Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Got my R32 GTR's ecu upgraded to a Vipec recently. With Turbo-back exhaust and R34 turbos and HKS EVC boost controller set to 14 psi, it's making 205 atw kw. I would eventually like it to make around the 250 atw kw.

My question is what's the most cost effective upgrade to do next?

My mechanic suggested to upgrade the fuel system and a re-tune after that. Other are saying cams and more boost.

Any suggetions?

get a new mechanic.

Fuel system is good for over 250rwkw. Maybe change your fuel pump to a newer one

Cams are not needed for a while yet....

Just up the boost and get it re-tuned. Check for any restrictions too. (exhaust etc)

being a tax payer how about using the money to lobby the govt to spend our money on infrastructure so the nation has an asset rather than a larger current account deficit OR more tuning?

That worked....................lol

an hour of dyno time? or a few hours?

8 deg retard on exhaust and 4 deg advance on inlet generally works best on stock cams.

these figures are crank degrees so 4 and 2 on the cam wheels.

id buy a Techedge wideband and have it hooked up to the Vi-PEC. With the autotune function enabled it will constantly analyze and alter the tune for optimum results. Or if you want a dash style interface similar to a power fc handcontroller for the Vi-PEC a EM PRO II engine monitor would be a wise investment.

Edited by DiRTgarage
8 deg retard on exhaust and 4 deg advance on inlet generally works best on stock cams.

these figures are crank degrees so 4 and 2 on the cam wheels.

id buy a Techedge wideband and have it hooked up to the Vi-PEC. With the autotune function enabled it will constantly analyze and alter the tune for optimum results. Or if you want a dash style interface similar to a power fc handcontroller for the Vi-PEC a EM PRO II engine monitor would be a wise investment.

leave it to the wideband O2 control. the autotune doesn't alter the fuel map properly when the cells are changing as rapidly as they do driving around town. (i have tried it and it messes the map up)

leave it to the wideband O2 control. the autotune doesn't alter the fuel map properly when the cells are changing as rapidly as they do driving around town. (i have tried it and it messes the map up)

ok sweet. good investment though...i love mine :D

As far as i am aware it is, god i hope so, i allready have plans for the money haha :D

yep definetly is. money will start being deposited in april unless you didnt do your tax return last year or the year before (cant remember which year they are going off). will be getting deposited straight into the account that you used aswell.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Have a look at that (shitty) pic I posted. You can see AN -4 braided line coming to a -4 to 1/8 BSPT adapter, into a 1/8 BSPT T piece. The Haltech pressure sender is screwed into the long arm of the sender and factory sender (pre your pic) into the T side. You can also see the cable tie holding the whole contraption in place. Is it better than mounting the sender direct to your engine fitting......yes because it removes that vibration as the engine revs out 50 times every lap and that factory sender is pretty big. Is it necessary for you......well I've got no idea, I just don't like something important failing twice so over-engineer it to the moon!
    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
×
×
  • Create New...