Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

post pics of the queer lancer kris

"who cares, you've owned a car faster than his will probably ever be, and you've obviously matured past the boy racer stage. he pretty much has no job now, so his car will be up for sale shortly" - Annon

Well after owning a 250rwkw car and going through EPA and all that bullshit ive decided to go for economy and a bit of a comfortable ride that wont get me police attention!

Here it is:

Back.JPG

Interior.JPG

Seats.JPG

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/140030-the-new-car/
Share on other sites

  • Replies 43
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Oooh - same wing as me :P

evo1.jpg

Lol yup! Even though it took them a day to put it on properly! Sif they havent done it b4!

Same everything.......oh sorry except for 4 wheel drive plus a few :( bits and pieces....lol

Not to mention the whole front looks different to the evo!

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/140030-the-new-car/#findComment-2609752
Share on other sites

lower, zorst... better rims... i will dig it moreso dude

it isnt actually as bad as i had first imagined when you told me. like.. it doesnt look all that gay. actually looks ok

them seats do look pretty comfy. swap the skyline seats for em lol

lmao @ anonymous. f**k your a queer c**t. go get mummy to pay for more mods big homie. emphasis on the big.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/140030-the-new-car/#findComment-2610720
Share on other sites

hahaha

honestly why sell an R33 turbo to get a NA lancer if you're a performance car enthusiast?? listen to us all on SAU.. we all deal with the cops who hate modified cars. its something you deal with for the love of driving...

so are you a skyline or car enthusiast?

did you even have a choice in the matter or did you dad sell the R33 and buy this for you?

the R33 wasn't yours was it?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/140030-the-new-car/#findComment-2611107
Share on other sites

You guys are going to haunt me with the auto thing forever now!!

I was driving around in a manual Lancer in Syd, and just gave back a hire Getz.. Any manual 4cyl is loads of fun on the street. You can rev them hard and your not doing anything dangerous...good fun. An auto means its simply going to be a nice quiet car to A to B in....which means you will be retired whilst im scooping up dog shit from driveways because cars have left me broke ;)

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/140030-the-new-car/#findComment-2611191
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • For once a good news  It needed to be adjusted by that one nut and it is ok  At least something was easy But thank you very much for help. But a small issue is now(gearbox) that when the car is stationary you can hear "clinking" from gearbox so some of the bearing is 100% not that happy... It goes away once you push clutch so it is 100% gearbox. Just if you know...what that bearing could be? It sounding like "spun bearing" but it is louder.
    • Yeah, that's fine**. But the numbers you came up with are just wrong. Try it for yourself. Put in any voltage from the possible range and see what result you get. You get nonsense. ** When I say "fine", I mean, it's still shit. The very simple linear formula (slope & intercept) is shit for a sensor with a non-linear response. This is the curve, from your data above. Look at the CURVE! It's only really linear between about 30 and 90 °C. And if you used only that range to define a curve, it would be great. But you would go more and more wrong as you went to higher temps. And that is why the slope & intercept found when you use 50 and 150 as the end points is so bad halfway between those points. The real curve is a long way below the linear curve which just zips straight between the end points, like this one. You could probably use the same slope and a lower intercept, to move that straight line down, and spread the error out. But you would 5-10°C off in a lot of places. You'd need to say what temperature range you really wanted to be most right - say, 100 to 130, and plop the line closest to teh real curve in that region, which would make it quite wrong down at the lower temperatures. Let me just say that HPTuners are not being realistic in only allowing for a simple linear curve. 
    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
×
×
  • Create New...