Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey guys new here but at my witts end with my car and really looking for some help.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Time for a long story. Owned my r34 NA Auto for about 9 years now. Car was running well until about 4 years ago when I started to get the A/T limp mode whenever the car went to shift into 3rd gear. Wasn't to fussed at the time as the car was about to go into the shop for a full motor and gearbox build.

Car ended up with a full forged motor with turbo and all the bells and whistles which I haven't had a problem with. Gearbox was also completely rebuilt from front to back and absolutely everything is brand new. Car is running a haltech 2500 elite if that helps. 

Now to the pain. After all the money and things replaced it still has the same AT problem when it tries to shift to 3rd and it just sticks on 3rd gear limp mode from there on out. 

Car has always been and is still auto. It has the original box and motor in the car and me and my mechanic can not figure out why the hell it keeps happening. 

My next move is replacing the TCU module as it's separate in the GT model but other than that I'm lost

Any ideas or help would be much appreciated 

Picture just coz I like to show it off.

Thank you guys

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

20230123_152025.jpg

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/484399-r34-det-gearbox-problems/
Share on other sites

This is a normal and expected outcome from doing what you have done.

I'm tired of going over what is going to be needed to fix it. The best solution is to not fix it, and to put a manual in.

Can't drive manual? Learn.

This is both the best solution and the simplest solution.

The more complicated solution is to reconnect the OEM ECU (yes, ecu) and reconnect its relevant parts to the TCU. Then you effectively splice the Haltech into the engine-parts of the OEM ECU, and run the haltech like an old school piggyback.

But it's a NA gearbox which will not last at all. It won't last if you put a shift kit in. It just won't last, period, so doing all of the above work will cost you thousands and leave you very sad.

Still don't want to go manual? You could go a Turbo gearbox and build that, but it's still a $10K adventure to get it close to being able to perform the way you want, including an aftermarket gearbox ECU, which gets wired in similar to the TCU's original setup. You will need aftermarket flex plates (they do not exist) and other bespoke things.

Your other option is to fully manualize the transmission.

The crux of the issue is that the R34 Turbo ECU has the gearbox/TCU pins on the engine ecu. The NA has them spaced out to a seperate TCU with the same inputs/outputs for Nissan reasons. It is plausible to rewirewire wires that lead to the NA TCM pins into their corresponding R34 GTT ENGINE ecu pins. This _will_ work, and then you could feasibly run a Nistune Engine ECU, which also only works for the Turbo/GTT ecu. The workshop manual pinouts are a treasure.

In theory you could look ingo the workshop manual and see what inputs the R34 TCM actually needs so it can operate the gearbox. It probably has wiring for power, tach, TPS and such from the engine ECU. Probably. I never looked into this.

Lots of ECU wiring and f**king about ahead for you. All of it more expensive than a manual swap. Much more complex than a manual swap. Much worse result than a manual swap. My car spent years at a workshop with them trying to figure this out until I did it with a mate in about 30 minutes by actually reading the manual.

Oh look I said manual again.
Go manual.

Any excuse you have about this is invalid. Refer to this post in the future, so you can re-read it and be like "lol shit yeah he was right I'm glad I went manual"

  • Like 2

I understand the whole going manual thing but I had a work accident a couple years back where I lost alot of feeling in my left leg so I am unable to feel things like clutch pressure so unfortunately manual is not an option for me.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  • Like 1
24 minutes ago, theonlypancakeofdoom said:

I understand the whole going manual thing but I had a work accident a couple years back where I lost alot of feeling in my left leg so I am unable to feel things like clutch pressure so unfortunately manual is not an option for me.

 

Then you're in for a rough spot.

I would legitimately consider the crazy path of a BMW DCT conversion. Anything else is going to be underwhelming. Sensible me says buy a car with a decent auto in it. A V8 10 speed mustang is going to be a lot more fun and a lot more fast, and a lot more everything than the anguish of going down this path.

It really depends on how irrationally compulsive you are with regards to keeping a R34, or whether you want what an R34 can do. If in your mind this is a 100K, once in a lifetime car, BMW DCT is your answer. If logic is being applied in any way, shape, or form... A10 Mustang or one of the many other automatic-optioned vehicles is going to be far faster, simpler, easier, more enjoyable, less regrets.

