Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

OK, bad news.

Cylinders 1 & 5 compression tested at 60psi...

They are going to be bore scoped today, but it's probably cracked ringlands - the pistons are stock RB26.

Why oh why didn't I forge the damn thing from the beginning!

 

Anyway, this is happening sooner than I would have liked, but as the engine needs to come out, I might as well go RB30 with a single. :8_laughing:

EFR8374 A/R 1.05 still a good choice? Twin 38mm, or 44mm gates?

2 hours ago, Jazzadub said:

OK, bad news.

Cylinders 1 & 5 compression tested at 60psi...

They are going to be bore scoped today, but it's probably cracked ringlands - the pistons are stock RB26.

Why oh why didn't I forge the damn thing from the beginning!

 

Anyway, this is happening sooner than I would have liked, but as the engine needs to come out, I might as well go RB30 with a single. :8_laughing:

EFR8374 A/R 1.05 still a good choice? Twin 38mm, or 44mm gates?

I ran the same turbo on my stock NEO and it was a good choice! The extra capacity will be killer!

If you are going 3L i would nearly go a size up for shits and giggles :laugh:

I run twin 40mm turbosmart gates!

I think long term I will go for a EFR9180 1.05 A/R

However, in the short term, I am wondering how well the RB30 would work with the GT2860R-9 turbos?

I imagine it will come on boost earlier, however it will run out of puff earlier as well, and we would need to make sure the turbos didn't overspeed? Any thoughts?

I would honestly sell the -9 and just get a nice single, if budget is a concern look at the GTW3884R range. Plenty of Supra boys on them making 450kW with decent boost response. Also their BB version is only a few hundred bucks more than their journal bearing turbo.

Interesting option, but if I go single, I don't want to compromise.

I'm just wondering if the RB26/30 + GT2860R-9 combination would be usable for a few months, allowing me to attend track days etc. while I continue saving for a full turbo replacement etc.

The money you spend tuning the 9s can be put towards the single so save money and only tune once. ?

Be a great lil saver and drop the $$$ on the EFR you won't regret it.

Remember you're taking a big step going to 8374 from 9s so you're talking a new fuel system, injectors etc new intake and exhaust setup so strip it all down and sell off as much as you can to help fund the new build ?

The 9s will probably die pretty quick with a 3L blowing all that extra hot air up their ass' so sell them to contribute to single as they are worth more fully operational! Hell even 5s on 2.8L & 3L have died premature deaths in my experience so honestly dont even go there with the 9s mate. 

Twin 38mm gates will be fine also ?

Edited by Mick_o
  • Like 1

I'm just fitting a 26/30 in a cefiro. It's an r34 head that's been reco'd,  stock low km rb30 bottom end with head studs and new oil pump. 

I have a 9174 ewg 1.05 and twin 40 mm gates I was going to put on my gtr. 

Should I fit this to the cefiro now and buy another one for gtr later?

Is it overkill for a stock bottom end  as I was thinking 20 psi Max on this combo on p98 as I have the fuel system now to support 550 whp? 

Not sure how far to push the 2630.

4 hours ago, Griffin said:

I'm just fitting a 26/30 in a cefiro.

I have a 9174 ewg 1.05 and twin 40 mm gates I was going to put on my gtr. 

Should I fit this to the cefiro now and buy another one for gtr later?

Is it overkill for a stock bottom end  as I was thinking 20 psi Max on this combo on p98 as I have the fuel system now to support 550 whp? 

Not sure how far to push the 2630.

Fit it up to the Cefiro donk.  See how the fuel system copes - presuming you'll be spending on a decent fuel pressure sensor and monitor fuel system performance.  

If you ran a turbo speed sensor, you could probably evaluate fuel flow requirements vs airflow as a function of turbo speed.  And have a lot of information about what the GTR would require.

2wd Cefiro can only put down so much torque, I'd look at that aspect of how you want to tune the engine.  The two engine breakers will be rpm, and detonation.  If you're fuel system limited then you're not likely to run enough boost to create cylinder pressures that will bend rods.

I've got 750cc injectors, haltech and suitable pump, intercooler and exhaust. Was thinking 500 whp would be enough in a light cefiro.  Should I wind in boost til the injectors are near their limit? 

I accidentally posted previous post here. Sorry to OP. I've moved it to efr thread. Maybe he may find it informative none the less.

 

  • 2 weeks later...

No worries!

This is what I've decided to go with at the moment:

RIPS Forged RB30 Short Block
Sinco RB26/30 Turbo Manifold
Turbosmart 60mm Wastegate
Xspurt 1600cc Injectors
EFR9180 Turbo

 

Already put a deposit down on the block and purchased the turbo manifold!

Currently deciding what I do with the head.

Tossing up between the following Kelford camshafts:
I want early spool as it's a big turbo, wide powerband, drivable, low maintenance, reliable.

182-E
280 10.5mm
Good for 3.0L, could be too aggressive and lose bottom end?

182-S
272mm 10.5mm
Good for E85

182-C
272 10mm
Good for quick spool up, but would it be ok with a 3.0L?

 

5 hours ago, Jazzadub said:
 
 
 
 

 

Tossing up between the following Kelford camshafts:
I want early spool as it's a big turbo, wide powerband, drivable, low maintenance, reliable.

182-E
280 10.5mm
Good for 3.0L, could be too aggressive and lose bottom end?

182-S
272mm 10.5mm
Good for E85

182-C
272 10mm
Good for quick spool up, but would it be ok with a 3.0L?

 

Two suggestions come to mind:

1. Kick off a thread with this specific question

2. Chase an opinion/advice from Kelford and let us know what they say.  It's their product after all.

Given that you want early spool and the turbo is a big breathing unit, I'd think the smallest 182-C would be the best choice of those three options.

