Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Still unclear about the AFM correction. Won't this simultaneously affect the tables for fuel as well?

BTW there is possibly a slight driveability improvement with my adjustments listed from yesterday.

You idiots!

Its called an airflow correction table because you are altering airflow values!

You are getting more knock by doing this because your car is running leaner and more prone to pinging.

If you wanna alter ignition, you have to alter the ignition table lol.

Edited by bmxwrx

ok so the airflow correction table is airflow voltage vs inj amount then?

well im not seeing much more knock than i was last time, but what i am seeing is more timing thrown in, so how does that work?

yeah he is right ive just realised its fuel correction table

oh well ill change mine back to what it was

so moving them up higher would have made it rich as all hell yeah ?

in the hacking a datalogit website though it talks about ign vs airflow,

ign vs battery power etc etc etc... ?

I dont think it talks anywhere about inj vs airflow..

also.. it would explain how sam "added some timing" to my pfc without having to change the ign maps.......

yeah he is right ive just realised its fuel correction table

oh well ill change mine back to what it was

so moving them up higher would have made it rich as all hell yeah ?

well looking at dataglogit (the app) it has a table for INJ airflow correction

but can't see any IGN airflow correction, so im not sure. The car felt better when i increased those values, and i saw more timiing on timing monitor so im kinda confused? but i guess it makes sense to be INJ correction instead.

can a powerfc guru confirm/deny ?

airflow correction just bends the signal coming from the airflow meter to the ecu. so it affects both injectors and ign timing.

i don't want to be rude, but with the very thin grasp of tuning you have i wouldn't be touching your handcontroller.

i need a retune, and lately i have been driving around with ignition correction of 4-5degrees advance with next to nothing knock, including heavy load upto the redline. it seems like a lot and im not that game to keep advancing until i get it tuned.

Is there any risks other than knocking if i keep advancing it? And how much have you guys advanced the timing from a base map without knocking?

nah thats fair enough ill just store my airflow correction values back to how they were and keep moving my ign tables up slowly. ive moved mine up a total of 10 deg with great results as far as driveability and response goes and also fuel economy has shifted to much more reasonable values, 400ks.

once i have datalogit (group buy) ill build a knock map and then tune the points that dont knock up

by the way thats the point of this hole thread, to learn some self tuning that doesnt effect the cars reliability, sure if its dangerous / not safe then don't do it, im not say to do stuff thats not safe. to me it seems pointless to have complete engine management only to never manage it, to merely watch and assume its doing its best, soemtime the best tuning is done on the road in real time, you can't simulate everything, well at least in a practical environment anyway?

this thread is merely about learning and trying stuff, hence the DIY title

The tuner where I'm getting my car done at on Saturday apparently mainly uses the airflow table to tune the car - he uses the FC datalogit. Apparently there are usually only a few ignition points he has to fix up but generally pretty good. He is the tuner that Sydney kid uses so I assume he is good

ill ask him if it would be ok to tune the light load areas (igntion) when driving and monitoring the knock

Edited by benl1981

I think the only thing we cant tune is A/F ratios, it would be a nice to be able to rig up a system inside the cabin to have one eye on the A/F ratios and tune it on light , medium and full loads. As long as we have one eye on the "knock" and all ears on ping, a careful backyard tuner should be ok.

Paul , interesting thread and a good read but i have one question . I use a knock link on my track car and notice depending on what fuel i fill up with ( same brand BP ultimate) the knock link sometimes picks up a few knocks on different tanks . You might get "good" batches of fuel and "bad" batches and while adjusting your mixtures to suit every tank is fantastic you might be chasing your tail for most of the time.

adam

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • The answer to this would be I followed the documentation from Turbosmart which said each spring pressure could achieve a maximum of 5x it's rated pressure so the included smallest spring being the 6psi had a range up to 30psi. I went with the 12 because I figured it'd likely hover around 15psi as a base pressure however I was obviously wrong.    I have a log here that I'll dig out that is purely wastegate and no Mac valve controlling anything.   If it can't hold anywhere near 12psi, does that mean the straight gate is virtually wide open during a run? Or am I thinking about this all wrong.   I could Tee Piece into the cooler pipe pre intercooler where the wastegate gets its feed, and send that to the ecu and see how that reads, I just don't have a spare pressure sensor currently that's all.
    • lol nice, I wouldn't worry about sanding back the filler to check for rust then. Yep very much a thing. Personally I don't do the panel beating, its very easy to have a panel beater sort that out for you. If they aren't doing any prep work the actual panel beating generally doesn't take long at all.  Have you taken before pictures before you started this project? I'd be keen to see the before and afters when you're done.
    • Some good discussion in here, for the most part I can't really add too much to it - thought I'd add some notes to the datalog screen shot that probably aren't news to anyone but a good prop... this is assuming 25psi-ish should be the boost ceiling given the first post refers to 23psi.   To state the obvious, this issue seems super weird.  Turbo speed seems pretty lethagic to build, like the turbo isn't getting as much drive as it needs - and it doesn't help that wgdc keeps rising AFTER boost target then completely shuts duty at a point, which in theory should have the straight gate dump heaps past the turbo and funnily enough causes the huge drop off.  It seems like pretty blunt boost control tuning but I'd not call that the primary issue, so much as possibly not helping the situation. I'm curious, what does a pull look like with purely mechanical boost control?  Like purely wastegate?   There are things in this log and story that make it sound like there could be a significant restriction in the intercooler piping or something - but then it's also overshooting boost target which is NOT what you'd expect with a restriction.   I can see where people are coming from with the non-linear wastegate bypass (not that any valves are linear for this kind of thing), but it still doesn't make sense that it can't hold <20psi on a 12psi spring.    Have you, or can you try measuring pressure pre-intercooler?  Be pretty interesting to see what's happening there vs in the intake manifold - sorry if I've repeated old ground, I've kinda skimmed over but I could have missed something.  In terms of comments regarding the wg spring being closer to boost target, I haven't used a straight gate but part of the reason for having close to wg target is about fighting backpressure as well - I might be wrong, but I'd have thought that part of the point of using a butterfly valve like the straight gate does you actually don't have to resist pressure at all, on EITHER side of the gate.   It shouldn't need too much leverage to start opening, the spring being more to do with where it triggers opening as opposed to resisting boost & EMAP, though smarter people can correct me if I'm wrong there.  
    • Ah the car is a complete shitbox and not even worth a respray lol, for a professional to do it would probably cost 15k because of all of the dings and stufd but I was keen for a side project. Also solved the problem of being bored haha. But with the rust yeah I can always fix that in the future, not a huge issue for me. I found out yesterday that when a dent is created a high spot is created around it (the crown) and to fix it I either need to tap the edges or just sand over it. Which is what made my filler work a bit confusing originally lol.
    • That's some useful information to have , it would be great if we had more local suppliers .
×
×
  • Create New...