Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Yep....it's disgusting. I can't wait until they (those in power making decisions based on their own interests) are old and decrepit, expecting the current younger generations to look after their incapable vegetative selves.

Well, I'd offer you my spare room old mate, but it just so happens I STILL DON'T OWN A HOUSE thanks to your short-sighted greed. Unrucky.

Says the dude with a 50K+ car.

Stop complaining.

I was waiting for you to say something lol

It's not that I can't afford a house. I definitely can. I'll be the first to admit I'm paid exorbitantly for my position. But we all know that's not my point at all.

But when you have one person with multiple houses to themselves only available as rental properties, along with Chinese (and many other foreign nationals; I understand the "Chinese" problem is blown up a bit), it's hardly fair.

I won't argue with supply vs demand; I will argue why the 'supply' side of the fence is a complete crock of bullshit though.

And it's funny how the media were originally spinning as many stories as they could regarding why 'now is the time to buy', but have recently started running stories the complete opposite (for most of the country at least).

Perth property listings highest in history. Sydney auction clearances down from 90% to 50%. Sale AND rental prices (bar the 'f**ked' places like Syd and Melb) are actually dropping, no matter how you play the stats (this was a previous 'prop it up' story - "prices rose X% in the last quarter" while neglecting to mention that's below the rate of inflation.

Edited by Trozzle

In that vain they should build shite loads of houses so Supply greatly over powers the demand.

They are lol. They really really are. Too many cashed up investors and not enough people simply wanting to be an owner-occupier. More incentives needed for first time buyers and owner-occupiers, less incentives for the greedy pricks with multiple properties...I suppose living in one and renting out the other is ok, but more than 2 and you're just a greedy flamin mongrel lol....well, if you're negatively gearing the second at least

Edited by Trozzle

In that vain they should build shite loads of houses so Supply greatly over powers the demand.

That's exactly what they are currently doing. Though the issue is no one wants to live where the land is. Everyone wants to live near the city.

They are lol. They really really are. Too many cashed up investors and not enough people simply wanting to be an owner-occupier. More incentives needed for first time buyers and owner-occupiers, less incentives for the greedy pricks with multiple properties...I suppose living in one and renting out the other is ok, but more than 2 and you're just a greedy flamin mongrel lol....well, if you're negatively gearing the second at least

Hardly need more incentives for first home buyers

$12000 and no stamp duty is good enough.

They are lol. They really really are. Too many cashed up investors and not enough people simply wanting to be an owner-occupier. More incentives needed for first time buyers and owner-occupiers, less incentives for the greedy pricks with multiple properties...I suppose living in one and renting out the other is ok, but more than 2 and you're just a greedy flamin mongrel lol....well, if you're negatively gearing the second at least

So what are people supposed to do if they have spare cash?

Be realistic.

I won't have this discussion here and now. Don't have time, and it's going to be an 'agree to disagree' thing, particularly given you've got your own place and have a very different perspective on the matter as a result.

Well if you'd picked up a property or two in western Sydney a year or so ago under $400k you could have made a packet then sold it by now to buy another property in say Canberra or elsewhere more affordable. Not all bad news unless you want to live in Sydney.

I think it's f**king greedy expecting hand outs and incentives to buy a house. I love your generation Troy!

Work hard, save up and use what you have.

Life is all about the choices YOU make.

I'm getting mixed vibes from this.

It's not intended to be mixed.

Just the sense of entitlement blows me away. Why should someone give you an incentive to buy a house.

Then you call people with multiple properties greedy. You have no idea how hard they may have worked to get in that position.

  • Like 2

We played against one of them at a LAN event down there in ACT and he carried the team really f**king hard haha. We would have won the whole event if he wasn't there. He dropped like 45 frags or something stupid like that.

Yeah man, I use to run the Canberra LANs - really fun place and the iM fellow is pretty sharrrrrrrp. I always outperform at LANs though and competitive matches (Not TMM)....I missed the last comp - my m8 who was going to enter our team didn't haha.. oh well Sounds like you had fun though.