  • Like 1

As Dale said ditch the high duration cams if you want response. Youd be surprised how far you can go with stock cams. Id also be looking for bigger injectors for a 9180 if you're planning on really leaning on it as i can almost guarantee you will run out of fuel. 

An 8374 on a 2.8L at 122K out of its 127K rpm limit on E85 is over 80% duty cycle with ID1700's and 490kw. 

38 minutes ago, Mick_o said:

Youd be surprised how far you can go with stock cams. 

 

+1.  This makes a lot of sense.  Capitalise on the flow capabilities of the turbo.  It's hardly going to be weak up higher.  

Spend the saved money on engineering a capable fuel system from front to back.  Look at pics provided by Piggaz.

On 1/19/2018 at 10:31 AM, Jazzadub said:

I think long term I will go for a EFR9180 1.05 A/R

However, in the short term, I am wondering how well the RB30 would work with the GT2860R-9 turbos?

I imagine it will come on boost earlier, however it will run out of puff earlier as well, and we would need to make sure the turbos didn't overspeed? Any thoughts?

 

In the UAE,  I had a 350z with a 2630 in it,  was fully forged with some unknown camshafts,  it had GT2860R-9 turbos on it,  and i frigging loved it!

It will work fine trust me =)

350z.jpg

Im assuming you didn't have the car long? 

If 5's aren't living long on 2.8s & 3L's i highly doubt 9s will live long. He's better off selling them in working order and putting his money into the new setup & only paying for 1 tune. Its $2.5K in the bank for bigger better things ?

On 30/01/2018 at 9:15 AM, Jazzadub said:

No worries!

This is what I've decided to go with at the moment:

RIPS Forged RB30 Short Block
Sinco RB26/30 Turbo Manifold
Turbosmart 60mm Wastegate
Xspurt 1600cc Injectors
EFR9180 Turbo

 

Already put a deposit down on the block and purchased the turbo manifold!

Currently deciding what I do with the head.

Tossing up between the following Kelford camshafts:
I want early spool as it's a big turbo, wide powerband, drivable, low maintenance, reliable.

182-E
280 10.5mm
Good for 3.0L, could be too aggressive and lose bottom end?

182-S
272mm 10.5mm
Good for E85

182-C
272 10mm
Good for quick spool up, but would it be ok with a 3.0L?

 

If you plan on squeezing the 9180 up there close to full turbine speed, YOU WILL NEED the 1.45 housing. 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I've got the rear ones, they're certainly beefy. I need to take them to my driveshaft guru to check over, he's very fussy about the quality of components so I'll let you know if they are made of cheese by a blind man.   Are you in Australia? A mate just had a set of EN26 shafts made for his K20 Lotus by our fabricator which were quite cheap (compared to Driveshaft Shop) so if you can procure the CV's and draw what you need he'd make them for ~$800 for the pair.
    • Had I known the diff between R32 and R33 suspension I would have R33 suspension. That ship has sailed so I'm doing my best to replicate a drop spindle without spending $4k on a Billet one.
    • OEM suspension starts to bind as soon as the car gets away from stock height. I locked in the caster and camber before cutting off the kingpin. I then let the upright down in a natural (unbound) state before re-attaching it. Now it moves freely in bump and droop relative to the new ride height. My plan is to add GKTech arms before the car is finished so I can dial camber and caster further. It will be fine. This isn't rocket science. Caster looks good, camber is good, upper arm doesn't cause crazy gain and it is now closer to the stock angle and bump steer checks out. Send it.
    • Pay careful attention to the kinematics of that upper arm. The bloody things don't work properly even on a normal stock height R32. Nissan really screwed the pooch on that one. The fixes have included changing the hole locations on the bracket to change the angle of the inner pivot (which was fairly successful but usually makes it impossible to install or remove the arm without unbolting the bracket from the tower, which sucks) and various swivelling upper arm designs. ALL the swivelling upper arm designs that look like a capital I (with serifs) suck. All of them. Some of them are in fact terribly unsafe. Even the best one of them (the old UAS design) shat itself in short order on my car. The only upper arm that works as advertised and is pretty safe is the GKTech one. But it is high maintenance on a street car. I'm guessing that a 600HP car as (stupidly, IMO) low as you are going is not going to be a regular driver. So the maintenance issues on suspension parts are probably not going to be a problem. But you really must make sure that however your fairly drastically modded suspension ends up, that the upper arms swing through an arc that wants to keep the inner and outer bolts parallel. If the outer end travels through an arc that makes that end's bolt want to skew away from parallel with the inner bolt, you will build up enormous binding and compressing forces in the bushes, chew them out and hate life. The suspension compliance can actually be dominated by the bush binding, not the spring rate! It may be the case that even something like the GKTech arm won't work if your suspension kinematics become too weird, courtesy of all the cut and shut going on. Although you at least say there's no binding now, so maybe you're OK. Seeing as you're in the build phase, you could consider using R33/4 type upper arms (either that actual arm, OEM or aftermarket) or any similar wishbone designed to suit your available space, so alleviate the silliness of the R32 design. Then you can locate your inner pivots to provide the correct kinematics (camber gain on compression, etc).
    • The frontend wouldn't go low enough because the coilover was max low and the upper control arm would collapse into itself and potentially bottom out in the strut tower. I made a brace and cut off the kingpin and then moved the upright down 1.25" and welded. i still have to finish but this gives an idea. Now I can have a normal 3.25" of shock travel and things aren't binding. I'm also dropping the lower arm and tie rod 1.25".
×
×
  • Create New...