Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I know one thing for sure. The car has the best inner guards ever ! They alone make it the best GTR in the country :P (seriously, they are trick)

A vote for AUSSIE ENGINEERING!!!!

borland_les.jpg

Actually, this car is a pin up for a locally developed GTR. Velo seats, Harrop brakes, V8 Supercar rear wing when at the track....there seems to be a trend to stay away from the normal Japanese parts bin?!?!?!?!?!?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/206406-rb29-wow/page/5/#findComment-3660201
Share on other sites

  • Replies 241
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

I know one thing for sure. The car has the best inner guards ever ! They alone make it the best GTR in the country :P (seriously, they are trick)

A vote for AUSSIE ENGINEERING!!!!

borland_les.jpg

Actually, this car is a pin up for a locally developed GTR. Velo seats, Harrop brakes, V8 Supercar rear wing when at the track....there seems to be a trend to stay away from the normal Japanese parts bin?!?!?!?!?!?

another good one Roy...time after time Croydon's have been sent cars from XXXX (insert well known japanese tuning house) by Autostyle and a few other importers.... only for them to be not only poorly set-up but tuned like a dogs breky. People please take a good note of what has been said here. Yes the Japanese do things well, but just because XXXX has built the car does not mean its the perfect car. In most instances...far from it. A handful of Aussie tuners/builders can do it better than them...id match Racepace/Croydon/Godzilla/Berry-Newman teams against most of what Japan has to offer. We already proved this 15 years ago when Gibson Motorsport was the world leader. Nismo asked them not to bring their cars over to Japan to compete due to the fear of being humiliated.

Torque graph Ben ?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/206406-rb29-wow/page/5/#findComment-3660313
Share on other sites

Nice work Gary. I'm pretty sure a lot of that is wrong though. Except for the last bit.

But then the only person who really knows is the big fella. Even then I'm not 100% convinced he even remembers what has been done. Because every time he's done something to the car I've returned to find he's pulled it all apart again. LOL

There are only a few options to achieving 2.95 litres, you are limited in the bore size. Being 86 mm standard, 86.5 mm oversize, normally used for ensuring straight and parrallel bores and 87 mm about as big as you want to go. Although there are few alive at 87.5 mm, but that an unnecessary risk that I wouldn't take. From there the stroke is easy to work out, simple high school maths. Once you know the stroke and that it has an RB26 block (tall or short), then the rod length is again a simple subtraction. Getting short custom rods made is expensive and unnecessary as you can more easily and cheaply select the gudgeon pin height. Such that the piston doesn't hit the spark plug. Plus the rod stroke ratio is pretty terrible anyway and shorter rods would just make it worse. Up to here it's just mathematics, the camshaft timing is the real tricky part, it depends on the valve sizes and porting, So my guess (272/280) is simply based on what my past RB30DET power curves look like, hence it is a 100% guess.

Lots of fun for all

Cheers

Gary

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/206406-rb29-wow/page/5/#findComment-3660353
Share on other sites

There are only a few options to achieving 2.95 litres, you are limited in the bore size. Being 86 mm standard, 86.5 mm oversize, normally used for ensuring straight and parrallel bores and 87 mm about as big as you want to go. Although there are few alive at 87.5 mm, but that an unnecessary risk that I wouldn't take. From there the stroke is easy to work out, simple high school maths. Once you know the stroke and that it has an RB26 block (tall or short), then the rod length is again a simple subtraction. Getting short custom rods made is expensive and unnecessary as you can more easily and cheaply select the gudgeon pin height. Such that the piston doesn't hit the spark plug. Plus the rod stroke ratio is pretty terrible anyway and shorter rods would just make it worse. Up to here it's just mathematics, the camshaft timing is the real tricky part, it depends on the valve sizes and porting, So my guess (272/280) is simply based on what my past RB30DET power curves look like, hence it is a 100% guess.

Lots of fun for all

Cheers

Gary

I reckon you have almost got it sussed...except for the turbo's...even a 2.9 wont bring RS's on like that. Gav's 2.8 is proof of that.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/206406-rb29-wow/page/5/#findComment-3660371
Share on other sites

I reckon you have almost got it sussed...except for the turbo's...even a 2.9 wont bring RS's on like that. Gav's 2.8 is proof of that.

they may with some clever head work/manifolding

im with SK on this one, i cant see it being RB30 based, i rkn RB26 block with a mix-n-match storker kit, with at least one of the 3 components being custom, most lilely pistons or rods. cams would be big, my guess would be around the 256/64 mark, a little smaller than what SK said but with a smooth 900rpm idle, even with the ebst tuning getting cams like that to idle at 900 would be a stretch (i think so anyway, i have nowhere near the experience of SK)

i reckon all that low down power and torque is from manifolding and headwork, thats the 'secret' area.

so is this gonna be revealed at all anyway, or are we just stabbing in the dark for no reason? c'mon.... at least give us a hint? tell us whose closest to the real deal? please...... :rofl:

Edited by VB-
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/206406-rb29-wow/page/5/#findComment-3660533
Share on other sites

Hey guys,

I really don't mind sharing the shortblock specs, as I'm fairly sure I've posted details on here a while back.

