Jump to content
SAU Community

ATT: Mods WHERE did mikey's thread go?

ix9

By ix9,
in WA Wasteland

 Share

Recommended Posts

uneekwahn Grand Master

uneekwahn

Posted
Posted

I didn't intend for that to happen. I just wanted to open his eyes so he would realise that people like him is part of the problem!

Oh well. Next time I'll just keep my trap shut. Don't want to cause people to leave this wonderful organisation!

JH32 Grand Master

JH32

Posted
Posted
']Jason, you put forward a good point and i accept that i am part of the problem, that is why i have made the choice to leave and come back when i have became more mature. My account will be delete 2morrow by request of me

Don't be silly .... we don't want to see anybody leave.

I didn't see the previous thread but its just a case of not acting immaturely ie. the other young fellas in the "take me for a ride" thread. If everyone acts maturely then it'll return to being a fun and informative forum :cheers:

uneekwahn Grand Master

uneekwahn

Posted
Posted
Don't be silly .... we don't want to see anybody leave.

I didn't see the previous thread but its just a case of not acting immaturely ie. the other young fellas in the "take me for a ride" thread. If everyone acts maturely then it'll return to being a fun and informative forum  :cheers:

My point and sentiment exactly Jimih. Unfortunately I threw in a few too many "you're a tool mikey"'s for his liking I think.

My intention was to just open his eyes to see that he is part of the problem, but also that he can be part of the solution.

Treatem mean to keepem keen is my motto :rofl:

taynewguy Community Regular

taynewguy

Posted
Posted

ppl like me never know what's going on coz the threads get deleted before we even get a chance to read what's going on.

happens too often, but that's the point i guess....oh well i will shut up now.

G0DF4Th3R Grand Master

G0DF4Th3R

Posted
Posted

I disagree with you Mikey.. i think the thread was a good idea provided it brought forward input and foresight from all members, esp the ones that have been here awhile.. Even though Mikey says he is part of the problem, he did the right thing by addressing the issue rather than just saying "Oh SAU is shit coz of the n00bs, coz of this, coz of that, blah blah"..

i thin everyone is very interested in this topic and it can be very beneficial for all of us to discuss this openly.. Mikey - make a new topic and we all contribute as positively as possible.. no pisstaking, no sarcasm..

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share
Go to topic listing


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • The Bogan
      NC MX5

      By The Bogan · Posted

      Version 1 aluminium airbox is.......not acceptable No pics as I "didn't like the look.....alot" Even after all my "CAD", and measurements, the leg near the fusebox just didn't sit right as it ended up about 10mm long and made the angle of the dangle look wrong, the height was a little short as well, meh, I wasn't that confident that Version 1 was going to be an instant winner I might give Version 2 another go, there's plenty of aluminium at work, but, after having in on and off a few times, and laying in the old OEM airbox without the new pod filter and MAF, there may be an option to modify the OEM air box and still use the Autoexe front cover and filter.... maybe This >  Needs to fit in here, but using the panel, and not the pod, the MAF will need to fit in the airbox though> I'm thinking as the old OEM box and Autoexe cover that is sitting in the shed is just sitting around doing nothing, and they are relatively abundant and cheap to replace if I mess it up and need another, it may well fit with some modifications to how the Autoexe brackets mounts to the rad support, and some dremiling to move it get in there, should give me some more room for activities, as I don't want to move the MAF and affect the tune Sealing the hole it requires to stick it in the air box is simple, a tight fit and some pinch weld will seal it up tight  I am calling this a later problem though
    • Dose Pipe Sutututu
      Ethanol Content Sensor - Always at 11%?

      By Dose Pipe Sutututu · Posted

      and it ends up being already priced in as though you're just on 91RON without any ethanol. Car will lose a bit of economy as the short and long term fuel trims bring down the AFR back to stoich or whatever it is for cruise/idle for the engine.  
    • soviet_merlin
      Ethanol Content Sensor - Always at 11%?

      By soviet_merlin · Posted

      Oh, you are right. But, in Australia E10 is based on 91RON fuel and ends up being 94RON. Hence it being the cheaper option for economy cars. The more performance oriented cars go for the 98RON fuel that has no ethanol mixed in. The only step up we have left then at some petrol stations is E85.
    • niZmO_Man
      Lock up the old for sale / wtb threads.

      By niZmO_Man · Posted

      There is a warning that "this thread is super old" but they ignore that anyway...
    • TurboTapin
      Ethanol Content Sensor - Always at 11%?

      By TurboTapin · Posted

      With 10% Ethanol, we're talking 2-3% fuel consumption difference. The emissions reductions and octane boost in my opinion far outweigh this almost non existent loss.    My tanks sitting at 80%. Luckily that should go down fast as I'm on vacation again for the next two weeks. 
×
×
  • Create New...