Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi there.

Which will be better for street forged RB26? Botch turbo's are for 750[crank]hp - my power goal is 650-700hp on 93octane. GTX3076R will have 0.83 T3 twinscroll  and GTX3576R probably 0.61 T3 twinscroll. I hear GTX3576R spool better than -5. I need the fastest possible spool for that power level. Even i prefer 650hp over much lagged 700.

It's true GTX gen 2 spool faster than gen 1?

BTW how realistic is G25-660 with 650hp @ RB26?

 

 

Edited by joe89
9 hours ago, joe89 said:

Which will be better for street forged RB26? Botch turbo's are for 750[crank]hp - 

3076 Maybe in Americaland but not in Australia

9 hours ago, joe89 said:

GTX3076R will have 0.83 T3 twinscroll

No, too small. 1.01 required. Also they don't do a T3 twinscroll as far as i am aware.

 

9 hours ago, joe89 said:

 GTX3576R probably 0.61 T3 twinscroll

See above

9 hours ago, joe89 said:

I hear GTX3576R spool better than -5. I need the fastest possible spool for that power level. 

Yes a 3576 should be much much better than -5

9 hours ago, joe89 said:

It's true GTX gen 2 spool faster than gen 1?

In my experience is much of a muchness

9 hours ago, joe89 said:

BTW how realistic is G25-660 with 650hp @ RB26?

Less likely than the 3576 doing it

46 minutes ago, iruvyouskyrine said:

No, too small. 1.01 required. Also they don't do a T3 twinscroll as far as i am aware.

Not as a full complete kit, you need to buy the supercore and order the rear housing separately :)

I'm still waiting on my divided 1.01 T3 rear housing from Sparesbox, however I have a nice GTX3576R Gen 2 supercore at home.

20190214_075228.thumb.jpg.7cef5a333251d96e82a5ef869e69118b.jpg

  • Like 3

Oh wow, I've clearly missed some developments with the Dose Pipe beast - nice, be interesting to see how that goes!  Big hot side, any reason for going the 1.01 instead of the .83 housing?

Wanted the car to be linear and not snap necks, although my mates have been telling me to go with the 0.83 TS housing.

Let's see, if I'm not overly impressed might have to drop it down a housing. But my gut feel (based loosely on pure broscience) tells me it will work out pretty well.

5 minutes ago, Dose Pipe Sutututu said:

Wanted the car to be linear and not snap necks, although my mates have been telling me to go with the 0.83 TS housing.

Let's see, if I'm not overly impressed might have to drop it down a housing. But my gut feel (based loosely on pure broscience) tells me it will work out pretty well.

Should have got a 42r and left the 35 for the response losers lol

1 minute ago, Dose Pipe Sutututu said:

Wanted the car to be linear and not snap necks, although my mates have been telling me to go with the 0.83 TS housing.

Let's see, if I'm not overly impressed might have to drop it down a housing. But my gut feel (based loosely on pure broscience) tells me it will work out pretty well.

Keen to hear how you find it.  I'd have gone with the .83 as well, but it will be a very interesting setup to see how works as it's going to be something a bit different :)

19 minutes ago, WantGTR said:

Should have got a 42r and left the 35 for the response losers lol

Salem Habib, wallah don't be worried, I'm not gonna run a speed sensor on my turbo and send it :)

Race you soon bruh.

20 minutes ago, Lithium said:

Keen to hear how you find it.  I'd have gone with the .83 as well, but it will be a very interesting setup to see how works as it's going to be something a bit different :)

I've been stalking the Evolution M forums, as well as some random Russian YouTube videos with the same turbo on Chasers albeit Gen 1.

Back to back from 0.83 to 1.01 there was a bee's dick difference in response however a bit more top end. 

28 minutes ago, Dose Pipe Sutututu said:

I've been stalking the Evolution M forums, as well as some random Russian YouTube videos with the same turbo on Chasers albeit Gen 1.

Back to back from 0.83 to 1.01 there was a bee's dick difference in response however a bit more top end. 

