Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

yeah half cage is ok, I have a full cage for mine, but the front half gave me the shits on the street as the drivers side 'leg' is pretty close to the throttle and kind of annoyed me, but it was definately much better with the full cage. so if you are getting a cage I say go full cage with front half removable. Car is a little stiffer with the cage and if I roll it over it should hopefully stop me dieing. plus it gives me a handy spot to mount my camera! :D

if your still free and in the country...come whoop all our asses in rd3 of the state championships! 29th and 30th september.

I would rather be beaten by another nissan then a stupid toyota.

Now now Michael, thats not very nice of you. You've hurt my poor cars feelings now...

wow...im suprised your on here buddy.

this is my territory...you cant come on here in nissan country. I dont hang out on supra forums and what not.

but its true...id rather be beaten by a nissan then a toyota.

Cheers Angus!

Are there any good places in Sydney to have chat with about the cages?

hey mate west side mufflers at padstow.

they will do whatever you like when it comes to cages, they do alot of approved cages for race cars from all different classes

9773 7244

Edited by Angus Smart
specs John?

Angus,

Cheers mate!

Car-

1993 Toyota JZX90 Mark2

Engine-

1.5JZGTE 445rwhp @ 18psi

JE 86.5mm forged pistons

HKS 264 degree intake and exhaust cams

GReddy 1.4mm metal headgasket

Titan vernier cam gears

Custom plenum chamber

Nissan VH45 throttle body

Power FC

GReddy front mount cooler

HKS T04R turbo kit

Sard 650cc injectors

Custom 85mm radiator

GReddy oil cooler and remote filter

Blitz twin plate clutch

R154 5 speed gearbox

Suspension-

TEIN Circuit Master coilovers

Cusco front upper camber arms

Cusco tower bars front and rear

Ikeya Formula rear upper camber arms

D-Max rose-joint rear suspension kit

TRD LSD 4.3 ratio

Alcon 4 piston front calipers, 343mm rotors

Supra 2 piston rear calipers, 324mm rotors

Braided brake lines

Performance- Qld Raceway

National circuit- 1 min 16.3 sec

Clubman circuit- 57.22 sec

Sprint circuit- 54.36 sec

Sportsman circuit- 54.14 sec

Edited by Stupid Toyota

Car-

1993 Toyota JZX90 Mark2

Engine-

1.5JZGTE 445rwhp @ 18psi

JE 86.5mm forged pistons

HKS 264 degree intake and exhaust cams

GReddy 1.4mm metal headgasket

Titan vernier cam gears

Custom plenum chamber

Nissan VH45 throttle body

Power FC

GReddy front mount cooler

HKS T04R turbo kit

Sard 650cc injectors

Custom 85mm radiator

GReddy oil cooler and remote filter

Blitz twin plate clutch

R154 5 speed gearbox

Suspension-

TEIN Circuit Master coilovers

Cusco front upper camber arms

Cusco tower bars front and rear

Ikeya Formula rear upper camber arms

D-Max rose-joint rear suspension kit

TRD LSD 4.3 ratio

Alcon 4 piston front calipers, 443mm rotors

Supra 2 piston rear calipers, 324mm rotors

Braided brake lines

Performance- Qld Raceway

National circuit- 1 min 16.3 sec

Clubman circuit- 57.22 sec

Sprint circuit- 54.36 sec

Sportsman circuit- 54.14 sec

VERY VERY NICE !!!

AWSOME LAP TIMES TOO!!!

There the kind of lap times we need to get to.

Fantastic job

cheers russ

HA! i knew it, its the nissan throttle body thats making the toyota so fast!

I agree 100% definatley the Nissan throttle body helping with the speed. Very impressive lap times there will look forward to seeing your car in action sometime soon. I hope i can match or better those times when my car is finnished (depending on driver skill) as it will be a bit demoralizing being beaten by a toyota little own a bright pink one. :)

update.

no more main parts yet! :)

windows are here, dash is in and wired (finishing of the stack set up)

seat and pedal box in, need doors and suspension!

