Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

paulr33 that is wat i thort

Cubes yeh champ just speculating but it should go close? wont it?

you could boost it more with 98 with less ping

Mafia how does it drive? when does it boost now?

thats wat i wont out of mine but its an auto

il do the usual mods and get a shitf kit and get the tork converter modded

james

  • Replies 333
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

drives the same until about 5,000rpm, and pulls really hard.. Shame it pings its nuts off in third at about 6,000 rpm

f**ked if I kno whats wrong.

I might drop the exhaust like what paul said, but I seriuosly don't think there is a need because its HUGE anyway.

Forget 98ron fuel, we can't get it here. Closest servo is 4 hours away.

Maybe The ex housing is too small, causing a restriction, and heat, and causing detonation?

I don't know... :D

What ignition timing are you running at wot? (peak torque, mid and higher rpm values)

Cam timing.

Play with the afr's and see where its happy.

Thats where I would be looking assuming compression is good.

Edited by Cubes

im running same gt30 set up as you mafia, it pulled 260rwkws stock engine at 20psi on 98 ron fuel. then had to rebuild the engine with forged internals, put tomei poncams in and dropped static comp from 9to1 to 8.5 to 1, this netted me 277rwkws at 21psi. yes iam also running an aftermarket manifold. will be fitting 4inch magic cat shortly and getting a remap using 100 ron fuel , i think 300rwkws shouldnt be to far away. theres a copy of my dyno graph in shootout mode in the members gallery.

define better results though ? dont loose faith jono, for every problem there is a solution just gotta find it. post up the dyno graph when u can get it and the guys can then go from there to try and debug it further

Don't loose faith bro, this is one of the best build up threads and have followed it intently.

The rewards will be there, and at the moment you are the inspiration behind me finally doing some decent mods to my line seeing as I got it rebuilt with venolia's...and have run STOCK as a rock for almost 6 months now...

Keep up the good work!!

My GT30 with 0.70 comp and 0.86 exhaust housing on custom made highmount manifold and 45mm external gate makes 255rwkw at 1 bar and around 310rwkw at 1.4 bar on 98 ron

With your 0.64 rear you should be getting boost alot earlier than 5000rpm.

aahh this sucks... what a waste of an upgrade..

I am seeing people with 2530s getting much better results..

Dont lose heart mate!

Eventually a solution will be found.........

=)

the problem is fuel... We can't get anything better than 95 ron here. I don't even know if the E10 here is any good. Its supposed to be 96 ron, and the tuner said I should be able to put more timing into it... Now with the ethanol blend petrol, apparently its 91ron petrol with 10% ethanol which makes it equivalent to 96 ron rated fuel. Dunno if its any good though.

pistons is another thing.. Apparently stock pistons are as weak as f**k.

heres food for though also, the tuner said that at 80 knock on the hand controller, he could JUST hear detonation in his headphones.

Also talking to the tuner today he said that these turbo are in their efficiency range at about 20psi+. But they are very touchy and 1-2 psi in the high teens makes a shit load of difference.

I really don't know where to start. I don't want to be running fuel additives all the time... I got sick of having to put toluene in all the time with my normal fuel, but it was much better than standard pump 95.

I mean, f**k, if shell got their ass in gear and released the Shell100 here (premium with 10% ethanol) I'd be laughing... Would be able to wind shitloads of timing into it.

I really am stuck.

Would I be able to make more power safely by taking a little bit of timing out and adding 1-2 psi of boost?

The tuner is very hesitant of putting more boost in..

finally had time to read this thread :)

good work by all accounts

makes sense, i dont see how the stock rb25 can be .04x a/r as the gtr twins are 0.42 a/r

stock turb a 33-t does 200 tops.

stock turb a GTR can get to near 300 So its believable easily.

That turbo is a GT30/TS04 , 7 blades and a .70ARR comp cover . It will be interesting to see how it goes particularly with the VG30 turbine housing .

Cheers  A .

Ya, i was surprised to see that Mafia's turbo uses a 7-blader S wheel as opposed to the GT series 6-blade wheel

I'm really curious as to why these horsepowerinabox/gcg style gt30's don't run the 6blade gt30 core with the .6 comp cover.

I'm thinking possibly GCG ran in to surge issues with the higher flowing 6blade gt30 comp?!?

I'm remembering back to GCG's 500hp bolt ons and the surge issues they had?!?

I dont think so, the 6-blade is the one you want, in the 500hp combo/6 blader is the banger setup that you want

You have surge problems with the BIG GT 6-blade wheel in the 600hp GT 30 variant only... i know because i had ever so slight problems. Going to the smaller comp wheel would have rid the problem, AND given better performance in the end after all the R&D

Bass Junky's wouldn't take any more than 14psi.. ping. :D

NEO runs more compression than non-NEO RB25. Thats why 14psi is limits :)

Drop the comp ratio... Thats really your only option.

You won't notice a drop of .5. Wind a little more boost in and see how it goes.

Thats what i think :)

Back it off a tad, tad more boost and see. You should be seeing 14psi around 4000rpm.

End of the day your fuel is limiting the setup, you know this as well as anyone

Maybe look @ the cost of freighting large drums. I know the tazzie boys ship down drums of Ultimate cause they only have 95 down there are aswell.

Initial cost is a whack but its probably not too much more expensive one would hope.

Bass Junky is not running a GT30, he has a GCG hi-flow with a VG30 ext housing.

I am also running the same turbo, with Tomei Poncams (256 duration[r33]) and head porting. Car made 270rwkw@15psi, on a new dyno dynamics dyno, tunning mode. Externally engine looks stock, apart from fuel reg (but that's also hard to spot).