That's what I thought you were getting at.

I don't expect any incentives - they just go to the seller anyway, and in no way make up for the inflation on the price.

We wouldn't be "entitled" if we didn't have reason to feel hard done by when it comes to our generation and home ownership.

Expecting the taxpayer to foot the bill on a business you knew was going to lose money somehow isn't also considered entitled? More so even? Coz that's what negatively gearing an investment property is, and that's where the problem lies. Piss off first home buyer incentives and get rid of any and all tax breaks and loopholes that are responsible for negative gearing, and I'll be happy. I don't need a hand out when things are a little fairer regarding income to house price ratio.

Edited by Trozzle

Well that contradicts what you said earlier.

The consequences of doing away with negative gearing will be quite high. It can't and won't be simply a step of just taking it away. I'd presume your rent would go up for one thing.

As was pointed out, things are fair it's just that everyone expects a palace near the city for their first home. They also expect expensive cars and holidays. People now want everything.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • 98 r34 gtt Been rocking my latest setup and car running like never before. Have put a good 200 miles on it since all the latest changes and additions. everything is dialed in and have been driving it a bunch.   However, all a sudden last weekend as soon as I pushed throttle passed 4k and the engine stumbles, (slow or fast acceleration) hesitates and doesn’t go above 4100 or so, like a misfire. Everything else seems fine. I had a “good” set of coil packs that I removed from car when I first got it when I changed them over to new coils. I swapped out current ones for those, but no change. I also changed the plugs, no change. Seems to rev over 4 when out of gear with no load just fine no “misfire”, but as soon as its in gear with a load of any kind, it “misfires” as soon as rpm drop back below 4 k it runs perfectly, smooth, starts, restarts and drives fine as long as I keep it below 4 k while in gear. All readings look fine, no CEL   Any idea as to what could all a sudden cause an issue when pushing rpms passed 4 k?
    • When you say your cams are 272/262 is that 272in and 262ex?
    • We're arguing semantics. I am saying 45 accel and a 55 deccel ramp are "2 ways". Even a 45 degree ramp and an 89 degree ramp is "2 ways", because it is literally... two ways. The cusco 55/30 ramp is a 2 way. It's two ways. I get it though - in normal nomenclature a "2 way" would be 45/45 or 55/55 or 60/60 i.e the same locking in both directions. And something like 45/65 would be considered "1.5 way". I would then say if we're getting into the nitty gritty then every locking diff is a "2 way" diff and we should not speak in 1.5, or 2 ways but ramp angles instead. Which ofc if one of those ramp angles is 90deg, that side is not doing any locking. :p So Nismo don't obviously sell 3 things. The fact of the matter that they only sell two items really goes to show that there's a 2 way and a "1,5 way" which is really a 1 way. I believe the actual lockup for the 'adjustability' of the GT pro is really just setting preload for when the ramps actually start locking up. It's not changing how much 'wayness' there is. It is (somehow) horribly explained. People just buy whatever diff and go "locks up good bruh" and that's what ends up on socials forever.  
    • No, you're wrong, and you've always been wrong about this. The Nismo has 2 sets of openings. One is a real 2-way, and the other is a 1-way. There is no 1.5-way possible with the ramps that they offer. A real 1.5-way does exist. That Cusco stuff I posted is a prime example. If the forward drive ramps are, say 55°, and the overrun ramps are, say, 30°, then you will get about half as much LSD effect on overrun than you do on drive. It is real, it realy works. OK, you're slightly right. The Nismo has 55° and 45° ramps on the 2-way, so it does offer less LSD effect on overrun. But, I think that just means that they've (probably) sensibly established that you do not want actually equal LSD effect on overrun. You just want "quite a lot, but not quite as much as the drive LSD effect".
×
×
  • Create New...