Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

flushing oil does thin down the oil though which does make it drain easier/better..I do it often but not always..and you dont need to put it in with different oil just put it in your engine with your old and run for 10 minutes before you drain

Undo sump plug, go have beer, cup-of-tea, have a chillax, change filter etc... Then do up plug and keep going.

Prolly would skip that step.

Some people swear by it, but it's not necessary if you're using decent oil and changing it regularly. Not all carbon deposits in the engine are the "devil", any deposits for example smoothing out imperfections in the cylinder lining will be removed, which will subtract from engine performance and longevity.

Agreed, but I think he's referring to flushing out the old oil using motor oil, not an engine flush/detergent.

why would an rb need an oil flush? there probably one of the cleanest engines you'll find in most cases..

if anyones interested , been using the royal purple now for 4000kms, no oil usage and still a nice brown tinge, good oil pressure too :thumbsup:

why would an rb need an oil flush? there probably one of the cleanest engines you'll find in most cases..

if anyones interested , been using the royal purple now for 4000kms, no oil usage and still a nice brown tinge, good oil pressure too :thumbsup:

My RP, in the same car, came out better looking than my sougi. Doing another change today. After this last bottle of sougi, Ill be giving motul 300v a try.

for what its worth - last change i let my rb25det drain for an hour - was barely dripping (1 drip from the drain hole evey 20-30 seconds) took the used oil bucket away - chucked another bucket underneath and left it for another 8 hours (went to sleep)checked the bucket in the morning, i was amazed, there was a considerable amount of oil that had still drained into the bucket.. at a guess id say 250ml .. its a bit overkill for 250ml or so..

What's your idea of "better"?

It wasn't as black and burnt looking and didn't smell as strong. They don't smell like burnt oil, just a very petrol smell in them but it was stronger in the sougi oil. Maybe its the difference between the viscosity of the oil?

Viscosity can be a factor, but Sougi is a detergent heavy oil and is commonly mistaken for having "burnt" or "broken down" due to the black appearance. The reality is closer to it having done something of a flush to your engine. I've seen the oil turn black after 1000km in a perfectly healthy engine...far from broken down. Of more concern to me, would be an oil that looks the same coming out as it did going in - after 5000km of high temperatures in a carbon heavy, high revving engine. This being said, Royal Purple is a very good oil, so I'm not at all saying anything to the contrary...it's just that misdiagnosis of oil condition is common when using rules of thumb such as colour or smell. Keeping in mind a burnt smell can be misleading too, when oil is a vessel for removing buildup and contaminants, which are the result of combustion - texture is probably much more important. All this being said, it is very unlikely for any oil to have broken down or burnt unless you have exposed it to severe operating conditions or maintained a service interval for too long.

Hai guise, probably will be changing my oil tomorrow :].

From reading various pages of this thread, I have come to believe Sougi is the way to go :O.

But M5000 is no longer made (neither is S6000 which seemed more than I need anyway?), so I'm thinking of using Syn-X 3000, 10w40? Car is R34 N/A btw. Would this be sweet?

Ty for any advice :cheers:

Viscosity can be a factor, but Sougi is a detergent heavy oil and is commonly mistaken for having "burnt" or "broken down" due to the black appearance. The reality is closer to it having done something of a flush to your engine. I've seen the oil turn black after 1000km in a perfectly healthy engine...far from broken down. Of more concern to me, would be an oil that looks the same coming out as it did going in - after 5000km of high temperatures in a carbon heavy, high revving engine. This being said, Royal Purple is a very good oil, so I'm not at all saying anything to the contrary...it's just that misdiagnosis of oil condition is common when using rules of thumb such as colour or smell. Keeping in mind a burnt smell can be misleading too, when oil is a vessel for removing buildup and contaminants, which are the result of combustion - texture is probably much more important. All this being said, it is very unlikely for any oil to have broken down or burnt unless you have exposed it to severe operating conditions or maintained a service interval for too long.

what do you mean by carbon heavy? with 5000km changes and premium oils and fuels why would there be much carbon in the engine?

what do you mean by carbon heavy? with 5000km changes and premium oils and fuels why would there be much carbon in the engine?

You should have seen my spark plugs after 300km. I was rich as f**k, this shit was snow flaking off. This lasted for about 800km so this could also have altered the colour of the oil coming out and he probably means that say per km of driving, an aging/modded RB will produce more carbon in comparison to other cars. Quite normal I believe for a modded engine running richer fuel mixtures. The more fuel you burn, the more carbon deposits there will be. I too wasn't saying sougi was a bad oil, but as you said, I misread the oil just going by the old bull you hear about the darker it is the more burnt it is. I feel good knowing that it is cleaning my engine.

Hai guise, probably will be changing my oil tomorrow :].

From reading various pages of this thread, I have come to believe Sougi is the way to go :O.

But M5000 is no longer made (neither is S6000 which seemed more than I need anyway?), so I'm thinking of using Syn-X 3000, 10w40? Car is R34 N/A btw. Would this be sweet?

