Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

This is FICs calculator .

https://fuelinjectorclinic.com/flow-calculator

For shits 'n giggles I entered 670 wheel Hp at 43.5 base pressure @ 85% DC and for 4 and 6 cylinders (injectors) . It came up with around 1860cc and 1250cc for 4 and 6 .

I think I prefer ASNUs ideas about making up their own diffuser plate cap fitting than the exposed ball valve . They have a version of the 1650 or whatever EV14 and you'd think it would break up the spray a bit better than a bare ball .

 

 

Edited by discopotato03
On 10/02/2018 at 6:47 PM, Mick_o said:

My 1300s are the same. 

You went way too small if you'r aiming for 500kw Pete.

Piggy is at 87 or so % duty cycle with 1700s at 486kw. 

74% mate ?

6 hours ago, Piggaz said:

Stock I’m fairly sure. Would have to confirm that though mate.

High chance that's stock pressure Paul, if they were at 3.5 or even 4 bar you would be at like 50~60% DC haha

Downside to higher pressure, the car won't idle too nicely on 98RON as the IPW is so low - but then again as Paul would say it's commuter fuel.

28 minutes ago, Dose Pipe Sutututu said:

High chance that's stock pressure Paul, if they were at 3.5 or even 4 bar you would be at like 50~60% DC haha

Downside to higher pressure, the car won't idle too nicely on 98RON as the IPW is so low - but then again as Paul would say it's commuter fuel.

True. But then you could just size injectors correctly and not flog the ass out of the pumps.

1 hour ago, Piggaz said:

True. But then you could just size injectors correctly and not flog the ass out of the pumps.

Also depends on how much boost you want to play with - all a balancing act at the end of the day.

ID1700X if you baller 1550cc Bosch Motorsports if you're willing and 1250cc modified Bosch injectors if you're a bit strapped for cash lol

  • 1 year later...

Hi all , old thread I know but I need some info on the injectors that will be in next years Ford Mustang Shelby GT500 .

The engine is a 5.2L four cam supercharged V8 , named Predator , and surprisingly it will still have port fuel injection .

The largest current GT500 Shelby V8 injectors I know of are 630cc/~60lb Bosch EV14 mid length - 0280 158 298 .

I'm guessing that an around 750 Hp supercharged V8 would need 700 + cc injectors assuming they use one per cylinder .

They should be interesting because anything that can meet current emissions regs would have to have good atomisation which could be difficult to achieve in a biggish injector .

I have searched but not much info available that I could find .

Thanks in advance , cheers from Adrian .

  • 9 months later...

I never did get back on this , the 2020 Mustang Shelby GT500 injectors I believe are Bosch 0280 158 395 .

From memory they are rated at 650cc . Unfortunately they are a full length EV14 so not much use to us with OE RB25 type inlet manifolds .

Cheers A .  

On 14/02/2018 at 1:57 PM, Piggaz said:

True. But then you could just size injectors correctly and not flog the ass out of the pumps.

Old comment, but never saw this and seeing as the thread has been pumped I feel compelled to address it haha.  Running 3.5bar or so base fuel pressure is so far from flogging the ass out of pumps.   It makes way more sense running 3.5-4 bar base pressure on sensible sized injectors than running CNG based or other nugget things that a lot of people do to try and get sensible fuel flow for E85.    It's real common these days for factory cars even to run that range rail pressure, turbo Falcons all run 4bar base.   

Most of these "Bosch 1700" etc injectors don't even match the claimed flow rate at 3bar differential pressure, the likes of ID1700x at 3.5bar will flow an extraordinary amount of power and if everything is specced correctly there will be 0 issues at that fuel pressure.

Edited by Lithium

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I know why it happened and I’m embarrassed to say but I was testing the polarity of one of the led bulb to see which side was positive with a 12v battery and that’s when it decided to fry hoping I didn’t damage anything else
    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
×
×
  • Create New...