Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 251
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

i'm looking at buying one of these

700177-5007

gt3076R

external gate

front trim 56, .60 ar front surge slotted

.84 rear trim, .82 4 bolt rear

i have the option of the .60 or .70 front

is tthere going to be much difference?

my combination at the moment is a standard rb25det

Ive got a 6boost and plazmaman

was recently making 300rwkw on a standard exhaust manifold. 3076R.70 front. .82 rear internal gated

i

everyone is ignoring my post =[

hey mate, you're wasting your time putting a 0.7 compressor cover on this type of GT3076. The 0.6 is surge slotted and flows more than enough for this compressors peak.

0.7 will just make it more laggy, and give you headroom that you can't access and that the compressor can't reach.

Bumping this great thread with my results that are finally here.

Despite what most people advised, i ended up buying a 3071 with the genuine Garrett .82 rear

I absolutely love it; full boost (17psi) by 3600rpm and makes 280rwkw. If i did get the 3076 i still think i'd struggle to make 300 with internal gate. (I firmly did not want to run ext gate)

it was awesome. I had a 0.82 rear on it and didn't like the lag.

Get the 0.63 rear with the slightly bigger internal gate on it, there is a special one you can get. Its still garret, you've just got to ask for it.

I Was running 14psi, 16psi, 18psi, and 20psi without issues, but I recommend water meth injection for 18psi+ on this rear. It helps with the detonation.

And f**k the response was good. with the WMI, I was lighting 1st, 2nd and 3rd, and fishtailing at 100\kmph when I knocked it back to third, and not even having to dump the clutch. Just rolling on the throttle gave it a kick in the ass.

Just make sure you have a good tuner, and good support systems.

Thing is I cbf changing my setup again.. i don't think my injectors or my bank account have much more to give sadly.

If i start to hunt more response down the track, perhaps i'll go the smaller rear. Good to hear that it can be done!

Bumping this great thread with my results that are finally here.

Despite what most people advised, i ended up buying a 3071 with the genuine Garrett .82 rear

I absolutely love it; full boost (17psi) by 3600rpm and makes 280rwkw. If i did get the 3076 i still think i'd struggle to make 300 with internal gate. (I firmly did not want to run ext gate)

Nice Ric, intake held up. :thumbsup:

That 3071 is working hard, now dump some eflex in the tank for us... :yes:

Do you have a graph?

I'm seriously considering buying the GTX3071 with .82 garrett IW rear...

After seeing the negligable difference in response betwenn the GT3076 and GTX 3076 on that subie, i really hope the GTX3071 is the same with slightly more top end and negligable difference in response.

Dreams of this turbo running Eflex :D

  • 4 months later...

I'm seriously considering buying the GTX3071 with .82 garrett IW rear...

After seeing the negligable difference in response betwenn the GT3076 and GTX 3076 on that subie, i really hope the GTX3071 is the same with slightly more top end and negligable difference in response.

Dreams of this turbo running Eflex :D

Does a GTX3076 spool slower compared to a Gt3076? Was the Gt3076 ball bearing?

  • 2 months later...

Thinking back I should have ordered the 0.63 A/R turbine housing on my 76R ad if I can I'll probably exchange it .

As Mr Mafia showed they make pretty good torque on an RB25 and seem to have really good response for a GT30 based IW turbocharger .

A .

  • 3 weeks later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • My thinking is that if the O2 sensor is shot then your entire above described experience is pure placebo.
    • Here is the mess that I made. That filler there was successful in filling dents in that area. But in the middle area. I can feel dents. And I've gone ocer it multiple times with filler. And the filler is no longer there because i accidently sanded it away. I've chased my tail on this job but this is something else lol. So I'm gonna attempt filler one more time and if it doesn't work I'll just high fill primer the door and see where the issues are because guidecoat is of no use atm.
    • Ok, so I think I sort of figured out where I went wrong. So I definitely overthinked it, and I over sanded, which is probably a large part of the problem. to fix it, I ended up tapping some spots that were likely to be high, made them low, filled them in, and I tackled small sections at a time, and it feels a lot better.    I think what confused me as well is you have the bare metal, and some spots darker and some are lighter, and when I run my finger across it, it' would feel like it's a low spot, but I think it's just a transition in different texture from metal to body filler.    When your finger's sliding on the body filler, and crosses over to the bare metal, going back and forth, it feels like it's a low spot. So I kept putting filler there and sanding, but I think it was just a transition in texture, nothing to do with the low or high spot. But the panel's feels a lot better, and I'm just going to end up priming it, and then I'll block it after with guide coat.   Ended up wasting just about all of my filler on this damn door lol  
    • -10 is plenty for running to an oil cooler. When you look at oil feeds, like power steering feeds, they're much smaller, and then just a larger hose size to move volume in less pressure. No need for -12. Even on the race cars, like Duncans, and endurance cars, most of them are all running -10 and everything works perfectly fine, temps are under control, and there's no restrictions.
    • Update: O2 sensor in my downpipe turned out to be faulty when I plugged in to the Haltech software. Was getting a "open circuit" warning. Tons of carbon buildup on it, probably from when I was running rich for a while before getting it corrected. Replaced with new unit and test drove again. The shuffle still happens, albeit far less now. I am not able to replicate it as reliably and it no longer happens at the same RPM levels as before. The only time I was able to hear it was in 5th going uphill and another time in 5th where there was no noticeable incline but applying more throttle first sped it up and then cleared it. Then once in 4th when I slightly lifted the throttle going over a bump but cleared right after. My understanding is that with the O2 sensor out, the ECU relies entirely on the MAP tune and isn't able to make its small adjustments based on the sensors reading. All in all, a big improvement, though not the silver bullet. Will try validating the actuators are set up correctly, and potentially setting up shop time to tune the boost controller on closed loop rather than the open loop it is set to now. Think if it's set up on closed loop to take the O2 reading, that should deal with these last bits. Will try to update again as I go. 
×
×
  • Create New...