8 minutes ago, Kinkstaah said:

Then you're in for a rough spot.

I would legitimately consider the crazy path of a BMW DCT conversion. Anything else is going to be underwhelming. Sensible me says buy a car with a decent auto in it. A V8 10 speed mustang is going to be a lot more fun and a lot more fast, and a lot more everything than the anguish of going down this path.

It really depends on how irrationally compulsive you are with regards to keeping a R34, or whether you want what an R34 can do. If in your mind this is a 100K, once in a lifetime car, BMW DCT is your answer. If logic is being applied in any way, shape, or form... A10 Mustang or one of the many other automatic-optioned vehicles is going to be far faster, simpler, easier, more enjoyable, less regrets.

I would sell it tomorrow if I could get what I wanted for it lol. But I'm so far invested that 

Ahhh. Greg's rage is palpable from here.

A version of Greg's ragey recommendation would be to look at https://support.haltech.com/portal/en/kb/articles/transmission-control and see that it should be possible to get this transmission (or, more sensibly, a turbo transmission, for the longevity reasons raged about) working direct from a Haltech ECU.

Having said that, in light of

22 hours ago, theonlypancakeofdoom said:

@GTSBoy so are you saying that if I got rid of the tcu that the haltech could also control gearing? If so why in the world did my Tuner not do that in the first place?

I can't speak for your tuner's willingness to get involved in trying to program the transmission control. He might not know that it's possible. He might be scared, or too lazy, or any of a number of other reasons.

Regardless, as per Greg's rage out - there is wiring to be done. You have to obtain all the wiring that is currently present at the TCU, work out which wire is which input and which output (and which might be able to be ignored, if they were originally signals to/from the ECU) and then marshal them to the Haltech.

But.....this now I think leads us to the answer. The TCU is probably having a shit fit because you have removed the factory ECU. It will not be happy about that, because they like to talk to each other. The TCU relies on some info from the ECU to do its thing, and not having that would be enough to make it go to limp mode. So, some of Greg's rant regarding putting the factory ECU back in, in parallel with the Haltech would be a (shitty) path forward.

Just wire it to the Haltech and get someone competent to set it up.

  • Like 1

OK so update after today. Have plugged in a new tcu and actually have access to all gears and car shifts now. Still has AT light on but I assume that's now because this is a plain tcu and doesn't have any sort of tune on it

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1 hour ago, GTSBoy said:

Ahhh. Greg's rage is palpable from here.

Just wire it to the Haltech and get someone competent to set it up.

Not really rage, but "I turboed my NA auto and it doesnt work now" is a thing. Because people do this cheaply (not necessarily OP) it is generally "how much of my original NA car can I retain?"

Which is effectively nothing. It's _probably_ still cheaper to sell the NA and buy a turbo 😛

Still does not solve the issue of the cheese gearbox which won't survive 150kw, let alone whatever the forged motor is wanting to be. Haltech when I did it, did _not_ have an automatic gearbox controllable ECU for sale. Nobody did...

If the elite can do it, do it. The main issue will be finding an auto elec at $150/hr with the confidence to give this a try, but once you do it is fairly straightforward as long as the auto (any auto) has its inputs in the realm it likes. It just won't, and cannot, and never will be a straightforward plug and play solution.

Until someone makes an adapter I suppose, to go from the NA TCM to the GTT OEM ECU...

