Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Even @ 330rwkw on E85/.63 - that is pushing then limits of believable. But at least its almost believable rather than outright fudge.

Maybe low 20's its believable (330rwkw that is). A 3582 .82 wouldn't make that much "claimed power" at those boost levels on E85.

you know trent from status uses the same dyno... with the same calibrations, and has had similar results on customers cars with a similar turbo set up?

everyones quick to jump on the dyno debate. If we had a drag strip in SA i would seriously consider it... with previous tune of 360 rwkw's i managed a 1:18 flay around mallala in a drift car on street tyres. this was beating 330 rwkw gtr's that were done on a mainline dyno (willall) so clearly some of you need to pull your heads out of your arseholes and face reality that such results possible.

ever think that maybe mainlines read low? I had an RB20 r32 ages ago with a 25 turbo on it with an EEPROM chip remapped. made 148 rwkw on a mainline.. where as on a roller dyno (DD) it made 180 rwkw.. and on the AMM hub dyno made 185 rwkw with the same correction metiod.

19psi though mate...

5557 .63 made that same power (roughly) on >30psi of boost. Albeit on a 2L SR engine, it's still something. Why do SO MANY people make around the 300rwkw mark on 1psi less? Surely there isn't 90kw difference in reading between the dynos....

Just know that it's all about how much you enjoy the car, and how well it performs - a dyno is simply a number, and doesn't mean ANYTHING in some cases. This is one of those cases...

the whole point is that a 3076 cant push enough air to make 400rwkw.

and its very misleading to forum users that think they can go out and get a 3076 and make 400rwkw its just not goint to happen. its a 300rwkw turbo with E85 you can get 340-350rwkw out of them thats about it.

the whole point is that a 3076 cant push enough air to make 400rwkw.

and its very misleading to forum users that think they can go out and get a 3076 and make 400rwkw its just not goint to happen. its a 300rwkw turbo with E85 you can get 340-350rwkw out of them thats about it.

yes your correct becuase thats exactly what it did.....

the car in question was initially tuned on this dyno by amm using those exact corrections so i gave simon that graph today purely as a direct comparison to how it was before. the result be a 40odd kw increase over the previous setup. i had no real choice there.

i did todays whole retune using more "roller correct" corrections and in actual fact it produced 357kw. i dont think that turbo is gonna do too much more and i had no interest in trying. the result was great as it was.

at the end of the day, its a tuning aid and a VERY good one! the 397 was merely a reperesentation of todays gain.

I don't know what dyno it was on, but I remember recently someone pushing around the 400rwkw mark from a 3076 of some kind, but on a ridiculous boost level around 30psi - WELL out of efficiency

i bet they'd find that if they dropped the boost and tuned it accordingly, the loss would not be dramatic.:thumbsup:

I must have the wrong thread here I thought it was the 400rwkw thread, not the 390rwkw thread. Can anyone link me please? :whistling:

Lol, so true.

Im pretty sure the dyno blew up when he recorded a power level of over 9000

Edited by Nee-san

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • The fab work can be as simple as a couple of silicon hoses and clamps to the factory piping. 
    • Just sounds like either way you need to do some fab work to get everything to fit, so why limit yourself at that point? If the GCG high flow option is zero effort in and out swap though I'd probably do that. It's almost certainly lowest risk, lowest cost, etc. The HKS GTIII-RS option that Kapr mentioned is laughably expensive for what it is, they charge the exact same for two turbos on the RB26 so their margins are off the charts on that thing.
    • Intake manifold is not a part of the issue. The turbo bolts to the exhaust manifold. That is easy. But close your eyes and picture the physical situation. That is a T3 flange on the manifold and a T3 flange on the turbo. As long as any new turbo has a T3 flange on the exhaust housing, that exhaust housing will bolt to the exhaust manifold. This places the exhaust housing in the same place as the stock one. But now move your mental attention a little further forward. The location of the compressor housing is set by the length of the turbo's core. The stock turbo had a long core. Let's say that it is..... 100mm long. So that would place the compressor housing 100mm forward of the exhaust housing. But a highflow, might well have a centre core that is shorter. Let's say that it is only 70mm long. Now the compressor housing will be 30mm further back in the engine bay than the stock one. This DOES move the turbo's compressor outlet backwards. It also moves the compressor's inlet backwards. You will very likely have to do some work to both the inlet and outlet piping to make everything connect again. I am not say this to make it out to be a bigger deal than it is. I am just pointing out that "bolt on" is sometimes not quite bolt on. The highflow from GCG that Murray linked above (https://gcg.com.au/turbo-charger-upgrade-skyline-gtst-2iu-xtrgts-s1.html ) uses a core that is the same length as the stock core, and so does not require this extra work. It will look very much like the stock turbo. No-one uses GTR turbos of any flavour (stock, or aftermarket) in a single turbo application on RB20/25. It's not a thing. Yes, people have been putting on GT3076, GTX3076 (and bigger and smaller versions of those) and G30s (of various sizes) onto RB20/25 since forever. But these are not "bolt on". Everything except the 4 bolts to the exhaust manifold change with these. And genuine Garretts are expensive. Non-gen, like Pulsar, etc, are cheaper, variously as good or nearly as good. But still not bolt on. No-one in the right mind would pay for an HKS turbo. Not in this modern day and age. Well, yes, the GCG highflow. You could ask HG what he can do to make the compressor housing sit in the original location. There are surely others doing highflows around the world. And some of the eBay/Temu ones (as reported by Dose) work and don't die. Bit of a lottery though. I would send your turbo to GCG (here in Oz) to be highflowed if you want a trivial no-extra-work option. But seriously, the work required to change inlet and outlet piping is not that hard. That's a boost control problem, not a turbo problem.
    • Thank you all for the replys 🙂 I know that intake would be different but that is one pipe at it is not that hard to get(custom one). I meant mainly bolt to the stock manifold and the turbo elbow. I looked and many sites/forums but they are just "old" with some old HKS turbos from GT-R i guess? What about some Garrets?  Or any other turbo? Is there even a turbo which i can just bolt on? 😄 And yeah i know about that new HKS but that is like 2000k USD without taxes/shipping in here   Iam getting a touch up tune but my "problem" is that on the "not" hot day iam getting peaks around 0,9 bar...and when it was around 15 Celsious i saw peak around 1 bar which is just too much for stock turbo. And of course turbo is old and i like to get some new one for a piece of mind 🙂 
    • I'm working on the assumption that our friend Jasmine here is a Russian (or, possibly Ukrainian) spammer/spambot, based purely on the number of such that I have been having to neuter in the last few weeks. IP address for the OP above was in WA. But that could have been via VPN. Posting at quarter to 4 in the morning is a good sign of being from somewhere in Europe. The last Jasmine that I kicked in the cooch was IP addressed in Ukraine. Even that could have been via VPN, and the bitchbot could have been from Russia, Serbia, China or anywhere. Regardless, was a spambot, so I killed it with fire. The fact that our new friend Jasmine here did not respond in any way to my tart query strongly suggests to me that this OP was just the establishment phase of a user able to be activated for spamming in a week, or 3 or 10.
×
×
  • Create New...