Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 74
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

..... I have since heard it now has an RB30 with bigger single, but based on the results of lots of GTRs of late could have reverted to twins as last time i heard it out at PI it didnt sound like it was running a single.

Last time at PI (Oct 07) Sam told me it's standard capacity not 3ltr and with the bonnet up it had a single hanging off it.

Its basically a std GTR with bolt ons. Nothing special or too different from factory :) What is scary that the Racepace R33 has been bumper to bumper with the thing the one time i saw them on the track together. Big thing is R32 is a neat track only car. The RPM R33 is a damn road car with full interior, air con the works. Both are just very impressive cars

  • 2 weeks later...
  • 2 weeks later...
Its basically a std GTR with bolt ons. Nothing special or too different from factory :D What is scary that the Racepace R33 has been bumper to bumper with the thing the one time i saw them on the track together. Big thing is R32 is a neat track only car. The RPM R33 is a damn road car with full interior, air con the works. Both are just very impressive cars

The car is far from a "std GTR with bolt ons". I guess its not possible to see all of the mods and development underneath the car. Keep a lookout for the times when it next hits the track.....they should be quite an improvement on the past times. :D

I know this is a GTR thread, but just to give the the quick Victorian GTR's some inspiration, Sam has run a 1min 29sec in a naturally aspirated M3 (about 240-250rwkw) at Winton. (This is one of his customers cars) :D

Edited by G_T_R
I know this is a GTR thread, but just to give the the quick Victorian GTR's some inspiration, Sam has run a 1min 29sec in a naturally aspirated M3 (about 240-250rwkw) at Winton. (This is one of his customers cars) :D

WOW, that's flying!!!!!

Are these BMW's road registered cars or race cars with stripped interiors/cage/slicks etc....

The car is far from a "std GTR with bolt ons". I guess its not possible to see all of the mods and development underneath the car. Keep a lookout for the times when it next hits the track.....they should be quite an improvement on the past times. :blink:

I know this is a GTR thread, but just to give the the quick Victorian GTR's some inspiration, Sam has run a 1min 29sec in a naturally aspirated M3 (about 240-250rwkw) at Winton. (This is one of his customers cars) :(

LOL...i know. I was being silly, most of the quick Vic GTR guys joke that their cars are pretty std. So was joking that Sams car is std.

I would love to know more about the M3. Doesnt Sam's GTR only do 1:31s? It was a while since i saw it run at Winton, so may have gone quicker since, but to get a 29 out of an NA M3? Thats the sort of pace you egt from most of the 996 Cup Cars in the state series, with the quickest doing 1:26s, but most of are in the 28s and 29s. So thats mega impressive from an M3

I remember speaking to Sam at PI last year and he was saying the problem with the GT-R's is mid-corner speed (due to weight) which is why the BMW is so much faster around Winton. He said the mid-corner capabilites of that car destoyed the GT-R.

I remember speaking to Sam at PI last year and he was saying the problem with the GT-R's is mid-corner speed (due to weight) which is why the BMW is so much faster around Winton. He said the mid-corner capabilites of that car destoyed the GT-R.

That explanation does not make sense to me, unless the Beemer is ultra light and the GT-R stock weight.

I remember speaking to Sam at PI last year and he was saying the problem with the GT-R's is mid-corner speed (due to weight) which is why the BMW is so much faster around Winton. He said the mid-corner capabilites of that car destoyed the GT-R.

Well considering the GTR is pretty stripped and probably weighs in the early 1300kgs, say maybe 1330kg and runs decent sized 17" rims and tyres. The M3 would want to have been on a dramatic diet, is it an E30 or E36? Because E36s are no lightweights to start with, a friend has stripped his and done some decent mods to his and he is still heavy, simply because BMW built the car the way they are. The Aus Spec E36 M3R was still 1290kgs. of course you can still get a fair bit out of that...

So anything is possible, but i would love to know more about the car. I did read in a BMW event review that Sams E36 did a 1:34 either last year or late 2006, as that is the pin up lap time for me and a rwd car at Winton. But G_T_R is saying it was a customers car so would be interested to know the differences between Sam E36 and this customers car as 5 seconds is a huge difference.

The BMW E30 Group A and E36 Super Tourers were ~940 kgs, that's with all steel panels and the cast iron bottom end 4 cylinder engines (2.3, 2.5 and 2.0 litre). The all alloy engines were lighter and the cars carried ballast as a result. The weight distribution was a perfect 50/50 and CoG was VERY low. It's not always the absolute weight that matters, it's where that weight is concentrated.

Cheers

Gary

Just to clarify......it is an E36 M3, na 240rwkw, customers car but driven by Sam and it is probably the same car that Roy mentioned doing a 1:34 in 2006. The car has seen quite a bit of development (ie the 5 sec inprovement at Winton)by SM Motorsport and there is still a bit more to come.....as with his own GTR. :)

Just to clarify......it is an E36 M3, na 240rwkw, customers car but driven by Sam and it is probably the same car that Roy mentioned doing a 1:34 in 2006. The car has seen quite a bit of development (ie the 5 sec inprovement at Winton)by SM Motorsport and there is still a bit more to come.....as with his own GTR. :)

That's an awesome effort, just as quick as his GTR...

