Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, TurboTapin said:

Thanks for the info. I would buy it from you but I'm presuming you're not anywhere close to Canada and shipping would put your price into new turbo territory. 6466's are had here for 2650$CDN new to the door. Let me know, thanks. 

PM me and offer in CAD delivered to your door and I will say yes or no.

  • 3 weeks later...
3 hours ago, BK said:

7275 is a bit of a dramatic upsize over the 6466.

It has certainly softened the transition onto boost compared to the 6466 which was savage making 18lb at 3200 just rolling into it in 3rd.  Now its around 5000 to 22lb.   1st and 2nd get to about 15lb max not reaching minimum boost unless launch control is used, but the car also struggles for traction in the low gears anyway just rolling into it.  More boost isnt going to help that. I haven't maxed the turbo and don't really intend to.  28-30lb should see past 800kw, and it doesn't drop off in top end now like it was with the 6466.

  • Like 1

Precision just released a 6470 gen next R turbo

rated to almost 1000hp and comes with all the good size rear housings 

 

would be a killer street turbo if u want abit more then a 6466 and without it dropping off in top end 

  • Like 2
40 minutes ago, SiR_RB said:

Precision just released a 6470 gen next R turbo

rated to almost 1000hp and comes with all the good size rear housings 

 

would be a killer street turbo if u want abit more then a 6466 and without it dropping off in top end 

I did see that but thought it might be to much rear for the front 

  • Like 1
6 minutes ago, SiR_RB said:

It’s a good fit between 6466 and 6870

I think with the bigger front housing and rear on it the response will be closer to the 6870 and then you may as well grab the 6870 and take the extra power 

39 minutes ago, r32-25t said:

I think with the bigger front housing and rear on it the response will be closer to the 6870 and then you may as well grab the 6870 and take the extra power 

Yeah probably right there

16 minutes ago, jet_r31 said:

Is the 6470 a class turbo

I havnt looked yet.. Would have big exducer if it is.. 

yeh and a deeper wheel and larger exducer 

with massive rears available up to 1.7X ar in size 

On 21/10/2022 at 8:04 PM, r32-25t said:

I think all of precisions new turbos or “next gen r” are all aimed at being class legal turbos 

Yeah.  I wouldn't assume that the 6470 is kinda a smaller 6870, class legal turbos are designed with max flow for inducer size possible - which does not at all promise to maintain the response you'd expect from the size (not to say that it won't work out ok anyway, just can't promise).   Fwiw most 67mm class turbos are pretty laggy but make mental power for their size, and I fully expect the 6470 will be crazy power for a 64mm - it wouldn't shock me at all if they behave like a turbo at least as big as a 6870.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I'm looking for some real world experiences/feed back from anyone who has personally ran a EFR7670 with a 1.05 exhaust housing or a .83 I'm leaning towards the .83 because its a street car used mostly for spirited driving in the canyons roads. I"m not looking for big numbers on paper. I want a responsive powerband that will be very linear to 8000 rpm. I dont mind if power remains somewhat flat but dont want power to drop off on top. The turbo I've purchased is a 1.05, although the mounting flange T3 vs T4 and internal vs external waste gates are different on both housings, I not concern about swapping parts or making fabrication mods to get what I want. Based on some of the research I've done with chat gpt, the 1.05 housing seems to be the way to go with slightly more lag and future proofing for more mods but recommends .83 for best response/street car setup. AI doesn't have the same emotions as real people driving a GTR so I think you guys will be able to give me better feed back 😀   
    • Surely somebody has one in VIC. Have you asked at any shops?  Is this the yearly inspection or did you get a canary?
    • This is where I share pain with you, @Duncan. The move to change so many cooling system pieces to plastic is a killer! Plastic end tanks and a few plastic hose flanges on my car's fail after so little time.  Curious about the need for a bigger rad, is that just for long sessions in the summer or because the car generally needs more cooling?
    • So, that is it! It is a pretty expensive process with the ATF costing 50-100 per 5 litres, and a mechanic will probably charge plenty because they don't want to do it. Still, considering how dirty my fluid was at 120,000klm I think it would be worth doing more like every 80,000 to keep the trans happy, they are very expensive to replace. The job is not that hard if you have the specialist tools so you can save a bit of money and do it yourself!
    • OK, onto filling. So I don't really have any pics, but will describe the process as best I can. The USDM workshop manual also covers it from TM-285 onwards. First, make sure the drain plug (17mm) is snug. Not too tight yet because it is coming off again. Note it does have a copper washer that you could replace or anneal (heat up with a blow torch) to seal nicely. Remove the fill plug, which has an inhex (I think it was 6mm but didn't check). Then, screw in the fill fitting, making sure it has a suitable o-ring (mine came without but I think it is meant to be supplied). It is important that you only screw it in hand tight. I didn't get a good pic of it, but the fill plug leads to a tube about 70mm long inside the transmission. This sets the factory level for fluid in the trans (above the join line for the pan!) and will take about 3l to fill. You then need to connect your fluid pump to the fitting via a hose, and pump in whatever amount of fluid you removed (maybe 3 litres, in my case 7 litres). If you put in more than 3l, it will spill out when you remove the fitting, so do quickly and with a drain pan underneath. Once you have pumped in the required amount of clean ATF, you start the engine and run it for 3 minutes to let the fluid circulate. Don't run it longer and if possible check the fluid temp is under 40oC (Ecutek shows Auto Trans Fluid temp now, or you could use an infrared temp gun on the bottom of the pan). The manual stresses the bit about fluid temperature because it expands when hot an might result in an underfil. So from here, the factory manual says to do the "spill and fill" again, and I did. That is, put an oil pan under the drain plug and undo it with a 17mm spanner, then watch your expensive fluid fall back out again, you should get about 3 litres.  Then, put the drain plug back in, pump 3 litres back in through the fill plug with the fitting and pump, disconnect the fill fitting and replace the fill plug, start the car and run for another 3 minutes (making sure the temp is still under 40oC). The manual then asks for a 3rd "spill and fill" just like above. I also did that and so had put 13l in by now.  This time they want you to keep the engine running and run the transmission through R and D (I hope the wheels are still off the ground!) for a while, and allow the trans temp to get to 40oC, then engine off. Finally, back under the car and undo the fill plug to let the overfill drain out; it will stop running when fluid is at the top of the levelling tube. According to the factory, that is job done! Post that, I reconnected the fill fitting and pumped in an extra 0.5l. AMS says 1.5l overfill is safe, but I started with less to see how it goes, I will add another 1.0 litres later if I'm still not happy with the hot shifts.
×
×
  • Create New...