Oh wow, I've missed that one - been following 240Z's experiments which have been pretty cool but I've not seen him try the .83.  In his testing the 1.01 GTX3576R was real laggy from memory, he went to a GTX3582R with the ATP T4 1.06 housing (which actually have a much smaller cross section than the Garrett T3 divided housings, so actually downsized despite the a/r)  and picked up spool.

Who did the .83 to 1.01 comparison?

Noone did the comparison, but from amalgamating different results from various results it appears going to a larger housing (of course keeping it TS) people have lost not much boost respons vs. RPM however however tends not to nose over.

I saw those results from 240Z going from a 0.82 OS to a 1.06 TS and actually getting better response.

I got the whole GTX3576 idea from the Evolution and WRX guys, so hopefully once it's all running we can get some data.

  • Like 1
2 hours ago, Dose Pipe Sutututu said:

I saw those results from 240Z going from a 0.82 OS to a 1.06 TS and actually getting better response.

I got the whole GTX3576 idea from the Evolution and WRX guys, so hopefully once it's all running we can get some data.

Ahh yeah, that's one of those big cases where "a/r" is a bit of a flawed measurement as you kinda need the "area" value as well to get a real gauge of the scale being dealt with.  A 1.06a/r T4 twin scroll housing from ATP was pretty equivalent in effective size/flow to the .82a/r T3 Garrett open housing, but more efficient due to being a divided housing so despite being a bigger number - it wasn't much "bigger" in effect, if at all... but more efficient being divided so still flowed a bit more but also at no real cost to response.  Arguably better transient response, a mate did the same conversion (.82 T3 open GT35R to a 1.06 T4 divided one) and the thing felt much better on the road.

Garrett's T3 divided housings actually are much more "equivalent" to the open housings, so if you want the divided equivalent of a .82a/r T3 open housing then you get a .83a/r T3 divided housing - as opposed to going up an a/r like you would with some options. 

Basically the .83a/r Garrett T3 twin scroll housing is much more comparable to the ATP 1.06a/r T4 housings used in those comparisons than the 1.01 is - though realistically its a bit hard to compare.   One thing is for sure, you're not likely to choke your compressor :D

Anyway, I've been looking forward to seeing a GTX3576R on an RB25 and know you'll have done it well so very much look forward to seeing how it goes, kudos for trying some cool shit out :)    Hopefully the result ends up driving the way you want it to anyway, and it's worth knowing that if on the off chance the spool isn't as good as you were hoping - you can try going down a size in exhaust housing and are unlikely to lose too much up high.

 

 

Edited by Lithium
25 minutes ago, Lithium said:

Anyway, I've been looking forward to seeing a GTX3576R on an RB25 and know you'll have done it well so very much look forward to seeing how it goes, kudos for trying some cool shit out :)    Hopefully the result ends up driving the way you want it to anyway, and it's worth knowing that if on the off chance the spool isn't as good as you were hoping - you can try going down a size in exhaust housing and are unlikely to lose too much up high.

That's the best part, just swap housing no fab work and off I go again :)

 

26 minutes ago, Lithium said:

A 1.06a/r T4 twin scroll housing from ATP was pretty equivalent in effective size/flow to the .82a/r T3 Garrett open housing, but more efficient due to being a divided housing so despite being a bigger number - it wasn't much "bigger" in effect, if at all

Interesting to know that, I never really looked deeper into the overall surface area and volume of the housings.

26 minutes ago, Dose Pipe Sutututu said:

Interesting to know that, I never really looked deeper into the overall surface area and volume of the housings.

I kinda wish I made more measurements when I had one of the ATP ones in my hands, they're pretty unusual to come by these days.  

  • 3 months later...

Update time, albeit a bit dataless lol.

Just got the car back tonight and I can tell you I've made the right choice with the twin scroll GTX3576 Gen 2 with 1.01 rear housing.

Because I decided to remove all the after market gauges in my car (boost, afr, fuel temp, ethanol %) I had no idea what was really going on without a laptop.

So drove it around with 6 month old E85 in the tank and with the same timing map as before with only the turbo on gate pressure (1 bar) and it exceeded my expectations to simply put it.

