Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

This thread is all about the buying, building and using a Tech Edge A/F ratio meter and accesories, I have the following on order;

1 X Wideband 2A0 kit (4.0 cable kit & 7057 connector)

1 X TE-LD02 LED Display kit

1 X 0 258 007 057 LSU sensor

1 X 2A0 to 2A1 upgrade

The all up price is $444 inc GST and postage.

overview.gif

More detail on www.techedge.com.au

Any other guys building, buying or using A/F ratio meteres it would be good to compare our experiences.

:O cheers :)

PS; when I have finished building and testing this unit, it will be available for renting.

Edited by Sydneykid
  • Replies 103
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

SK I've been thinking of making a kit for a while to fine tune the PFC, so good luck and I'm keen to see the results. This one must be alright to interest you so it could be a winner.

Does it specifically need the LSU sensor or can the famed Falcon one from the Silicon chip book be an alternative given JE's findings?

Thanks, for that SK, I was planning on putting one of these together for the PFC. This (and the link) gives me a little more direction. I'll post up my results when I'm done.

Hi guys, I brought the tech edge kit 3 years ago and have brought the later model one 6 months ago. I built both of them and have found them to be excellent in form and function. I output the 0-5v to my FC-Datalogit and datalog AFRS whle I tune on the dyno. Also useful for checking 4WD's on the road as we only have a 2wD Dyno Dynamics dyno at work.

Great product!

Hı SK

Just read your reply ın the other thread AFR'S and good old knock - I purchased the 2e0 kıt about two months ago (about 350AUD ıf I remember rıghtly) but wıll have to waıt untıl december when I arrıve back from overseas to assemble ıt.

It'll be great to compare - I was lookıng at the LM1 from Amerıca but ıt was all gettıng a bıt too expensıve for what we need ıt for.

Cheers

Edited by gtst25

ive got the 2a0 in my car right now rigged up thru the greddy e-01's analog input.

so far works a treat and i can use it to limit boost (well boost other than gate) via the e-01's on board limiters.

its a very nice unit indeed but it does take some time to put together and debug properly, but once all is said and done its mint.

as for the o2 sensor i got mine from the local vw DEALER for 65$USD, pretty forking cheap for a wideband.

Well, I gotta say Tech Edge delivery is pretty good, received my order via Express Post this afternoon. They are not shipping the 7057 lambda sensor any more, I received a 7200 instead. Which is not such a bad thing as rumour has it the 7200 is a bit faster in its response.

Tech_Edge_Delivery.jpg

Tech_Edge_Kit.jpg

I won't have time to start on the kit today, maybe tonight I might lay out the parts and check the intructions thoroughly. The kit doesn't ship with the instructions, you have to download/print them from the web site. Luckily I have good quality colour printer. I will start on the display as it is a little smaller and has less components, so I will have a chance to get used to the terminology used.

;) cheers :D

Edited by Sydneykid

After a couple of hours of soldering and assembly and the LD02 display is finished;

Tech_Edge_LD02_Made.jpg

I was going to make up the cables after I finished the display, but I can't. I ordered and paid for a 4m cable, that connects the lambda sensor to the WB2A1. But when I checked it a 2.6 metre cable was supplied. This is a good chance to check out Tech Edge support and problem recovery. Email sent 3.30 pm Saturday.

;) cheers :)

Edited by Sydneykid
Hı SK

It'll be great to compare - I was lookıng at the LM1 from Amerıca but ıt was all gettıng a bıt too expensıve for what we need ıt for.

Cheers

If you already have a Power FC and FC datalogit you could get the LC-1 which is a plain WB02 which has outputs for standalones. Costs about ~260AUD with sensor.

You really don't need all the extra displays, inputs, etc the expensive WB02's come with. The datalogit or other standalone will already display and and have inputs for whatever you want.

Very impressed with Tech Edge's response to the 2.7 m cable instead of 4.0 m cable error. Sent email advising of problem 3.30 pm Saturday afternoon. Received email response Monday morning at 8.45 am. Promised overnight replacement which arrived today (Tuesday) lunch time via Express Post. A prepaid, addressed, Express Post Envelope was included for me to return the 2.7m cable.

Now that's good recovery from a problem.

:) cheers :)

PS; I have not told Tech Edge that I am writing this review, so this sort of response should be considered what anyone will receive.

Edited by Sydneykid
nice work Gary. looking good mate. how many WB02 sensors/meters do you need!!!:)

We sold one with a race car recently, so this is a replacement. We only have 2, the other one is a Motec which stays in the dyno room (under pain of death).

Why did you get the 2AO instead of the more compact 2CO controller?

I wanted the 1meg of data logging.

:) cheers :)

is there any difference again in using the 7057 (7200) over the 6066???

also where on the site do you order the DIY kit?

Currently working on a diagnostics unit for facotry ECU's that was in Elector magazine (if anyones interested), once thats done i'll be onto one of these, albeit a 2E0

we have one i a 4agze rally car and as previously mentioned had some response issues with the lambda sensor we were originally running the 6066 and upgraded to the 7057 and there was a markable difference so I would say the 7200 will be better again. Initially had some problems with noise and interference again I think it was contributed to the sensor, also moved the unit to a more secure position. Awesome bit of gear for tuning a rally car which are more tempremental to climates (full rain days to desert racing with 40+), and also mid range power and low down torque are more important as there is so much more on off throttle, and this is where we were able to make gains rather than sit on the dyno for hours trying to simulate real driving or just doing full power runs for tuning!!!

I know I am no wizard at making up cables, so I figured I had better do that early in the assembly process. So last night I made up all of the cables;

Tech_Edge_Cables_Made.jpg

The PC cable was pretty easy, only the 9 pin plug had to be attached. I used a cigarette lighter plug and cable I had lying around for the power cable, just soldered the 2A1 plug on the end of the cable. The cable for the lambda sensor is quite tricky, the instructions are good, but many pages when printed out. I had to refer back to the TE web site a couple of times, as the instructions printing doesn't include the attachments/links. So I had to go back and print each one of those separately, that was time consuming.

I think TE must believe that I would be making up the kits in front of my PC, but that's not the case. I don't fancy soldering and heat shrinking on my desk in the office.

Tonight I will get into making the 2A1 itself.

;) cheers :)

Edited by Sydneykid

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
    • You are all good then, I didn't realise the port was in a part you can (have!) remove. Just pull the broken part out, clean it and the threads should be fine. Yes, the whole point about remote mounting is it takes almost all of the vibration out via the flexible hose. You just need a convenient chassis point and a cable tie or 3.
×
×
  • Create New...