Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Here are the official numbers...

9 km/l (11.1 l/100km)for 2.5t AWD vs 10 km/l (duhh 10 l/100km) for 2.5 Di AWD.

here is the full list.

post-20696-1263528538_thumb.jpg

Haven't driven a VQ25dd so I don't personally know.

Will check "official" numbers tonight/tomorrow :(

  • 1 month later...

i'm quite heavy on the foot and i seem to get around 450km's out of a tank..

and i am running VERY rich :ninja: (plops quite alot)

once the PowerFC gets installed it should bump that figure up a bit more :P

got my RS Four S down to ~ 10.5L/100kms of 95% highway (to the Hunter Valley), but averages out to around 13.5L/100km around town (air con always on pretty much)

not amazing, but not too bad

EDIT - pretty much 100% stock car

Edited by Stooge007

So these things have a 68L tank? Im getting around 400 per tank, or a bit less depending on how spririted I drive it :)

Also, contemplating a Power FC over an SAFC. Been told SAFC are ok, but not the best to do as it just messes with the true MAF/MAP reading. Take much to get a PFC tuned for economy and WOT power?

Might have to also try this Boost98 :blink:

{edit} just found they also sell a new one 'Premium 100'

Edited by JZZ20
got my RS Four S down to ~ 10.5L/100kms of 95% highway (to the Hunter Valley), but averages out to around 13.5L/100km around town (air con always on pretty much)

not amazing, but not too bad

EDIT - pretty much 100% stock car

forgot to add, running on either Vortex 98 or Optimax

premium 100??? where sells that?

That's what im running until the new injectors come for the e85. I get the same economy on the 100 octane as the BP98 I used to fill with.

United are the only suppliers left I think.

That's what im running until the new injectors come for the e85. I get the same economy on the 100 octane as the BP98 I used to fill with.

United are the only suppliers left I think.

oh ok i havnt noticed. can you feel any sort of performance gain? and is how much more a litre is it on average than bp98 which is what i use

oh ok i havnt noticed. can you feel any sort of performance gain? and is how much more a litre is it on average than bp98 which is what i use

It sells for around the price of BP 98, I run it to stop the ping I was occasionally getting. I am able to bump up the boost a bit more now, if I want.

According to United, the fuel is at least 100, usually 102 octane.

The standard ecu will probably loose economy with it, my mates XR6t did, due to the ethanol content.

Also, contemplating a Power FC over an SAFC. Been told SAFC are ok, but not the best to do as it just messes with the true MAF/MAP reading. Take much to get a PFC tuned for economy and WOT power?

Dont you dare put a SAFC on a 26 unless your really stripped for cash.... Its not hard to find a power fc for that car. Do it once do it right. You;ll find many stag drivers get the safc sitc combo as they have an auto and are restriced to computer changes with out spending big coin :)

E85 would be best, and at 99c bugger the economy. Lucky the M35 has an 80 liter tank. :devil:

Works out about the same anyway.

E85 is 25% cheaper than PULP98 and you use ~20-25% more of it.... but it is much cleaner and allows for a much more aggressive tune :)

Hmmm, well for me it works like this:

More boost = :) = more boost = :huh: = more boost = poor fuel economy :)

I'm still getting a minimum of 13L/100kms driving to work and back (at least 40% of the trip is spent cruising at constant 50 or 60km/h - so not exactly heavy traffic). If I drive it how I like to drive it, its closer to 14L/100km. Not a big difference...and the driving satisfaction outweighs the extra fuel cost IMO. :)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Have a look at that (shitty) pic I posted. You can see AN -4 braided line coming to a -4 to 1/8 BSPT adapter, into a 1/8 BSPT T piece. The Haltech pressure sender is screwed into the long arm of the sender and factory sender (pre your pic) into the T side. You can also see the cable tie holding the whole contraption in place. Is it better than mounting the sender direct to your engine fitting......yes because it removes that vibration as the engine revs out 50 times every lap and that factory sender is pretty big. Is it necessary for you......well I've got no idea, I just don't like something important failing twice so over-engineer it to the moon!
    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
×
×
  • Create New...