Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Interloper - yeah it was due to the fact that both of those guys have aftermarket turbo's plus other things where as my and the other guys cars are reasonably stock other than say suspension, ecu and exhaust.

So if an RB20 had a lowmount HKS 2540 or whatever it would be allowed into class C? provided they couldn't tell it was an aftermarket turbo :)

  • Replies 218
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

well lets just say there was a certain turk with aftermarket low mounts on his GTR that was in class D.

But the RB20 would still be in Class D - not Class C. When determining Classes via engine capacity - turbo cars have to multiply there capacity by a factor of 1.7 - so a 2L turbo engine = 3.4L after turbo factor is considered.

well lets just say there was a certain turk with aftermarket low mounts on his GTR that was in class D.

But the RB20 would still be in Class D - not Class C. When determining Classes via engine capacity - turbo cars have to multiply there capacity by a factor of 1.7 - so a 2L turbo engine = 3.4L after turbo factor is considered.

Ok, thanks for that. I didn't think they would put such a high multiplying factor like 1.7. I suppose thats good for you then - being in the same class as much smaller skylines and you having Rb26 goodness :D

:)

Incase you guys didn't know yet the results from the PIARC weekend are finally up on their website.

Some interesting points:

1. They took Adz's last session off him. No 1.58 for you boy. That'll teach ya to use cheater tyres. haha.

2. BRI 58Y could only manage a best time of 2.24.52 - and he reckon's 1.25's at Sandown?

3. I do get a trophey :D But they expect me to get it on Grand Final weekend :D

LOL...2.24s is quick considering its only an RB20 with TD06, susp work, semi clicks etc on it :D

Roll on the 1.25s at Sandown. :)

Yeah put it this way - I dont agree with it. You can go to a MSCA sprint and a guy with a stock Pulsar or an Astra Turbo is against me.

So next year we will hold a SAU VIC "Club Championship" And there will be classes to better represent our club. We won't be holding our own track days but will be doing things like going to a number of track days with invitations and we'll set up our own results.

Like the up-coming HSV day - if you dont own a Holden or Ford you are just lumped into the "accociated" class.

Cool with that. They'll see we're amongst them.

And my turbo is stock......on the outside. If I knew what was inside I'd run more boost. In fact I could have run stock and still made the same placing. Now for a personal set of sticky tyres. Shouldn't have blown 5K on a holiday to Koh Samui.

So next year we will hold a SAU VIC "Club Championship" And there will be classes to better represent our club. We won't be holding our own track days but will be doing things like going to a number of track days with invitations and we'll set up our own results.  

Sounds good - i'm looking forward to it. :headspin:

:D

I can't heel/toe, how am i gonna go on track??? Also is it safe to do 240k/h with spacers? Do i need to practice heel/toe before going on track or will i adapt during the way.

you'll be fine without heal/toeing, although you should start practising.

to get around any problems, just change down gear late during braking, not as soon as you hit the brakes, as long as you get the right gear you won't lock the wheels.

dunno about the spacers, I value my life too much to try them :D Is there plenty of thread left for the wheel nuts?

I can't heel/toe, how am i gonna go on track??? Also is it safe to do 240k/h with spacers? Do i need to practice heel/toe before going on track or will i adapt during the way.

Jesus...240km/h. You must have some decent mods to be hitting those sorts of speeds :D

Heel and toe is so easy. Its not hard to pick up, start doing it when you are slowing and there is no traffic around...you will pick it up pretty quick and soon you will never ever downchange again without a little blip to match the revs. :) BUT whilst its easy, get confident on the street first, nothing could be worse then getting tied up when you are trying to stop in a hurry at the track :Oops:

the pissy small accelerator pedal in the skylines make it harder to heal/toe also coz you gotta rotate ur heal alot to bleep the throttle. I have locked up the rear on the road practising alot of times and i still suck at it

:confused: In the R32s and R33s ive driven the pedals are positioned perfectly fo heel and toe.

When you start to brake apply your foot to the brake at an angle of approx30-45 degrees...whatevers comfortable. As the name suggests you only have the ball of your foot on the brake. So when you are about to release the clutch all you have to do is stab the throttle with your heel.

Dont try and rotate your foor if you are already on the brakes. After a while it becomes so second nature that you arent even really heel and toein, you somply roll your foot at the ankle and that bleeps the throttle enough for a downchange. But i would not start of trying that as you typically have to place your foor offset of centre on the brake pedal, and first things first...you are trying to stop the car so keep your foot inthe middle of the pedal so as not to skip off the pedal.

But typing the dribble probably makes it sound hard, its not its piss easy, you just perhaps need to see someone do it first .:D

Piss off Shan....is this thing ever going to see the track...or my garage mate:D?

I don't have enough flexibility to turn my foot in that far so have never bothered in the Skyline and have always used a custom pedal in other race cars. The current momo CF set are well placed but I have to raise the brake pedal or remove some play in the braking system as there is too much pedal drop and I contact the accelerator too early. It only needs to come up a little. This way feels more natural for me as my foot is vertical in braking and I just tap with the heel onto the accel pedal.

Piss off Shan....is this thing ever going to see the track...or my garage mate:D?

 

I don't have enough flexibility to turn my foot in that far so have never bothered in the Skyline and have always used a custom pedal in other race cars. The current momo CF set are well placed but I have to raise the brake pedal or remove some play in the braking system as there is too much pedal drop and I contact the accelerator too early. It only needs to come up a little. This way feels more natural for me as my foot is vertical in braking and I just tap with the heel onto the accel pedal.

Hey Skylinegeoff, since you've got things that i've pm you earlier, are they alright to do 200km/h safe and sound?

Hey Skylinegeoff, since you've got things that i've pm you earlier, are they alright to do 200km/h safe and sound?

LOL...Geoffs car is ready to be shot into outer space, so thats got to be 8 or 9 times the speed of sound, :D So 220km/hr is fine with spacers, provided:

- the nut stll has plenty of turns on the threads

- they are nipped up nice and tight (cant hurt to check after each session)

- ewen better if they are like Geoffs and they are captive :)

Yes mine bolt onto the hub and have a further set of studs in them for the wheels. They are more than safe in this configuration for pretty much any car and they have an alignment shoulder for locating the rim.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • For once a good news  It needed to be adjusted by that one nut and it is ok  At least something was easy But thank you very much for help. But a small issue is now(gearbox) that when the car is stationary you can hear "clinking" from gearbox so some of the bearing is 100% not that happy... It goes away once you push clutch so it is 100% gearbox. Just if you know...what that bearing could be? It sounding like "spun bearing" but it is louder.
    • Yeah, that's fine**. But the numbers you came up with are just wrong. Try it for yourself. Put in any voltage from the possible range and see what result you get. You get nonsense. ** When I say "fine", I mean, it's still shit. The very simple linear formula (slope & intercept) is shit for a sensor with a non-linear response. This is the curve, from your data above. Look at the CURVE! It's only really linear between about 30 and 90 °C. And if you used only that range to define a curve, it would be great. But you would go more and more wrong as you went to higher temps. And that is why the slope & intercept found when you use 50 and 150 as the end points is so bad halfway between those points. The real curve is a long way below the linear curve which just zips straight between the end points, like this one. You could probably use the same slope and a lower intercept, to move that straight line down, and spread the error out. But you would 5-10°C off in a lot of places. You'd need to say what temperature range you really wanted to be most right - say, 100 to 130, and plop the line closest to teh real curve in that region, which would make it quite wrong down at the lower temperatures. Let me just say that HPTuners are not being realistic in only allowing for a simple linear curve. 
    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
×
×
  • Create New...