Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi all,

My turbo standard R33 turbo is dying and one of the replacement options I'm considering is the ATP stage 2 hiflow. I have been searching but I can't really find a great deal of info on them. Now surely there are a few of you out there who have used them. If so can you please post up your experiences with them. Mods and a power graph would be great for comparison.

I am fairly sure that I'll need to upgrade my standard injectors if I go this way or use an adj fuel pressure regulator (less preferred option)

Thanks.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/195703-atp-r33-stage-2-hiflow-turbo/
Share on other sites

Ok guys I can give you some insight on specs, etc.

ATP do not make a stage 1 or stage 3 high flow. They do, however make a stage 3. Don't ask me why it's like that, I don't know!

Basically, the housings (that you supply) are machined out to fit much larger compressor and exhaust wheels. The core is a new T3 item, oil and water cooled. It is a standard bush bearing core. The exhaust and compressor wheels are found in Sierra Cosworths. When 'highflowed' to these specs, they are commonly known as Sierra-Sierra turbos. They are rated at 450hp.

You will be looking at around $1495 to get this done.

Speak to Kyp Matheou.

9569 4764

ATP

1198 Dandenong Road

Murrumbeena 3163

I'm guessing it's not a bad turbo to have, and I looked into them when I was looking at getting mine high flowed. I bit the bullet and bought a GCG highflow instead. The ball bearing new garret core of those things (basically the same specs, exhaust, comp wheels, etc) was too much of a benefit for my application. They aren't cheap though, $1900.... :worship:

Scott, I may have to disagree with some of the stuff you said..

I talked to Kyp the other day and said there are about 8 different stage turbos from him for the RB25DET.

Stage 1 - uses standard RB25 compressor, Garrett Core and ex turbine ~ 200rwkw [ ~ $1320 ]

Stage 2 - uses bigger than standard compressor wheel, Garrett Core and ex turbine (back cut) ~ low 200rwkw range (my guess 220or so) [ ~ $1430 ]

Stage 3 - about 250rwkw. Can remember what the turbo consisted of. [ ~ $1680 ]

I didn't bother asking about any further ones as they don't interest me.

I can't remember whether I asked if they use bush, roller, or ball bearing core. I assumed ball bearing but I don't like assuming. I should probably ask Kyp and clear it up.

The power figures above are approx figures Kyp gave but they will vary between dynos, how much boost you're running and accompanying mods.

You could quite easily make 200rwkw on the stock turbo with supporting mods....There are quite a few members here doing so. I think with a budget around the $2500 mark and up Id be looking GT-RS if I was in your position. No messing around then, its proven, even has nice little pictures to help you install it yada yada yada.....

Not for me to say what you should do but some interesting facts .

Firstly , I doubt very much they use the actual motorsport compressor used in the RS500's turbo and it was just a tarted up Garrett compressor modded to make it hang together at high revs for extended periods . It would not be a responsive thing in a road car .

Secondly , the RS500's turbo is a dog . The only thing thats any good (and only if you use a TA34 style turbine) is the turbine housing because of its redesigned integral wastegate and vent path .

Your calls but I'd be trying to find the HKS T3 flanged IW GT28 turbine housing , they were fitted to 2530's , 2540's and the RB specific GT-RS . Once you have that any of the better GT25/28 BB cartridges will bolt on .

Cheers A .

Thanks for the input guys.. I will have to research a bit more me thinks.

I currently have 180rwkw with std turbo, basic mods, bleedvalve (12psi), PFC. I know I can make "200rwkw" but this does depend on the tune and especially the DYNO.

I don't want the turbo to stick out like dogs balls when I pop the hood so that's why I have been looking at the hiflow options. I haven't been looking at the 250rwkw mark as I thought it might be a bit of overkill for the street and daily driver. I am also worried about increasing the lag too much over standard. Saying that I figure I will need to either upgrade injectors or FPR and AFM for anything between 200rwkw to 250rwkw anyway.

Thanks Discopotato, I haven't looked where I could find all of these parts yet but I will do my best.

Edited by Fry_33

Apologies Scott.. I don't know why but I talked to Kyp today and he says he only does a stage 3 version??? I feel like a moron, but I was just saying what I was told and wrote down, weird.

Looks like the Stage 3 is rated up to 250rwkw @ 15psi, depending on your mods etc. ~$1680 changeover.

It uses a bush bearing core deisgned by Kyp. He tried roller bearing core with this setup in the past but it created compressor surge.

He will mod your oil lines and banjo bolts etc as well.

i have the same mods as you and make the same power. i'm thinking to get a 25/40 or GT-RS

group buy? haha

After the misinformation about the ATP turbo I started to look around at a few more. Not because the ATP turbos wouldn't be any good but it will give a different result to the one I'm after. I am now looking at getting a 2530, should allow me to get around the 220-230rwkw mark. Sounds like they are a very responsive turbo. I read a few posts that said the 2540 uses the same turbine as the 2530 but the compressor of the 2540 isn't matched as well to the turbine as the one in the 2530. I think it was Gary (SydnetKid) that mentioned this as well. I think they ended up not going with the 2540 for this reason and made the GT-RS.

