Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

any update stao on that rb25det gettin tuned? the one only running 9psi for now

He drove off to Adelaide, probably come back in 2 weeks to finish off the tune. I will postup result once its done.

Ok. This is our latest dyno result based on a ATR28G4 in a .64 T28 rear housing running on a build CA18det running 98 fuel. Car made 316rwkws at 24psi at this stage ( Note: see how the power curve is still rising. ). going to do a final tune in few days. This turbo would be making some mad power on RB engines using .63 rear housing.

atr28g4316rwkws2.jpg ________ atr28g4316rwkwstorques2.jpg

ATR28G4 would be some thing similar to a GT3076.

Its my daily car. I drive drive it around to deliver turbos. lol

CA's modifications: Forgied pistons, Split fire coils, Nistune ECU, FMIC, 700CC injectors, Z32 AFM, 256dur/8.9mm cams, Tomei adjustable cam gears, ebay manifold and 3inch exhaust. Every thing else not mentioned are stock.

That looks good. OP6 is still small. You need .63 rear. I can get one machined for for $250. But you need to make a new front pipe. Check That exahust place next to Trents.

  • 1 month later...

The guy got EPAed and defected on the way back from SA. its going to be a while before it go back to the dyno. Hoo and by the way there are plenty of ATR43's progress. The laser cutters finally got our flanges ready. So just matter of putting them together now. should have 2x samples done by weekend.

Its similar sort of CHRA. Rear housing is different. It will be a.63 Rear housing. that we made our selves. I'm plaining to make 4 different types of CHRA with 2x different sized A/R housings. which are powered from any thing at 230rwkws to 330rwkws depends on driving ability. I will post some photos once I get the housings finished.

no one does, i drive to Hoppers. Car runs 100% time on E85. Jerry cans ftw! :(

Hopefully some one starts selling it soon, im not as dedicated as you are :)

Whats the price of it now?

Edited by W0rp3D

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Welcome to Skyline ownership. Yes, it is entirely possible parts websites get things wrong. There's a whole world of inaccuracies out there when it comes to R34 stuff (and probably 33 and 32). Lots of things that are 'just bolt on, entirely interchangable' aren't. Even between S1 and S2 R34's. Yes they have a GTT item supposedly being 296mm. This is incorrect. I would call whoever you got them from and return them and let them know the GTT actually uses 310mm rotors. Depending on where you got them from your experience and success will obviously vary.
    • Hi...a bit a "development" on the brakes. I spoke to the guys where i get brakes from...and they are saying that 296mm EBC are for R34 GT-T. I then went to their site: https://www.ebcbrakes.com/vehicle/uk-row/NISSAN/Skyline (R34)/ and search for my car(R34 GT 1998 - it has GTT brakes) and it show me this USR1229 number and they are rly 296mm rotors... So now iam rly confused... The rotors i have now on the car are 310mm asi shown... So where is the problem? Does the whole EBC got it wrong or my calipers are just...idk know what?  
    • Oh What the hell, I used to get a "are you sure you want to reply, this thread is XX months old" message. Maybe a software update remove that. My bad.
    • This is a recipe for disaster* Note: Disaster is relative. The thing that often gets lost in threads like this is what is considered acceptable poke and compromise between what one person considers 'good' looks and what someone else does. The quoted specs would sit absurdly outside the guards with the spacers mentioned and need  REALLY thin tyres and a LOT of camber AND rolling the guards to fit. Some people love this. Some people consider this a ruined car. One thing is for certain though, rolling the guards is pretty much mandatory for any 'good' fitment (of either variety). It is often the difference between any fitment remotely close to the guards. "Not to mention the rears were like a mm from hitting the coilovers." I have a question though - This spec is VERY close to what I was planning to buy relative to the inboard suspension - I have an offset measuring tool on the way to confirm it. When you say "like a mm" do you mean literally 1mm? Or 2mm? Cause that's enough clearance for me in the rear :p I actually found the more limiting factor ISNT the coilover but the actual suspension arms. Did you take a look at how close those were?
    • @GTSBoy yeah sorry i know thery are known for colors bud those DBA are too in colors 🙂 Green will be good enough for me  
×
×
  • Create New...