Jump to content
SAU Community

Shifter slips past Snap ring

couchboy
 Share

Recommended Posts

couchboy Enthusiast

couchboy

Posted
Posted (edited)

Hi Guys 

I've got a brand new 25det neo gearbox and just installed the brand new shifter, put the snap ring in and with how tight the shifter and snap ring are if you wriggle the shifter it will come out. My question is are all snap rings the same or does the 25 neo gearbox have a wider snap ring or is it possible for the bush on the bottom of the shifter to be the wrong one. Shifter was brought separately. Any advice would be greatly appreciated. 

Cheers

 

 

 

 

20240106_142906.jpg

20240106_142912.jpg

 

Edited by couchboy
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/485200-shifter-slips-past-snap-ring/
Share on other sites
Duncan Grand Master

Duncan

Posted
Posted

There definitely are 2 bush sizes, I've been caught out by that too....but that won't affect whether the shifter is retained, it would either not fit (large bush in small hole) or be super loose (opposite).

However, I've never understood why, but there are 2 snap rings on the shifter....

shifter-snap-rings.jpg

couchboy Enthusiast

couchboy

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Update: took the cup out to check for size and is correct size. I think it just needed more lube as it is seated correctly now and can put the second snap ring in under the one that goes in the groove 🥳. cheer guys 🤙

  • Like 1
couchboy Enthusiast

couchboy

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Me again 🤣, curclip, is there one size fits all or does the 25det neo box have a curtain curclip, bonus point for a part number. I do have one but it does shrink enough to be able to fit in the hole, think came out of a rb20.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Kinkstaah
      RB25DE NEO with Haltech ECU

      By Kinkstaah · Posted

      @Haggerty this is your red flag. In MAP based ECU's the Manifold pressure X RPM calculation is how the engine knows it is actually...running/going through ANY load. You are confusing the term 'base map' with your base VE/Fuel table. When most people say 'base map' they mean the stock entire tune shipped with the ECU, hopefully aimed at a specific car/setup to use as a base for beginning to tune your specific car. Haltech has a lot of documentation (or at least they used to, I expect it to be better now). Read it voraciously.
    • GTSBoy
      RB25DE NEO with Haltech ECU

      By GTSBoy · Posted

      I saw you mention this earlier and it raised a red flag, but I couldn't believe it was real. Yes, the vacuum signal should vary. It is the one and only load signal from the engine to the ECU, and it MUST vary. It is either not connected or is badly f**ked up in some way.
    • Murray_Calavera
      RB25DE NEO with Haltech ECU

      By Murray_Calavera · Posted

      @Haggerty you still haven't answered my question.  Many things you are saying do not make sense for someone who can tune, yet I would not expect someone who cannot tune to be playing with the things in the ECU that you are.  This process would be a lot quicker to figure out if we can remove user error from the equation. 
    • MBS206
      R32 GTS (RB20DE) Injectors Replacement

      By MBS206 · Posted

      If as it's stalling, the fuel pressure rises, it's saying there's less vacuum in the intake manifold. This is pretty typical of an engine that is slowing down.   While typically is agree it sounds fuel related, it really sounds fuel/air mixture related. Since the whole system has been refurbished, including injectors, pump, etc, it's likely we've altered how well the system is delivering fuel. If someone before you has messed with the IACV because it needed fiddling with as the fuel system was dieing out, we need to readjust it back. Getting things back to factory spec everywhere, is what's going to help the entire system. So if it idles at 400rpm with no IACV, that needs raising. Getting factory air flow back to normal will help us get everything back in spec, and likely help chase down any other issues. Back on IACV, if the base idle (no IACV plugged in) is too far out, it's a lot harder for the ECU to control idle. The IACV duty cycle causes non linear variations in reality. When I've tuned the idle valves in the past, you need to keep it in a relatively narrow window on aftermarket ecus to stop them doing wild dances. It also means if your base idle is too low, the valve needs to open too much, and then the smallest % change ends up being a huge variation.
    • Haggerty
      RB25DE NEO with Haltech ECU

      By Haggerty · Posted

      I guess one thing that might be wrong is the manifold pressure.  It is a constant -5.9 and never moves even under 100% throttle and load.  I would expect it to atleast go to 0 correct?  It's doing this with the OEM MAP as well as the ECU vacuum sensor. When trying to tune the base map under load the crosshairs only climb vertically with RPM, but always in the -5.9 column.
×
×
  • Create New...