Apologies Scott.. I don't know why but I talked to Kyp today and he says he only does a stage 3 version??? I feel like a moron, but I was just saying what I was told and wrote down, weird.

Looks like the Stage 3 is rated up to 250rwkw @ 15psi, depending on your mods etc. ~$1680 changeover.

It uses a bush bearing core deisgned by Kyp. He tried roller bearing core with this setup in the past but it created compressor surge.

He will mod your oil lines and banjo bolts etc as well.

No problems :nyaanyaa:

When I spoke to him on the phone he gave me different answers that when I went in the see him.

Hey Phil,

For your purpose i would also recommend a good second hand 2530 or 2535, but make sure they have the right flange and are NOT the sr/rb26 turbos (smaller).

Kyp was not lying when he stated that the bb hi-flows surge. The 2nd hand hi-flow i purchased (and discussed with you) was bb and had chronic compressor surge at light throttle. It was a good thing that the guy i sold it too (warned him before purchase) loved the "dose" sound and thought it was "cool".

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
    • Nah, that is hella wrong. If I do a simple linear between 150°C (0.407v) and 50°C (2.98v) I get the formula Temperature = -38.8651*voltage + 165.8181 It is perfectly correct at 50 and 150, but it is as much as 20° out in the region of 110°C, because the actual data is significantly non-linear there. It is no more than 4° out down at the lowest temperatures, but is is seriously shit almost everywhere. I cannot believe that the instruction is to do a 2 point linear fit. I would say the method I used previously would have to be better.
    • When I said "wiring diagram", I meant the car's wiring diagram. You need to understand how and when 12V appears on certain wires/terminals, when 0V is allowed to appear on certain wires/terminals (which is the difference between supply side switching, and earth side switching), for the way that the car is supposed to work without the immobiliser. Then you start looking for those voltages in the appropriate places at the appropriate times (ie, relay terminals, ECU terminals, fuel pump terminals, at different ignition switch positions, and at times such as "immediately after switching to ON" and "say, 5-10s after switching to ON". You will find that you are not getting what you need when and where you need it, and because you understand what you need and when, from working through the wiring diagram, you can then likely work out why you're not getting it. And that will lead you to the mess that has been made of the associated wires around the immobiliser. But seriously, there is no way that we will be able to find or lead you to the fault from here. You will have to do it at the car, because it will be something f**ked up, and there are a near infinite number of ways for it to be f**ked up. The wiring diagram will give you wire colours and pin numbers and so you can do continuity testing and voltage/time probing and start to work out what is right and what is wrong. I can only close my eyes and imagine a rat's nest of wiring under the dash. You can actually see and touch it.
    • So I found this: https://www.efihardware.com/temperature-sensor-voltage-calculator I didn't know what the pullup resistor is. So I thought if I used my table of known values I could estimate it by putting a value into the pullup resistor, and this should line up with the voltages I had measured. Eventually I got this table out of it by using 210ohms as the pullup resistor. 180C 0.232V - Predicted 175C 0.254V - Predicted 170C 0.278V - Predicted 165C 0.305V - Predicted 160C 0.336V - Predicted 155C 0.369V - Predicted 150C 0.407V - Predicted 145C 0.448V - Predicted 140C 0.494V - Predicted 135C 0.545V - Predicted 130C 0.603V - Predicted 125C 0.668V - Predicted 120C 0.740V - Predicted 115C 0.817V - Predicted 110C 0.914V - Predicted 105C 1.023V - Predicted 100C 1.15V 90C 1.42V - Predicted 85C 1.59V 80C 1.74V 75C 1.94V 70C 2.10V 65C 2.33V 60C 2.56V 58C 2.68V 57C 2.70V 56C 2.74V 55C 2.78V 54C 2.80V 50C 2.98V 49C 3.06V 47C 3.18V 45C 3.23V 43C 3.36V 40C 3.51V 37C 3.67V 35C 3.75V 30C 4.00V As before, the formula in HPTuners is here: https://www.hptuners.com/documentation/files/VCM-Scanner/Content/vcm_scanner/defining_a_transform.htm?Highlight=defining a transform Specifically: In my case I used 50C and 150C, given the sensor is supposedly for that. Input 1 = 2.98V Output 1 = 50C Input 2 = 0.407V Output 2 = 150C (0.407-2.98) / (150-50) -2.573/100 = -0.02573 2.98/-0.02573 + 47.045 = 50 So the corresponding formula should be: (Input / -0.02573) + 47.045 = Output.   If someone can confirm my math it'd be great. Supposedly you can pick any two pairs of the data to make this formula.
×
×
  • Create New...