Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I heard that a EVO owner who will remain nameless the last time he seen your car take off he turned to the person next to him and goes "now we are in trouble"

So go Giant stick it to 2 the EVO`s

isnt it good that gtr's can have that effect!! :laugh: cheers mate

and yeah evo,s are great, just not as great as gtr's!!

evomick top video !! well done and look forward to meeting you.

cheers russ

p.s did a track day today! and the brakes were fantastic!

  • Replies 150
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

isnt it good that gtr's can have that effect!! :laugh: cheers mate

and yeah evo,s are great, just not as great as gtr's!!

evomick top video !! well done and look forward to meeting you.

cheers russ

p.s did a track day today! and the brakes were fantastic!

What brakes you running??

Weren't hapy with the AP's???

we were having issues with brake vacum loss, & needed to get rid of the vacum booster to get a consistent pedal feel( i actually crashed with no brakes late last year)

a pedal box lets you get rid of the booster and allows for greater adjustment in all areas and gives great feed back through the pedals on braking along with brake bias adjusments.

attached is a pic of the unit fitted.

cheers russ

post-17546-1170507125.jpg

Hopefully you won't have a repeat of that hey Russ. Was the vacum loss basically causing the ABS to play up (which is an issue I seem to get on and off) or was it more of a pedal pressure loss problem?

Anyways regadless it will be good to see you guys out in it again. Although when are you guys going to unvail the R33 mate?

isnt it good that gtr's can have that effect!! :yes: cheers mate

and yeah evo,s are great, just not as great as gtr's!!

evomick top video !! well done and look forward to meeting you.

cheers russ

p.s did a track day today! and the brakes were fantastic!

I love my EVO`s to it just that one of my mates has got one so i need bragging right :rant:

ugh i didnt know it was that black gtr that crashed, i remember watching it at the nsw round last year, clutch in, select's first gear, bang car jaults forwards. ugh such a tough car. i think you ran something like a 10.6 odd with hell old semi's... my mate at work will be there in theyre new evo 9... sock it to him!

Belsil80 the brake pedal when properly setup is firm but has a really great feel to it(so far!!) can lock all four easily if required.

evo cam's car is a weapon thats for sure & it's going to be good to race with him and have some fun too aas that evo is only going to get better.

roy the r33 is slowly getting there hopefully by march it should be up and running everything is pretty much done now except the block which is happening now. we are hoping for a nine second pass on the 1/4 for it's first outing but we will see soon enough. how's your machine going & will ya be at the nsw dutton??

cheers russ

Edited by giant
  • 2 weeks later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Nah, that is hella wrong. If I do a simple linear between 150°C (0.407v) and 50°C (2.98v) I get the formula Temperature = -38.8651*voltage + 165.8181 It is perfectly correct at 50 and 150, but it is as much as 20° out in the region of 110°C, because the actual data is significantly non-linear there. It is no more than 4° out down at the lowest temperatures, but is is seriously shit almost everywhere. I cannot believe that the instruction is to do a 2 point linear fit. I would say the method I used previously would have to be better.
    • When I said "wiring diagram", I meant the car's wiring diagram. You need to understand how and when 12V appears on certain wires/terminals, when 0V is allowed to appear on certain wires/terminals (which is the difference between supply side switching, and earth side switching), for the way that the car is supposed to work without the immobiliser. Then you start looking for those voltages in the appropriate places at the appropriate times (ie, relay terminals, ECU terminals, fuel pump terminals, at different ignition switch positions, and at times such as "immediately after switching to ON" and "say, 5-10s after switching to ON". You will find that you are not getting what you need when and where you need it, and because you understand what you need and when, from working through the wiring diagram, you can then likely work out why you're not getting it. And that will lead you to the mess that has been made of the associated wires around the immobiliser. But seriously, there is no way that we will be able to find or lead you to the fault from here. You will have to do it at the car, because it will be something f**ked up, and there are a near infinite number of ways for it to be f**ked up. The wiring diagram will give you wire colours and pin numbers and so you can do continuity testing and voltage/time probing and start to work out what is right and what is wrong. I can only close my eyes and imagine a rat's nest of wiring under the dash. You can actually see and touch it.
    • So I found this: https://www.efihardware.com/temperature-sensor-voltage-calculator I didn't know what the pullup resistor is. So I thought if I used my table of known values I could estimate it by putting a value into the pullup resistor, and this should line up with the voltages I had measured. Eventually I got this table out of it by using 210ohms as the pullup resistor. 180C 0.232V - Predicted 175C 0.254V - Predicted 170C 0.278V - Predicted 165C 0.305V - Predicted 160C 0.336V - Predicted 155C 0.369V - Predicted 150C 0.407V - Predicted 145C 0.448V - Predicted 140C 0.494V - Predicted 135C 0.545V - Predicted 130C 0.603V - Predicted 125C 0.668V - Predicted 120C 0.740V - Predicted 115C 0.817V - Predicted 110C 0.914V - Predicted 105C 1.023V - Predicted 100C 1.15V 90C 1.42V - Predicted 85C 1.59V 80C 1.74V 75C 1.94V 70C 2.10V 65C 2.33V 60C 2.56V 58C 2.68V 57C 2.70V 56C 2.74V 55C 2.78V 54C 2.80V 50C 2.98V 49C 3.06V 47C 3.18V 45C 3.23V 43C 3.36V 40C 3.51V 37C 3.67V 35C 3.75V 30C 4.00V As before, the formula in HPTuners is here: https://www.hptuners.com/documentation/files/VCM-Scanner/Content/vcm_scanner/defining_a_transform.htm?Highlight=defining a transform Specifically: In my case I used 50C and 150C, given the sensor is supposedly for that. Input 1 = 2.98V Output 1 = 50C Input 2 = 0.407V Output 2 = 150C (0.407-2.98) / (150-50) -2.573/100 = -0.02573 2.98/-0.02573 + 47.045 = 50 So the corresponding formula should be: (Input / -0.02573) + 47.045 = Output.   If someone can confirm my math it'd be great. Supposedly you can pick any two pairs of the data to make this formula.
    • Well this shows me the fuel pump relay is inside the base of the drivers A Pillar, and goes into the main power wire, and it connects to the ignition. The alarm is.... in the base of the drivers A Pillar. The issue is that I'm not getting 12v to the pump at ignition which tells me that relay isn't being triggered. AVS told me the immobiliser should be open until the ignition is active. So once ignition is active, the immobiliser relay should be telling that fuel pump relay to close which completes the circuit. But I'm not getting voltage at the relay in the rear triggered by the ECU, which leaves me back at the same assumption that that relay was never connected into the immobiliser. This is what I'm trying to verify, that my assumption is the most likely scenario and I'll go back to the alarm tech yet again that he needs to fix his work.      Here is the alarms wiring diagram, so my assumption is IM3A, IM3B, or both, aren't connected or improper. But this is all sealed up, with black wiring, and loomed  
×
×
  • Create New...