Ty for any advice :cheers:

pm birds, he has some left i'm thinking.

i'll be grabbing another few bottles of his stock when my allowance comes in.

what do you mean by carbon heavy? with 5000km changes and premium oils and fuels why would there be much carbon in the engine?

All engines run rich, that carbon build up in various places, oil removes it. I think I've read a few times that rb engines are particularly carbon heavy, not sure if that's just the stock tune, or the stock tune's reaction to common mods, the engine design or all of those listed.

pm birds, he has some left i'm thinking.

i'll be grabbing another few bottles of his stock when my allowance comes in.

hmm yeah, perhaps for next time, though. keen to get it done tomorrow :P

my mate is insisting magnatec will be all good, but this thread seems to hate it XD.

as such, syn-x not too bad you reckon?

Edited by kaitoukid

Baha magnatec, worst thing I ever did to my skyline. Was going to put it in for 1000km just to give the engine a wash out with a cheaper oil, ended up taking it out after a few hundred because it sounded like ass and hated to rev.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I'm looking for some real world experiences/feed back from anyone who has personally ran a EFR7670 with a 1.05 exhaust housing or a .83 I'm leaning towards the .83 because its a street car used mostly for spirited driving in the canyons roads. I"m not looking for big numbers on paper. I want a responsive powerband that will be very linear to 8000 rpm. I dont mind if power remains somewhat flat but dont want power to drop off on top. The turbo I've purchased is a 1.05, although the mounting flange T3 vs T4 and internal vs external waste gates are different on both housings, I not concern about swapping parts or making fabrication mods to get what I want. Based on some of the research I've done with chat gpt, the 1.05 housing seems to be the way to go with slightly more lag and future proofing for more mods but recommends .83 for best response/street car setup. AI doesn't have the same emotions as real people driving a GTR so I think you guys will be able to give me better feed back 😀   
    • Surely somebody has one in VIC. Have you asked at any shops?  Is this the yearly inspection or did you get a canary?
    • This is where I share pain with you, @Duncan. The move to change so many cooling system pieces to plastic is a killer! Plastic end tanks and a few plastic hose flanges on my car's fail after so little time.  Curious about the need for a bigger rad, is that just for long sessions in the summer or because the car generally needs more cooling?
    • So, that is it! It is a pretty expensive process with the ATF costing 50-100 per 5 litres, and a mechanic will probably charge plenty because they don't want to do it. Still, considering how dirty my fluid was at 120,000klm I think it would be worth doing more like every 80,000 to keep the trans happy, they are very expensive to replace. The job is not that hard if you have the specialist tools so you can save a bit of money and do it yourself!
    • OK, onto filling. So I don't really have any pics, but will describe the process as best I can. The USDM workshop manual also covers it from TM-285 onwards. First, make sure the drain plug (17mm) is snug. Not too tight yet because it is coming off again. Note it does have a copper washer that you could replace or anneal (heat up with a blow torch) to seal nicely. Remove the fill plug, which has an inhex (I think it was 6mm but didn't check). Then, screw in the fill fitting, making sure it has a suitable o-ring (mine came without but I think it is meant to be supplied). It is important that you only screw it in hand tight. I didn't get a good pic of it, but the fill plug leads to a tube about 70mm long inside the transmission. This sets the factory level for fluid in the trans (above the join line for the pan!) and will take about 3l to fill. You then need to connect your fluid pump to the fitting via a hose, and pump in whatever amount of fluid you removed (maybe 3 litres, in my case 7 litres). If you put in more than 3l, it will spill out when you remove the fitting, so do quickly and with a drain pan underneath. Once you have pumped in the required amount of clean ATF, you start the engine and run it for 3 minutes to let the fluid circulate. Don't run it longer and if possible check the fluid temp is under 40oC (Ecutek shows Auto Trans Fluid temp now, or you could use an infrared temp gun on the bottom of the pan). The manual stresses the bit about fluid temperature because it expands when hot an might result in an underfil. So from here, the factory manual says to do the "spill and fill" again, and I did. That is, put an oil pan under the drain plug and undo it with a 17mm spanner, then watch your expensive fluid fall back out again, you should get about 3 litres.  Then, put the drain plug back in, pump 3 litres back in through the fill plug with the fitting and pump, disconnect the fill fitting and replace the fill plug, start the car and run for another 3 minutes (making sure the temp is still under 40oC). The manual then asks for a 3rd "spill and fill" just like above. I also did that and so had put 13l in by now.  This time they want you to keep the engine running and run the transmission through R and D (I hope the wheels are still off the ground!) for a while, and allow the trans temp to get to 40oC, then engine off. Finally, back under the car and undo the fill plug to let the overfill drain out; it will stop running when fluid is at the top of the levelling tube. According to the factory, that is job done! Post that, I reconnected the fill fitting and pumped in an extra 0.5l. AMS says 1.5l overfill is safe, but I started with less to see how it goes, I will add another 1.0 litres later if I'm still not happy with the hot shifts.
×
×
  • Create New...