My engine also started to ping higher in the rev range, this was solved by pulling timing out in that effected area only.

Mafia have you considered cams or even a descent head porting? This will definately release the true potential of the turbo. Honestly, with the fuel, i think that your car is not too bad, but when you have your mind set on a figure i guess you will feel disappointed.

All the best

Al

thanks guys. I was talking to a guy tonight at one of our test and tunes - he said to spend $700 on a good water methanol kit, and that will solve all of my fuel \ ping problems.

Then look at an electronic boost controller to fix the weird boost problems, he said he'd just stick a 15psi actuator on there to make it easier again..

This guy has a 11 second xr6t that he tunes himself.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • My first car was a HG. I'm very familiar with them. A mild cam upgrade is a good idea. The 186 is a very flexible engine - meaning it has good torque from down low. You can give up a little torque down low for quite a lot more excitement in the mid range, and a bit more up top - but they are not exactly a rev monster. You need to upgrade valve springs at the minimum. For a bigger cam, you'd want to make sure it wasn't still running the original fibre cam gear. That would be unlikely, given that most of them shat themselves in the 70s and 80s, but still within the realms of possibility. Metal cam gear required. Carbies are a huge issue. The classic upgrade was always a Holley 350, which works, but is usually pretty bad for fuel consumption. The 186S had a 2 barrel Stromberg on it that was very similar to the one on the 253, and is a reasonable thing if you can find one, and find someone to help you get it set up (which is the same issue with setting up a 350 to work nice). The more classic upgrade was twin sidedraught CD type carbs, or triples of same, or triple Webers. The XU-1 triple Webers being the best example. You can still buy all this stuff new, I think, but it's a lot of coin to drop. And then the people able to set them up are getting fewer and further in between. There's still some, but it used to be everyone's** dad and uncle could do it. **Not everyone's! But a lot. All in all, I wouldn't get too carried away with the engine. Anything you do to it without a full rebuild for power and revs will only make it slightly faster. I am all in favour of a complete teardown rebuild, with nice rods and pistons, 10 or 1.5:1 compression, and a clean port job with at least a big enough cam to run 98 with that compression, if not bigger. And if I did that to a dirty old red motor, I'd want to inject it too, which I'd struggle to fight against the devil on my shoulder that would argue for ITBs and trumpets. But the bills would start to mount up, and it will still never make stupid power. OK, a few people still know how to build absolutely mental red motors, courtesy of the work that went into HQ racing and modern knowledge being applied. But even a 300HP red motor is no match for an RB20 with a TD06. So you have to decide what it's worth to you. I'd just put a set of 6>2>1 extractors, a 2.5" exhaust and an electronic ignition conversion/dizzy on it and just run the old girl like the fairly slow old girl that she really is.
    • Thank you so much for the comments.  This is very interesting and gives me some great ideas to think about. Keen to keep it simple and relatively classic looking. That said, i am not too worried about staying 100% period correct.  A little extra performance and relatively good (or improved) economy is just what i am looking for. Ill be keeping any parts i swap out so if i get nostalgic i can always swap it all back in.  Right now just trying to get some good ideas from people in the know (I still have a lot to learn in this space). Thank you again!  
    • Wrt the engine, you're very much limited by 'production quality' as to how much extra power you can extract from them (I'm talking i6 red-motor) -- a lot here depends on how 'authentic' or 'period correct' you want the modifications to be... ...I'm too old... <grin>...the first true performance engine Holden made, was in the HD/HR models ~ this was the 'X2' performance pack...it came with twin downdraft strombergs on an otherwise unimproved intake manifold, with a two piece exhaust manifold (reckoned to be as good as extractors)... ....these engines were built upon the '179HP' cylinder block, which included extra webbing in the casting to make it stronger and less susceptible to block distortion... The next performance i6 came out with the HK Monaro (also found it's way into the LJ GTR Torana ... the car I wish I hadn't sold)...it had pretty much the same manifold setup, but was built against the '186S' block...this block retained all the extra webbing of the 179HP block, but added a forged steel crankshaft (instead of the stock cast crankshaft), because it was possible to snap the crank... ...apart from the inherent weaknesses in the stock (cast crank) blocks, the next limiting factor is the cylinder head porting & combustion chamber design, and the actual valve sizes. Back in the day, you could buy a 'yella terra' cylinder head (from stage 1 to stage 5 gradients), and this was the way to get serious power out of them -- with the extra breathing of these heads, you could fit a triple SU or DCOE Weber setup... ...obviously, these mods were a waste of time on a stock cylinder head/camshaft grind. My housemate rebuilt the i6 in his VH dunnydore about 6 months back -- this is a 186S block with the 12port 2850 blue motor head and intake/exhaust manifolds, with a dual throat Weber off an XF Falcon mounted on an adapter plate ; it's not a bad makeup...got more torque & fuel economy just light-footing it about on the first throat, but stand on it and it makes more giddy-up than the standard 2850 blue motor that it replaced. Personal note: I'd just fit an RB30 and be done it it 😃  
    • Thanks for sharing. That's a great video! My buddy is doing the same thing on his build (S chassis struts and towers). He's building an S14 with billet RB30 shooting for 2000whp... a race car with a TH400 just like this video. For a road car I just couldn't go this route as the strut has to be almost vertical and the caster is not going to pivot correctly (let alone camber gain). You think the R32 frontend is bad, wait till you put a MacPherson strut on without modeling it all in Solidworks to check geometry. I'm not saying it's a bad way to do it but I'd be really curious to see how it affects the geometry.
    • Hey Christof and welcome!  Sounds like an awesome project! I'm not sure many of the regular users on here would know much about the HK but I could be wrong.  Looking forward to updates.
×
×
  • Create New...