Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 333
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

mate i think u need to fly SK up north get him to tune it on your tuners dyno lol...if anyone can fix your problem its him mate. The man is worth his weight in gold easily.

Personally i reckon you should go for that injection kit, if it works on your mates 375kw supra it should at least help you reach your power goal on the rb. you only had like what 30-40kw to go. Or wait for god knows how long till you can get higher octane fuel. Mate times like this i bet you lived in brisbane (for the fuel ofcourse).

Good luck with this hey, its dissappointing to do that work to your car and not get the power you want. Breaks ya heart.

Your ign. map has been completely played with.

Maybe running so much more ign. over std impacts negatively on fuel consumption.

A couple of little strange things have been done with the fuel map.

Generally one will zero out the injector correction and rework the fuel map. It appears he's left some injector correction in there but also played with the fuel map. There also appears to be rather large variations in fueling at some load points.

Your not drawing much air either, it appears your using up to load points 16.

Mine with a crapp vg30det turbo running 12-13psi hits load point 16-17 and at a guess is making around 200rwkw.

Bl4ck32's R32 is running a small rb20det high flow running 16psi, that makes around 220rwkw using load points 17-18. The rb20det high flow has a very small turbine housing yet he is able to run upwards of 18degree's at wot.

A couple of questions.

What size injectors are you running?

Did you have the plenum on with the std 210rwkw turbo?

Edited by Cubes

my ign map hasn't been modified no where near that much either.

ive modified the first 10x10 ish cells my self and then theres a few cells on loda point 16 that have changed a little, the rest is the stock map

Paulr33,

Where your airflow percentages all set to 100% (Settings 3 tab)?

I had to set them all to 100% in order for everything to run nice.

Also.. Bl4ck32's car had an initial issue running the VH41 AFM.

Upon selecting the VH41 it simply would not run, pumping out shiet loads of fuel. It was tuned to suit using the std rb20/25 afm setting.

Then we attached the datalogit to it, init the pfc and for some reason it began working fine on the vh41 setting.

Definitely a little quirk there. :P

Paulr33,

Where your airflow percentages all set to 100% (Settings 3 tab)?

I had to set them all to 100% in order for everything to run nice.

Also.. Bl4ck32's car had an initial issue running the VH41 AFM.

Upon selecting the VH41 it simply would not run, pumping out shiet loads of fuel. It was tuned to suit using the std rb20/25 afm setting.

Then we attached the datalogit to it, init the pfc and for some reason it began working fine on the vh41 setting.

Definitely a little quirk there. :P

post-2054-1134863977.jpg

also i never get over 80deg water temp, usually just under like 76 so i miss out on the last correction factor, so i either have to set the 50deg to 0.0 correction or use the 50deg corr pretty much all the time

When you initially started it and had issues with it being rich.

Did you try setting the airflow percentages to 100%.

Dialing in 370/550 = 68% (round up)

Then selecting VH41.

Paul, I think you will achieve a safer more consistent tune if you were to set the 50degree high load correction factor to 0. Depends how well it drives when cold with the setting.

I'm using the R34 correction factor and as it turns out its basically running 0 at 50degree's. It actually made the car feel much nicer to drive, prior it would feel like it was cold (short choked free rev), now when cold it feels and rev's the same as if it were warm.

Edited by Cubes
well, I'm afraid to say, he's the only decent safe tuner in mackay....

The other mob who I won't mention, have a bad habit of blowing motors to pieces...

Hi Mafia,

Just had a look at your fuel map - I'll post up mine in a few days - interestingly my tuner didn't play with the fuel map much at all.

Just in the areas where it comes onto boost and high load areas.

In the original 210rwkw tune it wasn't touched at all.

I see you reach load point 16 - exactly the same as me with over 250rwkw. At load point 16 you're running 1 degree less timing than me. Bugger about the fuel. It'll be interesting to see how you go if you go ahead with the water methanol injection setup.

In the injection setting under setting we are running all six 550 cc nismos at 68%.

Cheers!

well, I'm afraid to say, he's the only decent safe tuner in mackay....

The other mob who I won't mention, have a bad habit of blowing motors to pieces...

good tuning is invaluable.

I know 2 workshops here in Melb that regularly have guys from Tazzie bring cars (not one or two either) for work.

Tell me that isnt a mission, putting your car onto a boat for gods sake.

If i had to drive half a day, so be it.

well, I'm afraid to say, he's the only decent safe tuner in mackay....

The other mob who I won't mention, have a bad habit of blowing motors to pieces...

Go for a drive to bundaberg or harvey bay and get it tuned.

Even better take some holidays come down to Brisbane and see the guys at mercury or matty down the coast...

There are a few QLD members that have a safe place to plark your car and rest your head for a day or two...

Then we can have a bit of an excuse to have a cruise and a BBQ...

If i had one more bedroom id have ya round...

Hi Mafia,

Just had a look at your fuel map - I'll post up mine in a few days - interestingly my tuner didn't play with the fuel map much at all.

Just in the areas where it comes onto boost and high load areas.

In the original 210rwkw tune it wasn't touched at all.

I see you reach load point 16 - exactly the same as me with over 250rwkw. At load point 16 you're running 1 degree less timing than me. Bugger about the fuel. It'll be interesting to see how you go if you go ahead with the water methanol injection setup.