BTW car may be on show at the tokyo autosalon in January! haha somehow i dont think it will look as good as the new 2008 gtr launch!

cheers russ

still on track for 15th hopefully (shakedown only though)

Car-

1993 Toyota JZX90 Mark2

Engine-

1.5JZGTE 445rwhp @ 18psi

JE 86.5mm forged pistons

HKS 264 degree intake and exhaust cams

GReddy 1.4mm metal headgasket

Titan vernier cam gears

Custom plenum chamber

Nissan VH45 throttle body

Power FC

GReddy front mount cooler

HKS T04R turbo kit

Sard 650cc injectors

Custom 85mm radiator

GReddy oil cooler and remote filter

Blitz twin plate clutch

R154 5 speed gearbox

Suspension-

TEIN Circuit Master coilovers

Cusco front upper camber arms

Cusco tower bars front and rear

Ikeya Formula rear upper camber arms

D-Max rose-joint rear suspension kit

TRD LSD 4.3 ratio

Alcon 4 piston front calipers, 343mm rotors

Supra 2 piston rear calipers, 324mm rotors

Braided brake lines

Performance- Qld Raceway

National circuit- 1 min 16.3 sec

Clubman circuit- 57.22 sec

Sprint circuit- 54.36 sec

Sportsman circuit- 54.14 sec

Awesome times, Slicks or semi slicks??

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
    • Nah, that is hella wrong. If I do a simple linear between 150°C (0.407v) and 50°C (2.98v) I get the formula Temperature = -38.8651*voltage + 165.8181 It is perfectly correct at 50 and 150, but it is as much as 20° out in the region of 110°C, because the actual data is significantly non-linear there. It is no more than 4° out down at the lowest temperatures, but is is seriously shit almost everywhere. I cannot believe that the instruction is to do a 2 point linear fit. I would say the method I used previously would have to be better.
    • When I said "wiring diagram", I meant the car's wiring diagram. You need to understand how and when 12V appears on certain wires/terminals, when 0V is allowed to appear on certain wires/terminals (which is the difference between supply side switching, and earth side switching), for the way that the car is supposed to work without the immobiliser. Then you start looking for those voltages in the appropriate places at the appropriate times (ie, relay terminals, ECU terminals, fuel pump terminals, at different ignition switch positions, and at times such as "immediately after switching to ON" and "say, 5-10s after switching to ON". You will find that you are not getting what you need when and where you need it, and because you understand what you need and when, from working through the wiring diagram, you can then likely work out why you're not getting it. And that will lead you to the mess that has been made of the associated wires around the immobiliser. But seriously, there is no way that we will be able to find or lead you to the fault from here. You will have to do it at the car, because it will be something f**ked up, and there are a near infinite number of ways for it to be f**ked up. The wiring diagram will give you wire colours and pin numbers and so you can do continuity testing and voltage/time probing and start to work out what is right and what is wrong. I can only close my eyes and imagine a rat's nest of wiring under the dash. You can actually see and touch it.
    • So I found this: https://www.efihardware.com/temperature-sensor-voltage-calculator I didn't know what the pullup resistor is. So I thought if I used my table of known values I could estimate it by putting a value into the pullup resistor, and this should line up with the voltages I had measured. Eventually I got this table out of it by using 210ohms as the pullup resistor. 180C 0.232V - Predicted 175C 0.254V - Predicted 170C 0.278V - Predicted 165C 0.305V - Predicted 160C 0.336V - Predicted 155C 0.369V - Predicted 150C 0.407V - Predicted 145C 0.448V - Predicted 140C 0.494V - Predicted 135C 0.545V - Predicted 130C 0.603V - Predicted 125C 0.668V - Predicted 120C 0.740V - Predicted 115C 0.817V - Predicted 110C 0.914V - Predicted 105C 1.023V - Predicted 100C 1.15V 90C 1.42V - Predicted 85C 1.59V 80C 1.74V 75C 1.94V 70C 2.10V 65C 2.33V 60C 2.56V 58C 2.68V 57C 2.70V 56C 2.74V 55C 2.78V 54C 2.80V 50C 2.98V 49C 3.06V 47C 3.18V 45C 3.23V 43C 3.36V 40C 3.51V 37C 3.67V 35C 3.75V 30C 4.00V As before, the formula in HPTuners is here: https://www.hptuners.com/documentation/files/VCM-Scanner/Content/vcm_scanner/defining_a_transform.htm?Highlight=defining a transform Specifically: In my case I used 50C and 150C, given the sensor is supposedly for that. Input 1 = 2.98V Output 1 = 50C Input 2 = 0.407V Output 2 = 150C (0.407-2.98) / (150-50) -2.573/100 = -0.02573 2.98/-0.02573 + 47.045 = 50 So the corresponding formula should be: (Input / -0.02573) + 47.045 = Output.   If someone can confirm my math it'd be great. Supposedly you can pick any two pairs of the data to make this formula.
×
×
  • Create New...