At 3k rpm you could hear the turbo working by 4k rpm it was clearly on and moving. Transient response by feel was decent too.

I'll plug up over the weekend and produce some useful logs :)

Only think I can think of that's holding back the setup now would be the FMIC ($100 eBay HDi special).

10 hours ago, Dose Pipe Sutututu said:

Just got the car back tonight and I can tell you I've made the right choice with the twin scroll GTX3576 Gen 2 with 1.01 rear housing.

So drove it around with 6 month old E85 in the tank and with the same timing map as before with only the turbo on gate pressure (1 bar) and it exceeded my expectations to simply put it.

At 3k rpm you could hear the turbo working by 4k rpm it was clearly on and moving. Transient response by feel was decent too.

I'll plug up over the weekend and produce some useful logs :)

That sounds real promising, if nothing else - if it is doing what makes you happy then that's perfect as it should have plenty of hotside flow.

In regards to some of the a/r stuff above, I'm not quite at the "eat hat" stage but I am prepared to if it comes to it - the data Garrett provide on the turbine housing flow stuff is real ambiguous... you "liked" my comment in the Hypergear thread relating to someone I know losing a fair bit of power going from an open .63 to a divided .61 Garrett hot side so you can see where this is coming from. 

On further investigation Garrett don't specify in their turbine flow maps if their ".61" turbine flow maps are for open or divided,  and perhaps they are only talking about the open housing and they aren't actually providing any flow info for the divided ones.  I know one source definitely implied it was the divided ones but I am starting to question that, I've tried putting word out to the right channels to get clarification on that but so far no joy but it is something which would be VERY helpful to have.   Andrew Hawkins made quite a lot of power with the divided .83 on his RB26 with the GTX3582R so it seemed reasonable to assume that they aren't shabby.

Either way, if you are happy with the response of the 1.01a/r divided GT3576R Gen2 that is great - the Hypergear you were running before was pretty laggy from memory, but still.... the Gen2 76mm compressor is proven to be capable of a heap of power, so this setup is heading in the direction of delivery some very good goods :)  Nice work, looking forward to data!

To add, the ATR45SAT, although a very capable turbo didn't wake up till about 4500rpm and had pretty much nothing prior. Would have been perfect on a 2.8 or a 3.0L!

The GTX3576 Gen 2, albeit pretty much the same ish size of the Hypergear turbo is on and moving so much sooner. It's day and night difference, also the dose is phenomenal - like a Hans Zimmer concert (he's touring Australia again, so going).

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
On 07/06/2019 at 9:51 AM, Dose Pipe Sutututu said:

To add, the ATR45SAT, although a very capable turbo didn't wake up till about 4500rpm and had pretty much nothing prior. Would have been perfect on a 2.8 or a 3.0L!

The GTX3576 Gen 2, albeit pretty much the same ish size of the Hypergear turbo is on and moving so much sooner. It's day and night difference, also the dose is phenomenal - like a Hans Zimmer concert (he's touring Australia again, so going).

Just a quick note, the ATR45SAT you had was a 5 years old unit, current model is different, result has been updated to dyno section. More developments are underway.

And result to share:

GTX3076R Gen 2 maxed on a built Rb25det Neo on 26psi of boost, externally gated on E85 fuel.

 

