Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hello, just just bought an 1999 enr34 with a stock rb25neo and I'm looking to upgrade the engine to 500whp I know some basic things but wondering if there are things I'll need to do to upgrade the stock block and all the bits and pieces to achieve this.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/486300-upgrade-an-rb25neo/
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, GTSBoy said:

Although the best way will be to put in an LS7. Why anyone would mess with an RB when they live in the country where the LS7 was built is a mystery that can never be solved.

I frequently tell people interested in buying a GTR to either pick a 996 Turbo or E92 335i 6MT. Either one is close enough to being what you wanted from a GTR while being much, much cheaper. I just have brain damage and had to have one anyways.

1 hour ago, joshuaho96 said:

I frequently tell people interested in buying a GTR to either pick a 996 Turbo or E92 335i 6MT. Either one is close enough to being what you wanted from a GTR while being much, much cheaper. I just have brain damage and had to have one anyways.

these are not the same

5 minutes ago, Kinkstaah said:

these are not the same

They aren't, but it depends on what interests you about an R32-R34. If it's the front engine I6 turbo that tunes well with a manual transmission an E92 335i 6MT is so incredibly cheap. You can get a super clean one for 20-25k USD tops. Put an LSD in it, tune it, have fun with it. If it's the general idea of AWD + turbo and a manual transmission the 996 Turbo is absolutely much more expensive, it's less practical but it's also basically a complete track-ready car from the factory. At least the Mezger doesn't have heaps of oil control issues. And in the US the 996 Turbo and R33 GTR are roughly the same price these days. 996 maybe a bit more now that the hype has abated for old Skylines here.

I would like to keep it around 15k but if I need more to make it reliable and not have to worry about the car breaking I can go more. It's my project car so I'm just trying g to figure out what needs to be in it i know basic things like turbo cams injectors I'm just unsure of the size and the specifics so I'm spending alot of time on Google and its mostly rb25 and rb26 not alot on neo

On 18/05/2025 at 4:19 PM, joshuaho96 said:

I frequently tell people interested in buying a GTR to either pick a 996 Turbo or E92 335i 6MT. Either one is close enough to being what you wanted from a GTR while being much, much cheaper. I just have brain damage and had to have one anyways.

M240i xDrive is the way.  3litre straight 6 coupe w/single turbo, ZF8, Rear biased 4WD.  It's more Skyline GT-R than the R35 by miles.

Posted (edited)
16 minutes ago, robbo_rb180 said:


BMW M240i 2022 review: xDrive Coupe - Dynamic alternative to Audi TT and  Toyota Supra | CarsGuide

Christian Bale Wow GIF by ProBit Global

 

Almost midnight purple, too :D

For ages I was like, dammit - GTRs are too out of my price range to start with before modding... then it turns out you can have a 3litre, a ZF8, a single turbo - all things I'd likely do (at least similar) to a GT-R, but there from factory as well as all the other nice modern car things you get.   Then you look at what you can do with B58s and ZF8s, people are in the 7s with this platform already with the cast alloy block and still 8 speed.

Edited by Lithium
  • Like 1
1 hour ago, Lithium said:

Mechanically that's essentially what the M240i is, it's just not pretending it's not a BMW :D

I mean, the 240i is not a Supra... make it drop a few hundred kg, have a sportscar chassis, clearance for wheels etc...

Maybe I want a hardtop Z40i XDrive or something :p

I do agree with you though and have long said the B58 Supra/240i/340i/440i is the new R Chassis/JDM90's turbo rocket for mod lovers to ... not always appreciative response lol.

Doesn't make it not true though.

  • Like 1
On 18/05/2025 at 3:48 AM, Tekitsune said:

Hello, just just bought an 1999 enr34 with a stock rb25neo and I'm looking to upgrade the engine to 500whp I know some basic things but wondering if there are things I'll need to do to upgrade the stock block and all the bits and pieces to achieve this.

Back on topic for you for a post

Will it be on pump or ethanol?