Bore is 86mm

Stroke is 84mm

Rods are SR20

Its a liner/spacer-plate RB26 block (ala OS RB30), 20mm taller than std.

cheers,

Ben

Im amazed there is an 86mm bore RB26 block left in the country :rofl:

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/206406-rb29-wow/page/5/#findComment-3660729
Share on other sites

Its a liner/spacer-plate RB26 block (ala OS RB30), 20mm taller than std.

Haha - that was the bit I knew. (Sorry Gary but it wasn't my place to say exactly what was wrong).

I also know what the turbo's are unless he changed them again and they aren't GT-RS (although he did test them I'm pretty sure).

The one thing I've found with Ben is you take what you think you know to be right and discard it because he seems to get great results by doing things completely different to everyone else.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/206406-rb29-wow/page/5/#findComment-3660980
Share on other sites

:) ummm steve. spun bearing.... oily car. remember that day...... teeheee.

lol yeah i remember, but i got back out there as the bearing hadnt quite spun yet :banana:

In the end it didnt spin anyway ;)

I thought you would remind me of that day

I know one thing for sure. The car has the best inner guards ever ! They alone make it the best GTR in the country :D (seriously, they are trick)

Pics/details please?

I reckon you have almost got it sussed...except for the turbo's...even a 2.9 wont bring RS's on like that. Gav's 2.8 is proof of that.

Garrett -10's?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/206406-rb29-wow/page/5/#findComment-3661514
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • That's kind of what I was getting at saying you'd be here soon regarding length etc being able to add additional restriction.  My assumption (possible donkeys of you and mption) is that the length of hose to an oil cooler, and back, isn't going to be that huge of a loss. Typically you're talking about 1.5m of total length. And so far everyone in our world hasn't had issues with oil not being able to get to a cooler and back, it's more been, how the heck do we get the oil out of the head and back down to the bottom? I'd nearly hazard a guess the biggest issue people have with oil cooling and oil supply, is being able to get the heat out at the cooler itself (not enough air flow, too small of a cooler etc) Also, when people mount them wrong and make really awesome air traps so they've dramatically diminished the cooling capacity.
    • I will rebutt this and the preceding point from Dose....but without doing any calcs to demonstrate anything and without knowing that I am right or wrong. But... The flow capacity of a fluid transfer system is not limited by the smallest orifice or section of conduit in that system, unless it is drastically smaller than the rest of the system. OK, I use the word drastically perhaps with too much emphasis, but let's drill down on what I really mean. The flow capacity of the system is the result of the sum of the restrictions of the entire system. So, to make an extreme example, if you have a network with 3" pipe everywhere (and let's say a total length of only a few metres) and that 12mm ID restriction of the oil filter connection being the obvious restriction, then for any given amount of pressure available, the vast majority of all the pressure drop in the system is going to occur in the 12mm restriction. But.... increase the length of the 3" pipeline to, say 1000m, and suddenly the pipe pressure loss will likely add up to either be in the same order of magnitude, possibly even exceeding that of the 12mm restriction. Now the 12mm restriction starts to matter less. Translate this to the actual engine, actual oil cooler hose sizing, etc etc, and perhaps: The pressure loss caused by flowing through the narrow section (being the 12mm oil filter port, and perhaps any internal engine oil flow pathways associated with it) is a certain number. The pressure loss through, say, -12 hoses out to the cooler and back is negligible, but The pressure loss through -10 hoses out to the cooler, at the exact same length as the above, starts to become a decent fraction of the loss through the 12mm stuff at the filter port. Maybe even it starts to exceed it. I could actually do these calcs if I knew 1) how much oil was actually flowing in the line, 2) gave enough of a f**k to do things that I hate doing for work, voluntarily for a hypothetical discussion. Anyway - I reiterate. It's not the narrowest port that necessarily determines how much it can all flow. It is the sum. A long enough length of seemingly fat enough pipe can still cause more loss than a semmingly dominant small bore restriction.
    • To pick up what Dose is putting down. Not a lot of point running a huge hose if the motor is still restricted to the smaller size... It's only capable of flowing so much at that point...   *Waits for GTSBoy to come in and bring in the technicalities of length of pipe, and additional restriction from wall friction etc etc*
    • Hooley Dooley these things have some history! If i sell them they will need a certificate of providence to prove they have been in the hands of verified RB20 royalty! They have been stored in a plastic tub, away from sunlight and moisture. They are in mint condition. And they will stay that way, as i have sprung the money for a set of shockworks coilovers. I'm just working on getting them in at the moment, after rebushing the rear of the car, and while the subframe was out i welded in the GKtech reinforcement bracing as well.  They will get a workout at Ararat King of The Hill in November. I ran 48s on the short course there a few months ago, and i am hoping with new bushes and shocks in the rear i can launch a bit harder. There was a fair bit of axle tramp when i tried too hard off the line. a few of the corners had dips mid way which also made the car feel a bit unsettled, hopefully this will help there too.   
    • Food for thought, the stock oil filter thread is a 3/4-16 UNF, which has an ID of about 10 to 12mm (according to ChatGPT lol). Now compare than to an 10AN, which has an ID of about 14mm (Raceworks is 14.2mm, Speed flow is 14.27mm).  
×
×
  • Create New...