Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I'm not even going to bother responding because this kid clearly doesn't listen, I'm sure Stao doesn't want his thread cluttered up with anymore of this bullshit either.

All I said was that if there is an underlying issue with the Z32 ECU here (which appears to be the case) then my expectation is that it's Nistunes responsilbility to resolve it.... which they appear to be doing. Clearly I am not happy with this situation and other people telling me to just buy another ECU is not the answer I'm looking for here.

Is there something you are missing?

8bit are supported... 16bit are not... Its advertised as such and Nistune even offer a service to identify the ECU for you.

If you have an 8bit, then I dont see what the problem is? If you have a 16bit then I dont see how your lack of care when purchasing the product is a liability of the vendor. You have not read what was available from the vendor and the vendor has no responsibility to coming up with a solution to it.

Simple as that really.

Is there something you are missing?

8bit are supported... 16bit are not... Its advertised as such and Nistune even offer a service to identify the ECU for you.

If you have an 8bit, then I dont see what the problem is? If you have a 16bit then I dont see how your lack of care when purchasing the product is a liability of the vendor. You have not read what was available from the vendor and the vendor has no responsibility to coming up with a solution to it.

Simple as that really.

I have the same problem with another company. I purchased a Blu-ray and have now been told my stupid DVD player wont play it... I can't believe the company has screwed me out of all this money for a DVD player when it won't play Blu-rays

Edited by SimonR32

Actually Stao it was precisely because of Trent talking up this Nistune Z32 ECU solution for the R33 that I purchased one in the first place! (through him)

I will wait to see what Darkhalf comes back with...

Contrary to what Trent says this is a 100% a Nistune problem - except of course when you are using an unapproved 16bit ECU!

Nistune sell this solution for the R33 so they are obliged to sort these issues out and get it working.

My Z32 ECU is on the Nistune approved list and was modded by them in SA - I damn well expect them to get it working! :mad:

P.S. I just spent a bazillion dollars on turbo, injectors, clutch etc and didn't leave myself budget to buy a $1000 ECU

@Rolls - Thanks for the advice mate but I got this Z32 ECU because Trent and everyone else were adamant that it is a better solution than the R32 ECU.

im sorry but its NOTHING TO DO WITH NISTUNE... FFS. It is neither my fault or NISTUNE'S that you decided to take the cheapest route, buy a PFC or any other myriad of R33 designated products and you will be sweet....

You have an ecu designed for another car with only 3/4 of the correct inputs going into the ecu the others are being turned off in the Nistune software ..... if it wasnt for the nistune it would not work AT ALL it just happens that in some cases it works real well and other's are a pain.

If it was an issue with an R34 nistune in a R34 vehicle or similar then yes it would be their fault but in this case all onus is on the converter or the owner as it is a custom install....

PS dont put works in my mouth i fkn hate it... i am never adamant about anything other than doing things properly... i may have suggest it as an option but never adamant.

Regardless of your reservations i hope your car ends up being fine and whoever tunes it finds it to be one of the good ones.

im sorry but its NOTHING TO DO WITH NISTUNE... FFS. It is neither my fault or NISTUNE'S that you decided to take the cheapest route, buy a PFC or any other myriad of R33 designated products and you will be sweet....

You have an ecu designed for another car with only 3/4 of the correct inputs going into the ecu the others are being turned off in the Nistune software ..... if it wasnt for the nistune it would not work AT ALL it just happens that in some cases it works real well and other's are a pain.

If it was an issue with an R34 nistune in a R34 vehicle or similar then yes it would be their fault but in this case all onus is on the converter or the owner as it is a custom install....

PS dont put works in my mouth i fkn hate it... i am never adamant about anything other than doing things properly... i may have suggest it as an option but never adamant.

Regardless of your reservations i hope your car ends up being fine and whoever tunes it finds it to be one of the good ones.

:yes::worship:

im sorry but its NOTHING TO DO WITH NISTUNE... FFS. It is neither my fault or NISTUNE'S that you decided to take the cheapest route, buy a PFC or any other myriad of R33 designated products and you will be sweet....

Mate, I for one can vouch for you. I remember asking you the question once before re Z32 Nistune or patchwire R34 Nistune to a 33.

Its publicly available on this forum, I remember you confirmed the R34 was the better option and to proceed with caution against the Z32.