2025 Spec RB build:

G30 660 .83 would be good 
artec manifold
turbosmart 45mm external gate
1000cc Injectors
Kelford cams 264 and springs
Pistons and rods for insurance
Oil pump with billet gears
Headdrain and all good oil mods
Quality intercooler
3.5 inch dump pipe to decent exhaust
Link plugin Ecu or what ever your tuning is comforatble with
Bolt on Trigger Kit - Nzwiring kit is go to
ARP Headstuds
Quality headgasket
quality fuel pump- a TI/walbro 525lph PWM would be the go
Quality fuel reg

Will be over $15K AUD
Enjoy the noise of rb on gate at over 7400rpm.
Start looking for gearbox conversions if your hard on the gear.

Now I've been there and done that with rb powered street car (2007-2022) much prefer newer stuff. Anything 90's Japanese is not a great experience these days and highly over rated.
My 2015 Brz with a heap of suspension mods is such a better car even with out the power of my old s chassis' even on track.
If wanting to play light chassis and decent power for a  giggle a k swap 86/brz would be the go

Check my old build for engine stuff


I really need to pay attention to post 2016 BMW stuff but seem all very heavy 1600+kg
 

  • Like 4
3 hours ago, robbo_rb180 said:

Back on topic for you for a post

Will it be on pump or ethanol?

2025 Spec RB build:

G30 660 .83 would be good 
artec manifold
turbosmart 45mm external gate
1000cc Injectors
Kelford cams 264 and springs
Pistons and rods for insurance
Oil pump with billet gears
Headdrain and all good oil mods
Quality intercooler
3.5 inch dump pipe to decent exhaust
Link plugin Ecu or what ever your tuning is comforatble with
Bolt on Trigger Kit - Nzwiring kit is go to
ARP Headstuds
Quality headgasket
quality fuel pump- a TI/walbro 525lph PWM would be the go
Quality fuel reg

Will be over $15K AUD
Enjoy the noise of rb on gate at over 7400rpm.
Start looking for gearbox conversions if your hard on the gear.

Now I've been there and done that with rb powered street car (2007-2022) much prefer newer stuff. Anything 90's Japanese is not a great experience these days and highly over rated.
My 2015 Brz with a heap of suspension mods is such a better car even with out the power of my old s chassis' even on track.
If wanting to play light chassis and decent power for a  giggle a k swap 86/brz would be the go

Check my old build for engine stuff


I really need to pay attention to post 2016 BMW stuff but seem all very heavy 1600+kg
 

From watching the 6 hour, it seems they've really got the class A2 Ford Mustang sorted, as it was cutting it up in lap times with he X1 cars, which are all those late model turbo BMWs.

I have no real idea about either of them, but watching what was happening at the 6Hour, it made the Mustang which is meant to be in a slower class look very impressive.

16 hours ago, Lithium said:

M240i xDrive is the way.  3litre straight 6 coupe w/single turbo, ZF8, Rear biased 4WD.  It's more Skyline GT-R than the R35 by miles.

The trouble for me is the automatic takes away so much from it. And the E92 has hydraulic power steering. Even after putting in an LSD you're looking at re-mapping the xDrive to be more like a Skyline which is just a lot of effort for something that is supposed to be easier and cheaper. I consider the E92 335i 6MT to basically be the obviously superior car to something like an R34 GTT. Half the price out here, the N54 makes so much more power so easily, is a far more refined car, etc. You do have to deal with the nightmare of the N54's foibles vs the B58 which is comparatively miles better and if a turbo does fail it's only one of them vs two and a lot less pipe spaghetti. 

996 or 997 Turbo has the AWD system mapped like a Skyline. Basically always RWD unless engaging the front axle makes sense. A coworker let me drive his 997.2 Turbo 6MT and it's absolutely tremendous. I don't think I'd want more power in a street car.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I know why it happened and I’m embarrassed to say but I was testing the polarity of one of the led bulb to see which side was positive with a 12v battery and that’s when it decided to fry hoping I didn’t damage anything else
    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
×
×
  • Create New...