59709273_1791193424315303_3772521770397990912_n (1).jpg

Edited by hypergear
  • Like 3

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Back again. I returned to Japan in Jul/Aug to spend time with the car on my birthday and remind myself what all the sacrifice and compromise is for. It happened to line up with the monthly morning meet in Okutama, which I have been wanting to go to for a long time. It's a unique event at a unique spot with really rare, interesting, and quirky cars. It's where all the oldheads and OGs gather. The nighttime scene at DKF certainly has its place and should be experienced if you're into cars, but there's too much bad attention and negativity around it now. IMO the better time is Sunday morning at DKF or Okutama; it's more chill and relaxed. I'm glad I was finally able to go, but not sure it's worth the drive from all the way from Nagoya immediately the day before, unless I was already staying in Tokyo for the days right before the meet, because you have to wake up quite early to make it in time. Funnily enough though I didn't drive the car all that much this trip because it was just too damn hot. While there were zero issues and running temps were nominal and the A/C was strong, RBs already run crazy hot as it is. Sure, it took it all like a champ but something about driving these cars in the ridiculous heat/humidity bothers me and makes me feel like I'm asking too much of it. I'm just me being weird and treating the car like a living thing with feelings; I'm mechanically sympathetic to a fault. Instead I was mainly driving something else around - a KX4(silver) 2001 X-Trail GT, that I acquired in May. There's a few different flavors to choose from with Xs, but visually it's the Nissan version of the Honda CR-V. Mechanically it's a whole different story as this, being the top-trim GT, has an SR20VET mated to a four-speed auto and full-time AWD! It was a very affordable buy in exceptional condition inside and out, with very low mileage...only 48k kms. Most likely it was owned by an older person who kept it garaged and well-maintained, so I'm really happy with how it all worked out. It literally needs zero attention at the moment, albeit except for some minor visual touch-ups. I wanted something quirky, interesting, and practical and for sure it handily delivers on all three of those aspects. I was immediately able to utilize the cargo and passenger capacity to its full extent. It's a lot of fun to drive and is quite punchy through 1st and 2nd. It's very unassuming -in the twisty bits it's a lot more composed than one would think at a glance- and it'll be even better once I get better tires on it(yes, it's an SUV but still a little boat-y for my liking). So...now I have two golden-era Nissans in silver. One sports car and one that does everything else; the perfect two-car solution I think👍 The rest of the trip...I was able to turn my stressed brain off and enjoy it, although I didn't quite get to do as much as I thought. I did some interesting things, met some interesting people, and happened into some interesting situations however, that's all for another post though only if people really want to know. Project-wise, I went back to Mine's again to discuss more plans and am hoping to wrap that up real soon; keep watching this space if that interests you. Additionally, while working in the tormenting sweatbox that is the warehouse, I was able to organize most of the myriad of parts that my friend is storing for me along with the cars, and the 34 has a nice little spot carved out for it: And since it can get so stupid hot in there, that made it all the more easy -after I was standing there looking at the car and said 'f**k it'- to finally remove all the damn gauges that have mostly been an eyesore all this time. Huzzah. The heat basically makes the adhesive backing on the gauge mounts more pliable to work with, so it was far less stressful getting this done. I didn't fully clean it up or chase the wiring though; that will happen once I have the car in closer possession. Another major reason to remove all that stuff is to give people less reasons to get in my car and steal s**t while it's being exported/imported when/if the time comes, which leads us to my next point... ...and that is even though it's time in Japan is technically almost up since it's a November car and the X would be coming in March, I'm still not entirely sure where my life and career is headed; I don't really know what the future looks like and where I'm going to end up. I feel there's a great deal of uncertainty with me and as a result of that, it feels like I'm at a crossroads moreso now than any point in my life thus far and there are some choices I need to make. Yes, I've had some years to consider things and prepare myself, however too much has happened in that time to maintain confidence and everything feels so up in the air; tenuous one might say. Simply put, there's just too much nonsense going on right now from multiple vectors. Admittedly, I'm struggling to stay in the game and keep my eyes on the prize. So much so in fact, that very recently I came the closest I ever have before to calling it quits outright; selling everything and moving on and not looking back. The astute among you will pick up on key subtext within this paragraph. In the meantime I've still managed to slowly acquire some final bits for the car, but it feels nice knowing there's not much left to get and I'm almost across that finish line; I have almost everything I'll ever want for my interpretation and expression on what it is I think an R34 should be. 'til later.
    • Thanks for that, hadn’t used my brain enough to think about that. 
    • Also playing with fire if they start to flow more air down low than what the stock twins can. It's not even up top you need to worry, it can be at 3000rpm and part throttle and it's getting way more flow than it should.
    • Any G40/1000 or G40/1250 results out there?  
    • You still want a proper tune on the stock ECU though. Stock tune + stock ECU with GT-SS/-9s is probably playing with fire if you're running more than stock airflow/power.
×
×
  • Create New...