Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

updated again:

fixed missing image

fixed spelling mistakes

fixed grammar mistakes

added hyperlinks for each section

added section split based on content

added self tuning - fuel economy

added info on changing airflow meter

added info on powerfc tune protect

expanded info on tuning options and expected results

  • 2 weeks later...

do they release slightly differant maps in the diff versions of the pfc/hand controller maybe ?

I was comparing my ign map to the one in the faq, and in some points (outside of the first 10x10 range) they were off by like 10 degrees. I also compared them to the ign map in the FC PRO software, they was differant as well.. ??

Mine is pfc v 5.11, and hand controller v5.01A (might be the other way around)

Wered you grab the stock map on the faq from ?

as far as i know the stock maps don't change very often

i havent at least heard they do. they were taken from my tune

but i may have done it before i did factory reset so they could be a "tuned" ign map. when i get datalogit, ill copy mt tune. reset to factory defaults then upload the defualt maps to my site and then restore my tune and upload that as well. ill expand the powerfc faq a lot when i have a working datalogit

added boost control pics, info and wiring

added djetro harness and wiring and manal

added datalogit specific extra features

added datalogit logging options

added datalogit additional functions

corrected spelling mistake of my name

corrected double up paragraph

updated again:

added airtemp sensor on unsupported car info

added powerfc inside cover photos

added reflashable powerfc info

added custom hack / diy / hand controller holder pics

added basic hand controller use

added checking sensors

added checking functions

updated install info

those 2 manuals are old as the hills and are for rx7. They are also the older powerfc so its not upto as the japanese SR20/RB25/RB26 manual.

it comes off the main wiring haress which i think is a digital output from the gearbox somehow, ill find out

It most certainlly a gearbox feed... The only other alternative is the ABS sensors but it still works on non-ABS skylines so it must be a gear box feed....

Plus the skyline has a digital sendor to the dash display....

hey guys i have a question for those in the know

because the nvct cam timing is constantly variable on the NEO rb25, can the PowerFC be mapped for this function, or how does that work?

with the r33 rb25 its either full advance or full retard no inbetween. and is activated by a simple on/off switch in the ecu at the desired rpm.

anyone know how the powerfc and rb25neo nvct perform?

is it completley mapable throughout the entire rpm band or whats the go?

no idea but if you find out let us know, will add to powerfc-faq

the vvt on the rb25 (33) isnt controlable and its automatically controller by the powerfc emulating stock ecu functionality. you can see it turn on and off under check sensor / sw but its not controllable or editable in map form

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
    • You are all good then, I didn't realise the port was in a part you can (have!) remove. Just pull the broken part out, clean it and the threads should be fine. Yes, the whole point about remote mounting is it takes almost all of the vibration out via the flexible hose. You just need a convenient chassis point and a cable tie or 3.
×
×
  • Create New...