 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Look, realistically, those are some fairly chunky connectors and wires so it is a reasonably fair bet that that loom was involved in the redirection of the fuel pump and/or ECU/ignition power for the immobiliser. It's also fair to be that the new immobiliser is essentially the same thing as the old one, and so it probably needs the same stuff done to make it do what it has to do. Given that you are talking about a car that no-one else here is familiar with (I mean your exact car) and an alarm that I've never heard of before and so probably not many others are familiar with, and that some wire monkey has been messing with it out of our sight, it seems reasonable that the wire monkey should be fixing this.
    • Wheel alignment immediately. Not "when I get around to it". And further to what Duncan said - you cannot just put camber arms on and shorten them. You will introduce bump steer far in excess of what the car had with stock arms. You need adjustable tension arms and they need to be shortened also. The simplest approach is to shorten them the same % as the stock ones. This will not be correct or optimal, but it will be better than any other guess. The correct way to set the lengths of both arms is to use a properly built/set up bump steer gauge and trial and error the adjustments until you hit the camber you need and want and have minimum bump steer in the range of motion that the wheel is expected to travel. And what Duncan said about toe is also very true. And you cannot change the camber arm without also affecting toe. So when you have adjustable arms on the back of a Skyline, the car either needs to go to a talented wheel aligner (not your local tyre shop dropout), or you need to be able to do this stuff yourself at home. Guess which approach I have taken? I have built my own gear for camber, toe and bump steer measurement and I do all this on the flattest bit of concrete I have, with some shims under the tyres on one side to level the car.
    • Thought I would get some advice from others on this situation.    Relevant info: R33 GTS25t Link G4x ECU Walbro 255LPH w/ OEM FP Relay (No relay mod) Scenario: I accidentally messed up my old AVS S5 (rev.1) at the start of the year and the cars been immobilised. Also the siren BBU has completely failed; so I decided to upgrade it.  I got a newer AVS S5 (rev.2?) installed on Friday. The guy removed the old one and its immobilisers. Tried to start it; the car cranks but doesnt start.  The new one was installed and all the alarm functions seem to be working as they should; still wouldn't start Went to bed; got up on Friday morning and decided to have a look into the no start problem. Found the car completely dead.  Charged the battery; plugged it back in and found the brake lights were stuck on.  Unplugging the brake pedal switch the lights turn off. Plug it back in and theyre stuck on again. I tested the switch (continuity test and resistance); all looks good (0-1kohm).  On talking to AVS; found its because of the rubber stopper on the brake pedal; sure enough the middle of it is missing so have ordered a new one. One of those wear items; which was confusing what was going on However when I try unplugging the STOP Light fuses (under the dash and under the hood) the brake light still stays on. Should those fuses not cut the brake light circuit?  I then checked the ECU; FP Speed Error.  Testing the pump again; I can hear the relay clicking every time I switch it to ON. I unplugged the pump and put the multimeter across the plug. No continuity; im seeing 0.6V (ECU signal?) and when it switches the relay I think its like 20mA or 200mA). Not seeing 12.4V / 7-9A. As far as I know; the Fuel Pump was wired through one of the immobiliser relays on the old alarm.  He pulled some thick gauged harness out with the old alarm wiring; which looks to me like it was to bridge connections into the immobilisers? Before it got immobilised it was running just fine.  Im at a loss to why the FP is getting no voltage; I thought maybe the FP was faulty (even though I havent even done 50km on the new pump) but no voltage at the harness plug.  Questions: Could it be he didnt reconnect the fuel pump when testing it after the old alarm removal (before installing the new alarm)?  Is this a case of bridging to the brake lights instead of the fuel pump circuit? It's a bit beyond me as I dont do a lot with electrical; so have tried my best to diagnose what I think seems to make sense.  Seeking advice if theres for sure an issue with the alarm install to get him back here; or if I do infact, need an auto electrician to diagnose it. 
    • Then, shorten them by 1cm, drop the car back down and have a visual look (or even better, use a spirit level across the wheel to see if you have less camber than before. You still want something like 1.5 for road use. Alternatively, if you have adjustable rear ride height (I assume you do if you have extreme camber wear), raise the suspension back to standard height until you can get it all aligned properly. Finally, keep in mind that wear on the inside of the tyre can be for incorrect toe, not just camber
    • I know I have to get a wheel alignment but until then I just need to bring the rear tyres in a bit they're wearing to the belt on the inside and brand new on the outside edge. I did shorten the arms a bit but got it wrong now after a few klms the Slip and VDC lights come on. I'd just like to get it to a point where I can drive for another week or two before getting an alignment. I've had to pay a lot of other stuff recently so doing it myself is my only option 
×
×
  • Create New...