Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 369
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

OK SAU update from the Prologue. Let me know if I've missed anyone....

14 901 Alford Farmer 2007 Nissan GTR R35 CM14 03:22.78

22 979 Wooster Kulhanek 2001 Nissan Skyline GT-R V-spec II N1 CM23 03:25.71

34 895 Manion Manion 1995 Nissan Skyline GT-R V-Spec N1 BM23 03:29.30

46 808 Leemhuis Handley 1993 Nissan Skyline GT-R V-Spec N1 BM23 03:32.64

52 803 Thatcher Plenderlith 1993 Nissan Skyline GT-R V-Spec N1 BM23 03:34.58

101 984 Johnston Stoneman 2007 Mitsubishi Lancer Evo 9 CM22 04:06.78

well done everyone! (everyone that is except TT who wishes he still had his skyline :P hope everythings OK mate)

Hey Dunc - we made it too believe it or not!

Car 814 1990 r32 gtr - we ran 3:48.09 today with a couple of noob moments that cost us about 10 seconds.

Been meaning to do the rounds just been so busy - hopefully get a chance out there tomorrow.

Good luck all!

sorry guys I will include both in future update.

cooler pipes were nothing but trouble for us until we switch to silicon kits with those truck t style clamps. never had an issue since. I'm sure those guys will sort it and be straight back on their game.

Paul - re n00b moments, if I learnt anything last year it is that there are heaps of n00b moments ahead in the next 5 days. Don't overdrive, keep your car on the black stuff and you will have a blast. Our only goal was to finish, we were running around 50th until we went out and that was fine for me.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
    • Nah, that is hella wrong. If I do a simple linear between 150°C (0.407v) and 50°C (2.98v) I get the formula Temperature = -38.8651*voltage + 165.8181 It is perfectly correct at 50 and 150, but it is as much as 20° out in the region of 110°C, because the actual data is significantly non-linear there. It is no more than 4° out down at the lowest temperatures, but is is seriously shit almost everywhere. I cannot believe that the instruction is to do a 2 point linear fit. I would say the method I used previously would have to be better.
    • When I said "wiring diagram", I meant the car's wiring diagram. You need to understand how and when 12V appears on certain wires/terminals, when 0V is allowed to appear on certain wires/terminals (which is the difference between supply side switching, and earth side switching), for the way that the car is supposed to work without the immobiliser. Then you start looking for those voltages in the appropriate places at the appropriate times (ie, relay terminals, ECU terminals, fuel pump terminals, at different ignition switch positions, and at times such as "immediately after switching to ON" and "say, 5-10s after switching to ON". You will find that you are not getting what you need when and where you need it, and because you understand what you need and when, from working through the wiring diagram, you can then likely work out why you're not getting it. And that will lead you to the mess that has been made of the associated wires around the immobiliser. But seriously, there is no way that we will be able to find or lead you to the fault from here. You will have to do it at the car, because it will be something f**ked up, and there are a near infinite number of ways for it to be f**ked up. The wiring diagram will give you wire colours and pin numbers and so you can do continuity testing and voltage/time probing and start to work out what is right and what is wrong. I can only close my eyes and imagine a rat's nest of wiring under the dash. You can actually see and touch it.
×
×
  • Create New...