Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I attempted to use search for this, but it came up empty.

I searched for a known size, still naught.

Don't think it likes numbers.

So........

Anyone know/ have pics of 18x10.5 +22 on a 32 gtr?

How close are we going to get to guards, suspension?

Justin's 32 gtr would be closest to these spec

http://www.speedhunters.com/2011/03/car_feature_gt_gt_justin_fox_s_r32_gt_r/

He's running abit of camber up front (more than 3 if i remember), he has a build thread on JDMST

If this is the wrong place to ask, let me know and I'll start a new thread!

Will 18x10.5 +22 with 265/35R18 fit an R32 GTR at standard height without issue?

Any modifications required?

What if I want to go lower in the future - say low enough such that the top of tyre is flush with the guard.

Wheels I am looking at are Work S1Rs, so offset is customizable in 1mm increments over a huge range.

Hi guys. Looking at buying a set of 18x9.5+18 F 18x10 +15 R to fit a 33 gtst. Gaurds rolled and pretty much stock hight. Interested in any advice, will they fit? Anyone else running similar spec and any input. TIA

Edited by GTST520

Justin's 32 gtr would be closest to these spec

http://www.speedhunters.com/2011/03/car_feature_gt_gt_justin_fox_s_r32_gt_r/

He's running abit of camber up front (more than 3 if i remember), he has a build thread on JDMST

looks good, thanks for the link :thumbsup:
  • 3 weeks later...

sooooo im looking at ROTA grids.. (yeah yeah but im too povo for TE37's and the stockies are looking a bit tired)

which would fit better on a 34 GTT without flared or rolled guards?

18x8.5 +30 or 18x8.5 + 44?

just looking for a good fitment without any scraping/rubbing/stretching/modifying

(i've tried looking back through all the threads but i cant seem to come up with a simple answer which would fit)

edit:
just found a post from 2006 that was selling a set of LMGT4's which looked alright
(18x8.5 +30 and 18x9.5 +38 if anyone was wondering)
might see about upgrading the rears

Edited by lench

sooooo im looking at ROTA grids.. (yeah yeah but im too povo for TE37's and the stockies are looking a bit tired)

which would fit better on a 34 GTT without flared or rolled guards?

18x8.5 +30 or 18x8.5 + 44?

just looking for a good fitment without any scraping/rubbing/stretching/modifying

(i've tried looking back through all the threads but i cant seem to come up with a simple answer which would fit)

edit:

just found a post from 2006 that was selling a set of LMGT4's which looked alright

(18x8.5 +30 and 18x9.5 +38 if anyone was wondering)

might see about upgrading the rears

Go the 8.5+30. Shouldn't have any issues at all at stock height. Won't be an aggressive fitment at all though. Would be very stock looking.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • That's kind of what I was getting at saying you'd be here soon regarding length etc being able to add additional restriction.  My assumption (possible donkeys of you and mption) is that the length of hose to an oil cooler, and back, isn't going to be that huge of a loss. Typically you're talking about 1.5m of total length. And so far everyone in our world hasn't had issues with oil not being able to get to a cooler and back, it's more been, how the heck do we get the oil out of the head and back down to the bottom? I'd nearly hazard a guess the biggest issue people have with oil cooling and oil supply, is being able to get the heat out at the cooler itself (not enough air flow, too small of a cooler etc) Also, when people mount them wrong and make really awesome air traps so they've dramatically diminished the cooling capacity.
    • I will rebutt this and the preceding point from Dose....but without doing any calcs to demonstrate anything and without knowing that I am right or wrong. But... The flow capacity of a fluid transfer system is not limited by the smallest orifice or section of conduit in that system, unless it is drastically smaller than the rest of the system. OK, I use the word drastically perhaps with too much emphasis, but let's drill down on what I really mean. The flow capacity of the system is the result of the sum of the restrictions of the entire system. So, to make an extreme example, if you have a network with 3" pipe everywhere (and let's say a total length of only a few metres) and that 12mm ID restriction of the oil filter connection being the obvious restriction, then for any given amount of pressure available, the vast majority of all the pressure drop in the system is going to occur in the 12mm restriction. But.... increase the length of the 3" pipeline to, say 1000m, and suddenly the pipe pressure loss will likely add up to either be in the same order of magnitude, possibly even exceeding that of the 12mm restriction. Now the 12mm restriction starts to matter less. Translate this to the actual engine, actual oil cooler hose sizing, etc etc, and perhaps: The pressure loss caused by flowing through the narrow section (being the 12mm oil filter port, and perhaps any internal engine oil flow pathways associated with it) is a certain number. The pressure loss through, say, -12 hoses out to the cooler and back is negligible, but The pressure loss through -10 hoses out to the cooler, at the exact same length as the above, starts to become a decent fraction of the loss through the 12mm stuff at the filter port. Maybe even it starts to exceed it. I could actually do these calcs if I knew 1) how much oil was actually flowing in the line, 2) gave enough of a f**k to do things that I hate doing for work, voluntarily for a hypothetical discussion. Anyway - I reiterate. It's not the narrowest port that necessarily determines how much it can all flow. It is the sum. A long enough length of seemingly fat enough pipe can still cause more loss than a semmingly dominant small bore restriction.
    • To pick up what Dose is putting down. Not a lot of point running a huge hose if the motor is still restricted to the smaller size... It's only capable of flowing so much at that point...   *Waits for GTSBoy to come in and bring in the technicalities of length of pipe, and additional restriction from wall friction etc etc*
    • Hooley Dooley these things have some history! If i sell them they will need a certificate of providence to prove they have been in the hands of verified RB20 royalty! They have been stored in a plastic tub, away from sunlight and moisture. They are in mint condition. And they will stay that way, as i have sprung the money for a set of shockworks coilovers. I'm just working on getting them in at the moment, after rebushing the rear of the car, and while the subframe was out i welded in the GKtech reinforcement bracing as well.  They will get a workout at Ararat King of The Hill in November. I ran 48s on the short course there a few months ago, and i am hoping with new bushes and shocks in the rear i can launch a bit harder. There was a fair bit of axle tramp when i tried too hard off the line. a few of the corners had dips mid way which also made the car feel a bit unsettled, hopefully this will help there too.   
    • Food for thought, the stock oil filter thread is a 3/4-16 UNF, which has an ID of about 10 to 12mm (according to ChatGPT lol). Now compare than to an 10AN, which has an ID of about 14mm (Raceworks is 14.2mm, Speed flow is 14.27mm).  
×
×
  • Create New...