Pretty sure he's done a 1:29 in the GTR???

To go from a 1:39 to 1:34 is a good effort. To go from 1:34 to 1:29 is a huge achievement. Hats off to Sam, he obviously knows how to screw a hell of a lot from a saloon. Its basically race car stuff.

I would lvoe to have the knowledge and money to throw the book at an R32 GTSt. I personally think its a greta platform for a 1050kg animal :D

Hmmm, there is nothing magic about a M3, twoWD will lose every time to fourWD, everything else being roughly equal. I'm calling, ummmm, 'misinformation', maybe for commercial reasons, not unusual :P

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Slow when hot could also be because its getting more dynamic compression, OR things are getting a bit tighter once it is all expanded. If it were an earthing issue, typically I'd expect you to have it have issues all the time. Unless it's really a combination of both things. Where the higher compression, and things being a bit tighter, is giving that bit of extra load and you do need a slight clean up on the cables/connections.
    • Yeah, this is one of the most annoying things about nissan part numbers... I've got an unrelated example... Image is of the AT output shaft ~ they have the same part#, but clearly the shaft on the left is beefier design to that on the right ...the difference (essentially) is the 'lighter' shaft on the right, is for engines up to RB25DE (this includes RB20 variants) : the shaft on the left is for RB25/26DET(T)....are they interchangeable? Yes...but obviously one shaft is going to be stronger than the other...and, the lighter shaft is around USD115, but the heavier shaft closer to USD150...same part#... ...epc-data usually tells a tale ~ the amayama listing for 39100-23U60 has a note "Longest side is between 60 and 105 cm" ; no such info is there for 39100-23U70 ...and given the great disparity in price between the 2 parts, it makes me at least curious (to the point of caution) where the 'extra money' went? ...ie; these 2 parts have a cost difference that (to myself at least) isn't explained by 'plastic boot'...ie; with amayama there's AUD700 price difference ...plastic versus rubber?...I'm not seeing it like that...and 60cm ~ 105cm...??...that's a huge disparity....something hinky going on here... I'd try searching by VIN, not model... /2cents
    • I don't know for sure, but I'd expect them all to be interchangeable given the diff end and hub end don't move/change between any C34 series. Often Nissan will change part numbers and the aftermarket follows those year ranges; but the original part number change doesn't mean other parts won't fit. The change could be a change in material, internal parts or even just supplier. For example, all the RB gearbox to engine bolts are no longer available and there is a new part number instead. The only change is they went from cadmium plated bolts to zinc plated due to the issues manufacturing with Cadmium. They look different but work the same.
    • One year is a bit concerning. Did you try contacting GSP? It says 5 year warranty on the box if I remember correctly. I'm also running their driveshafts on my S2 Stagea.   You could check the part numbers on Amayama for your year. Here's the link for my 1998 which gives the 39100-23U60 part number. Well, that and 39100-23U70. https://www.amayama.com/en/genuine-catalogs/epc/nissan-japan/stagea/wgnc34/6649-rb25det/trans/391 What does it say for yours?
    • I ordered a GSP Front R/H Axle from here - https://justjap.com/products/gsp-premium-front-driveshaft-r-h-nissan-r32-r33-r34-skyline-gtr-stagea-4wd#description It lasted around a year before one of the boots blew out. I'm lowered, but I have GKTech roll center adjusters. One year seems a little premature. I think I'm going to spend the extra money on an OEM cv axle this time. This website - https://tfaspeed.com/collections/nissan-stagea-wgnc34-x-four-parts/products/nissan-stagea-awc34-260rs-rb26-right-front-axle-drive-assembly Makes it sound like the readily available OEM CV axle will only fit 11.1999 Stagea and up (mine is a 2.1997 S1). The JustJap listing didn't mention any years or anything for the GSP axle. Amayama shows '11.1999' and up as well for that part number. As well as 'plastic boot type'. See attached picture. So I guess my question is, does that axle (39100-23U60) really only fit S2 Stagea? It's the front driver side. If it does, I'd love to buy that instead of rolling the dice on another GSP. I've found that OEM one cheaper here: https://www.partsfornissans.com/oem-parts/nismo-jdm-r32-r33-r34-skyline-gtr-r32-gts4-right-front-axle-3910023u60 and here https://www.nissanparts.cc/oem-parts/nismo-shaft-ft-drive-3910023u60 Just a little confused because the JapSpeed listing for the GSP front driver axle doesn't mention any specific years or anything and it fit my S1 Stagea fine. So will 39100-23U60 fit my S1 Stagea even though technically it says '11.1999' and up? What would have changed? Thanks.  
×
×
  • Create New...