Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

i just thought i would start a thread for people to throw up their dyno sheet and a list of major mods so people can compare and enquire what make a good improvement and what doesnt and to see how laggy certain turbos actually do make the ol rb engines....

i have :

lt12 plug in microtech ecu

gt28440hp bb turbo (t25 flange)

600x300x76 modified hybrid cooler

malipassi reg

480cc injectors

bosch 909 pump

3 inch exhaust with custom dump pipe and no cat

adjustable cam gears

profec b spec 1 boost controller

im especially keen to see guys with rb20 engines and turbos like 2530,2540 etc

my graph can be seen here.... http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/at...achmentid=21307

low boost (8 psi) hi boost (18 psi) cheers Jon

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/49209-post-up-your-best-dyno-graph/
Share on other sites

  • Replies 223
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

My R33 is still pretty stock but i have dyno figures for it.

it has-

- a front mount intercooler kit by Hybrid.

- a custom made double dump pipe by Drift King.

- a turbosmart boost controller switchable hi/low boost.

- 3 inch exhaust.

it makes max power at 6400rpm at 9 p.s.i.

http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/photopost.../cat/500/page/1

http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/photopost.../cat/500/page/1

heavily modified (engine just been refresh when the turbo and cam shaft fitted)

Apexi RX6 high-mount turbo

Apexi exhaust manifold

Apexi external wasgate

Apexi cam shaft

Apexi valve spring

Apexi fuel pump

Apexi injector

metal head gaskit

ARC front mount intercooler

Full trust exhaust system

Blitz dual sbc boost control

z32 air flow meter

Just Dyno the car at Dyno source and it made 392hp at rear wheels in 1.3bar(pump fuel)

should make 430hp at rear wheel in 1.4bar with race fuel

on the dyno graph still show car run very rich at 392hp at rear wheel in 1.3bar.

This is my current set up, im pushing my injectors a little though, need bigger injectors

lt12 plug in microtech ecu

gt2535 turbo

600x300x76 hybrid cooler

bosch motorsports fuel pump

3 inch exhaust with custom dump pipe and no cat

Bleed valve boost controller

215rwkw on 18psi

Dyno paper i will post as soon as i can get it scanned

I saw merli's 600.1 rwkw graph...but he claims to have "lost" the pic now.

here is mine from the SAU Dyno Day today :(

datto_dyno.jpg

Apparently it was running too rich, so we should be able to get the extra .3 rwkw with some tuning :D

I'd love to know Paul's secret to 450HP. I'm nearly there - with similar turbo (larger rear housing). Dude did you have an exhaust on your car when you got the 450 ?

This is 23 PSI - ( get no difference in power from 21 PSI upwards - tried 25 PSI today and 2 rwkw less - same dyno)

skylyn_dyno_2.jpg

GT30 is pretty ambiguous as to the size of the turbo, the GT30 family is huge. Then again, it could have a '30 rear, and a larger family compressor. Such mystery!

ps. 450 hp is 335kw, different dyno could accomodate such variation.

Edit: You can't compare the A/R directly between Garrett vs HKS - different designs where the HKS units have a smaller radius ®, so the area (A) could be the same on a larger HKS vs smaller Garrett.

Edit2: You would probably find that you can drop the size of your turbine housing B-Man and not lose horsepower.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
    • You don't have an R34 service manual for the body do you? Have found plenty for the engine and drivetrain but nothing else
×
×
  • Create New...