Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi,

I'm looking into replacing my bnr34 seats (to save them), in my opinion I found the replacement ones: recaro cs sportset

Since I want to keep the same height vision as the original seats, I'm wondering what is the result if using the recaro rails for those seats (which doesn't required any modification to be fitted on the r32,33,34 platform)

any feedback is appreciated 

Best regards 

Hmm I don't think there is anything to be concerned about, but I doubt me saying that will convince you. 

I also doubt anyone with these seats will reply in this thread (at $6000ish for a pair I'd be surprised to find anyone running these seats in an R chassis). 

So my solution is, take measurements yourself and see what you think. Measure up your factory seats and compare with this - 

recarosportster-sizeguide_2048x.jpg

1 hour ago, Murray_Calavera said:

Hmm I don't think there is anything to be concerned about, but I doubt me saying that will convince you. 

I also doubt anyone with these seats will reply in this thread (at $6000ish for a pair I'd be surprised to find anyone running these seats in an R chassis). 

So my solution is, take measurements yourself and see what you think. Measure up your factory seats and compare with this - 

recarosportster-sizeguide_2048x.jpg

All this will tell him is how big his factory seats are compared to the new recaros.

its the seat rails that will determine how high or low the new seats will sit.

I guess position seat is the same between R and non R chassis ?

Yes rails needs to be taking into account too 

I suppose I will do my own research (not easy as the view seat is influenced by the angle of the bottom part of the seat )

Anyway if anyone come to this thread dont hesitated to post haha

thanks guys 

maybe useful or not useful but look into getting the Sportster GT not CS.

GT version has a sub belt hole so you can use a 6 point harness, where as the CS doesn't have that.

I've been looking into getting a pair for my shit box, however can't get over the total cost. Wanting to remove the fix bucket seat as I take my son around in the car at times and prefer easier access to the rear seat from the driver's side.

  • Like 1
3 hours ago, UWISSH! said:

All this will tell him is how big his factory seats are compared to the new recaros.

its the seat rails that will determine how high or low the new seats will sit.

Yep, the rails will have an impact on the overall seat height. In this instance though I bet there will be hardly anything in it, surely the Recaro rails will be well designed and I bet they will be near identical to the factory rail height. 

If he said, and I plan to use these cheap no-name $100 seat base/rails, then yeah I'd be concerned about the impact they will have on the seating height. 

So what I was suggesting is, using the assumption that the factory rails and Recaro rails will have a similar impact on the seating height, he can measure the thickness of the seat base as this will likely be the largest impact on the overall seat height. 

Just reading a bit more, it seems like these seats use a side mount, it keeps referring to them as an 'integrated sidemount' so I'm not sure how easy it would be to use an adjustable sidemount with them. 

Might be worth looking into if the Sportster CS can be used with an adjustable sidemount. Surely that would be problem solved if thats the case. 

  • Like 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • There's restrictor pills in the stock boost control hoses. That's how they set the amount that was bled off and hence the "high" boost setting. The usual mod in the day was to remove it and send the "high" boost setting up to about 14 psi.
    • Thanks Duncan, that's the best info I've read. Furthermore after learning about the PCM programming side controlling the factory boost solenoid, the purpose of the solenoid is to "bleed" boost when pin 25 is earthed, thus allowing spring pressure in the wastegate actuator to overcome diaphragm boost pressure, thus closing or reducing the position of the wastegate flap creating more boost as the turbo is able to spin faster. It's pretty cool to see a designated Pill to do exactly this, would have liked to have seen it with a tiny filter over the end for those moments in vacuum.  The constant bleed pill has now been removed completely from the system and solenoid boost control has been restored once again.   Case closed 😂
    • The wideband reading is meaningless if it's not running. Why are you using shitty old sidefeeds on any engine, let alone a Neo? What manifold and fuel rail are you using to achieve that? Beyond that, can't help you with AEM stuff as I've never been their ECU/CAS combo.
    • Manual boost controllers (where a little of the boost was bled off) were quite common back in the day, because they were cheap and easy. Generally they had a manual adjustment screw rather than being fixed like yours. Down side is they always bleed boost, not just when you want them to so an electronic boost controller that uses a solenoid will have less lag.
    • Hello , im new here and i have A31 home build  RB25det neo stock eng / turbo  aem ems 2 blue connector  aem 3.5 map aem cas disk aem wideband connected to ecu  355 lph pump 550 nismo yellow injectors side feed aftermarket regulator  and won’t start with base aem tuner basic tune eventually flipped cas 180 degree so it triggers on correct stroke not in exhaust cycle  Now it won’t start Wideband reads 10 and 11 at lowest fuel setting  and will share calibrations soon for aem tuner i think something is wrong in aem tuner    please if you have any information, am very grateful         
×
×
  • Create New...