Jump to content
SAU Community

Josh Williams possibly goes by Josh Redman or Josh Wills


Recommended Posts

Anyone know this bloke? Sold him a turbo, received a screen shot of a legitimate looking bank transfer so I sent it out with a few other things leaving that day before it cleared.

Money never cleared, and I got the usual story he will resend it, then the usual sob story he just lost his job and his mrs and he needs that $275 to live, then vanished. Has answered his phone once by mistake.

Lives in the Hounville area.

PayPal id linked to his phone number is Joshua Redman, but went by the name Josh Wills.

Only asking SAU as is email address is [email protected]

It's not much, but he's lied to me three times and wont answer my phone calls which is the piss off. I'll happily sell the debt to a local debt collector, or report to VEDA through my work as a bad debt. 

Cheers,

Steve

 

hey mate, 

I've experienced the same issue before (im in perth WA). The guy sent me a bank money transfer screenshot (comm bank) and I called up the bank and they told me the sender can cancel the transaction within 2 hours. 

however, I've ended up randomly seeing his car driving past me not long after and I followed him to his house and next thing you know.. I got my part back (would not recommend).

just be careful next time and wait for the money to be cleared. 

  • 4 months later...

Ok, his real name is Joshua Redman, mobile number is 0412 997 269. 

He made one payment and then decided to block my number, I often catch up him slip up and answer private numbers to act like a stunned piece of shit and then hang up. 

He claimed to have Covid-19 and had to spent his tax return on medicine so couldn't pay. Being Tasmania hasn't had any active cases of public transmission in forever this is very unlikely.

 

 

  • Like 1
  • 3 months later...
On 13/10/2020 at 7:50 PM, masTers said:

Andergrove is in Queensland not Tassie and there is no Shane Court in or around the Huon & Channel area.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Have a look at that (shitty) pic I posted. You can see AN -4 braided line coming to a -4 to 1/8 BSPT adapter, into a 1/8 BSPT T piece. The Haltech pressure sender is screwed into the long arm of the sender and factory sender (pre your pic) into the T side. You can also see the cable tie holding the whole contraption in place. Is it better than mounting the sender direct to your engine fitting......yes because it removes that vibration as the engine revs out 50 times every lap and that factory sender is pretty big. Is it necessary for you......well I've got no idea, I just don't like something important failing twice so over-engineer it to the moon!
    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
×
×
  • Create New...