Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Here are the official numbers...

9 km/l (11.1 l/100km)for 2.5t AWD vs 10 km/l (duhh 10 l/100km) for 2.5 Di AWD.

here is the full list.

post-20696-1263528538_thumb.jpg

Haven't driven a VQ25dd so I don't personally know.

Will check "official" numbers tonight/tomorrow :(

  • 1 month later...

i'm quite heavy on the foot and i seem to get around 450km's out of a tank..

and i am running VERY rich :ninja: (plops quite alot)

once the PowerFC gets installed it should bump that figure up a bit more :P

got my RS Four S down to ~ 10.5L/100kms of 95% highway (to the Hunter Valley), but averages out to around 13.5L/100km around town (air con always on pretty much)

not amazing, but not too bad

EDIT - pretty much 100% stock car

Edited by Stooge007

So these things have a 68L tank? Im getting around 400 per tank, or a bit less depending on how spririted I drive it :)

Also, contemplating a Power FC over an SAFC. Been told SAFC are ok, but not the best to do as it just messes with the true MAF/MAP reading. Take much to get a PFC tuned for economy and WOT power?

Might have to also try this Boost98 :blink:

{edit} just found they also sell a new one 'Premium 100'

Edited by JZZ20
got my RS Four S down to ~ 10.5L/100kms of 95% highway (to the Hunter Valley), but averages out to around 13.5L/100km around town (air con always on pretty much)

not amazing, but not too bad

EDIT - pretty much 100% stock car

forgot to add, running on either Vortex 98 or Optimax

premium 100??? where sells that?

That's what im running until the new injectors come for the e85. I get the same economy on the 100 octane as the BP98 I used to fill with.

United are the only suppliers left I think.

That's what im running until the new injectors come for the e85. I get the same economy on the 100 octane as the BP98 I used to fill with.

United are the only suppliers left I think.

oh ok i havnt noticed. can you feel any sort of performance gain? and is how much more a litre is it on average than bp98 which is what i use

oh ok i havnt noticed. can you feel any sort of performance gain? and is how much more a litre is it on average than bp98 which is what i use

It sells for around the price of BP 98, I run it to stop the ping I was occasionally getting. I am able to bump up the boost a bit more now, if I want.

According to United, the fuel is at least 100, usually 102 octane.

The standard ecu will probably loose economy with it, my mates XR6t did, due to the ethanol content.

Also, contemplating a Power FC over an SAFC. Been told SAFC are ok, but not the best to do as it just messes with the true MAF/MAP reading. Take much to get a PFC tuned for economy and WOT power?

Dont you dare put a SAFC on a 26 unless your really stripped for cash.... Its not hard to find a power fc for that car. Do it once do it right. You;ll find many stag drivers get the safc sitc combo as they have an auto and are restriced to computer changes with out spending big coin :)

E85 would be best, and at 99c bugger the economy. Lucky the M35 has an 80 liter tank. :devil:

Works out about the same anyway.

E85 is 25% cheaper than PULP98 and you use ~20-25% more of it.... but it is much cleaner and allows for a much more aggressive tune :)

Hmmm, well for me it works like this:

More boost = :) = more boost = :huh: = more boost = poor fuel economy :)

I'm still getting a minimum of 13L/100kms driving to work and back (at least 40% of the trip is spent cruising at constant 50 or 60km/h - so not exactly heavy traffic). If I drive it how I like to drive it, its closer to 14L/100km. Not a big difference...and the driving satisfaction outweighs the extra fuel cost IMO. :)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Hope you aren't too sore after that one, might take a day or 2 to notice yet and I guess it is a loooooong drive home. On the bright side, tube frame front end is a thing at superlap, right?
    • https://www.facebook.com/share/p/18rmVb1SKB/ 
    • The chart of front pressure to rear pressure (with one being on the x axis and the other being on the y axis) is not a straight line on a typical proportioning valve. At lower pressures there is a straight line with one slope, and at higher pressures that changes to a lower slope. That creates a bend in the line at that pressure, called the knee point. If you do not change the proportionng as the pressure gets higher, you will suffer excessive pressure (at one end of the car or the other, depending on which way you look at the proportioning action) and then get lockups at that end. The HFM BM57, from my memory of previous discussions, is based on the BM57 from a different car (to a Skyline), with a different requirement for the location of the knee point and the distribution of pressure front to rear, and so is not a good choice for an upgrade on a Skyline. Here's a couple of links to some old posts, one from here, one from elsewhere. A lot of it pertains to adjustable prop valves, but the idea is the same. There are plenty of discussions on here about this issue from al the many years of people wanting a cheap/accessible option. https://grassrootsmotorsports.com/forum/grm/learn-me-brake-proportioning-valves/236880/page1/ https://grassrootsmotorsports.com/forum/grm/learn-me-brake-proportioning-valves/236880/page1/  
    • Yeah dunno why johhny posted that here with no context, just post on FB/insta bro where he put it up?  Laine had an off at T4 during Thurs prac, he's ok, car is less than perfect, they are done for the weekend, he can fill in the rest. Bando also binned it like 100m up the road.   
    • I feel there must have been a FB/insta post and the weekend did not start well at all I hope everyone is all okay
×
×
  • Create New...