to just a light clutch pump. I run a direct twin plate so there is zero slip.

Slip is annoying as hell especially when you've built the thing to have power.

From memory the transfer case design had something to do with it; creating more pressure on third. In weak gearboxes, 2nd is usually the most likely to blow because we spend the most time in it and it's the "thrash" gear. Variety of other reasons for third to go in a GTR/GTS-T box, including:

- lower boost in 1st gear (at least on factory vehicles)

- second more likely to wheelspin than third (wheelspin protects the cog itself, but not the gearbox bearings!)

- physically smaller cog on third than 1st and 2nd

- taller ratio with more rolling and air resistance at higher speeds

- as above, longer time opportunity to exert pressure/forces on cog

- 4th gear would probably do the same if it wasn't a simple locking of input shaft to output shaft (creating the 1:1 ratio)

For reasons above, 5th and 6th overdrive are the gears most likely to blow when towing, which is why you always tow heavy loads in 4th. Incredibly rare to blow 4th in a gearbox because it would take forces capable of snapping the input or output shaft itself.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yeah, that's fine**. But the numbers you came up with are just wrong. Try it for yourself. Put in any voltage from the possible range and see what result you get. You get nonsense. ** When I say "fine", I mean, it's still shit. The very simple linear formula (slope & intercept) is shit for a sensor with a non-linear response. This is the curve, from your data above. Look at the CURVE! It's only really linear between about 30 and 90 °C. And if you used only that range to define a curve, it would be great. But you would go more and more wrong as you went to higher temps. And that is why the slope & intercept found when you use 50 and 150 as the end points is so bad halfway between those points. The real curve is a long way below the linear curve which just zips straight between the end points, like this one. You could probably use the same slope and a lower intercept, to move that straight line down, and spread the error out. But you would 5-10°C off in a lot of places. You'd need to say what temperature range you really wanted to be most right - say, 100 to 130, and plop the line closest to teh real curve in that region, which would make it quite wrong down at the lower temperatures. Let me just say that HPTuners are not being realistic in only allowing for a simple linear curve. 
    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
    • Nah, that is hella wrong. If I do a simple linear between 150°C (0.407v) and 50°C (2.98v) I get the formula Temperature = -38.8651*voltage + 165.8181 It is perfectly correct at 50 and 150, but it is as much as 20° out in the region of 110°C, because the actual data is significantly non-linear there. It is no more than 4° out down at the lowest temperatures, but is is seriously shit almost everywhere. I cannot believe that the instruction is to do a 2 point linear fit. I would say the method I used previously would have to be better.
×
×
  • Create New...