In the injection setting under setting we are running all six 550 cc nismos at 68%.

Cheers!

So what your saying is your injectors are tuned to inject less because you have better fuel that is less prone to detonation, and I am having to inject much more fuel to stop detonation?

So there is nothing I can do, but run better fuel?

Do you run the same boost as me? Are you able to post up your mods?

THis is very interesting.

Even better take some holidays come down to Brisbane and see the guys at mercury or matty down the coast...

There are a few QLD members that have a safe place to plark your car and rest your head for a day or two...

Then we can have a bit of an excuse to have a cruise and a BBQ...

If i had one more bedroom id have ya round...

Well, I love guns, Futurama, The Simpsons, and I'm seeing a very hot asian chick.. I think we'd get on very well...hehe

So what your saying is your injectors are tuned to inject less because you have better fuel that is less prone to detonation, and I am having to inject much more fuel to stop detonation?

So there is nothing I can do, but run better fuel?

Do you run the same boost as me? Are you able to post up your mods?

THis is very interesting.

Well, I love guns, Futurama, The Simpsons, and I'm seeing a very hot asian chick.. I think we'd get on very well...hehe

No I'm not saying that I'm running less fuel than you - just the fuel map hasn't been altered as much as yours. Injector duty cycle on peak hold reaches 58%.

I'm running 18 psi, spikes to 19 as it comes onto boost.

Mods are

2835pro s

pfc, fc boost control

blitz lm cooler

k&n flat panel air filter stock airbox stock blow off valve

Z32 AFM

3''exh, 4'' cat hks dump

550cc nismos

Big clutch

That's all, everything else stock

If I wanted more power I'd look into nitrous.

Cheers

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I will rebutt this and the preceding point from Dose....but without doing any calcs to demonstrate anything and without knowing that I am right or wrong. But... The flow capacity of a fluid transfer system is not limited by the smallest orifice or section of conduit in that system, unless it is drastically smaller than the rest of the system. OK, I use the word drastically perhaps with too much emphasis, but let's drill down on what I really mean. The flow capacity of the system is the result of the sum of the restrictions of the entire system. So, to make an extreme example, if you have a network with 3" pipe everywhere (and let's say a total length of only a few metres) and that 12mm ID restriction of the oil filter connection being the obvious restriction, then for any given amount of pressure available, the vast majority of all the pressure drop in the system is going to occur in the 12mm restriction. But.... increase the length of the 3" pipeline to, say 1000m, and suddenly the pipe pressure loss will likely add up to either be in the same order of magnitude, possibly even exceeding that of the 12mm restriction. Now the 12mm restriction starts to matter less. Translate this to the actual engine, actual oil cooler hose sizing, etc etc, and perhaps: The pressure loss caused by flowing through the narrow section (being the 12mm oil filter port, and perhaps any internal engine oil flow pathways associated with it) is a certain number. The pressure loss through, say, -12 hoses out to the cooler and back is negligible, but The pressure loss through -10 hoses out to the cooler, at the exact same length as the above, starts to become a decent fraction of the loss through the 12mm stuff at the filter port. Maybe even it starts to exceed it. I could actually do these calcs if I knew 1) how much oil was actually flowing in the line, 2) gave enough of a f**k to do things that I hate doing for work, voluntarily for a hypothetical discussion. Anyway - I reiterate. It's not the narrowest port that necessarily determines how much it can all flow. It is the sum. A long enough length of seemingly fat enough pipe can still cause more loss than a semmingly dominant small bore restriction.
    • To pick up what Dose is putting down. Not a lot of point running a huge hose if the motor is still restricted to the smaller size... It's only capable of flowing so much at that point...   *Waits for GTSBoy to come in and bring in the technicalities of length of pipe, and additional restriction from wall friction etc etc*
    • Hooley Dooley these things have some history! If i sell them they will need a certificate of providence to prove they have been in the hands of verified RB20 royalty! They have been stored in a plastic tub, away from sunlight and moisture. They are in mint condition. And they will stay that way, as i have sprung the money for a set of shockworks coilovers. I'm just working on getting them in at the moment, after rebushing the rear of the car, and while the subframe was out i welded in the GKtech reinforcement bracing as well.  They will get a workout at Ararat King of The Hill in November. I ran 48s on the short course there a few months ago, and i am hoping with new bushes and shocks in the rear i can launch a bit harder. There was a fair bit of axle tramp when i tried too hard off the line. a few of the corners had dips mid way which also made the car feel a bit unsettled, hopefully this will help there too.   
    • Food for thought, the stock oil filter thread is a 3/4-16 UNF, which has an ID of about 10 to 12mm (according to ChatGPT lol). Now compare than to an 10AN, which has an ID of about 14mm (Raceworks is 14.2mm, Speed flow is 14.27mm).  
    • Yep, totally get that. However hooking in for Generator back up is only a few hundred bucks for the wiring. You could put a couple of those in (for different circuits explicitly) and run a couple of baby generators. Bonus, you can balance them across different circuits, and now have backups in your backup. I'm looking at buying places that won't even have water etc, and I don't mind the idea of getting off the electric grid either, even with everything you've said. This country already has enough power outages that even the mains grid isn't that reliable anymore. I do agree though on spending a bit more to get better gear, and to add some extra redundancy in to the system too.
×
×
  • Create New...