No doubt you have done the same here, normally people will give their desired answer when asking a question so I cannot blame you for saying 'you can' and its just fools who hear 'you should'.

Back on topic, lets see some SS-1 PU updates!

Sorry guys I seem to have pissed people off royally here which was not my intention at all.

I don't think I put words in anyones mouth and clearly I have my wires crossed somewhere along the line... :blush:

Appologies Trent I meant no disrespect

Stao please have your thread back

im sorry but its NOTHING TO DO WITH NISTUNE... FFS. It is neither my fault or NISTUNE'S that you decided to take the cheapest route, buy a PFC or any other myriad of R33 designated products and you will be sweet....

You have an ecu designed for another car with only 3/4 of the correct inputs going into the ecu the others are being turned off in the Nistune software ..... if it wasnt for the nistune it would not work AT ALL it just happens that in some cases it works real well and other's are a pain.

If it was an issue with an R34 nistune in a R34 vehicle or similar then yes it would be their fault but in this case all onus is on the converter or the owner as it is a custom install....

PS dont put works in my mouth i fkn hate it... i am never adamant about anything other than doing things properly... i may have suggest it as an option but never adamant.

Regardless of your reservations i hope your car ends up being fine and whoever tunes it finds it to be one of the good ones.

In other news...

I'm anxiously awaiting my SS1-PU-Prototype and other bits to arrive from Stao.

Chasing 280rwkw hi boost.

Might even choose e85 for fuel and kick it up to 300+rwkw. Maybe. WTB more availability?

In other news...

I'm anxiously awaiting my SS1-PU-Prototype and other bits to arrive from Stao.

Chasing 280rwkw hi boost.

Might even choose e85 for fuel and kick it up to 300+rwkw. Maybe. WTB more availability?

Well the the SS1.5PU just rolled off the dyno... fun times :) will let stao post his results.

In other news...

I'm anxiously awaiting my SS1-PU-Prototype and other bits to arrive from Stao.

Chasing 280rwkw hi boost.

Might even choose e85 for fuel and kick it up to 300+rwkw. Maybe. WTB more availability?

Sorry I've decided to build you a brand new turbine housing using bigger wastegate assembly and gate controller. You should have the pack tomorrow or Monday.

Also I've purchased adaptronic plug in and piggy pack ecus for testing, I will give a discount on the ECU for all of our customers whom is or have purchased our turbocharger or high flow services, if they works well on my test cars. So R33 GTST owners now can have a good and reliable ECU option for under $1000.

Any way this is the ATR43SS-1.5 model. I didn't install a wastegate controller on the testing unit so I ended up with a boost drop, that also lead to drop in power and torque. The controller will be integrated for one more run.

9 sec ramp

power.jpg

boost.jpg

Here's the fun part. This turbo is made to have similar top end as the original SS-1 but with more torque. The SS-1's torque feels quite smooth and linear, while this one gives this explosion of torque as soon as the paddle is stepped in. It sky rockets 510Mn of torque by 3900RPMs, put that on road it skits in 3rd gear acceleration. Seriously need to control the car with my right foot, but this is very fun to drive.

Above behavior is also found in the SS1PU, except the PU version is 2x times magnified (that turbo is crazy to drive on road).

too much chat about ecu's

any news on highflow developments?

what would you suggest so that i could run the max that stock afm and injectors could handle on an rb25neo?

They are coming along fine. I'm still making up the final decisions of the wheel parameters. I want to machine a tinny 60mm comp wheel that can blow out the equivalent of a 71mm cast wheel. That would be crazy to drive with the SS-1's turbine combination. Should get very noticeable difference even on factory setup.

Unmarked sketches of the new wheel design.

wheel.JPG

The SS1.5 and SS1PU is now commercially available. We will need 1 extra working days to machine any of the billet wheeled turbos. Price of the SS2 and SS1PU listed is based on a building of a single unit from a block of steel, Their prices fluctuates depending on the No. of orders we get, so PM for their prices if interested as you might be able to get a 10~15% discount.

Sorry I've decided to build you a brand new turbine housing using bigger wastegate assembly and gate controller. You should have the pack tomorrow or Monday.

<3

Can't wait. I'll be sure to post my dyno results!

too much chat about ecu's

any news on highflow developments?

what would you suggest so that i could run the max that stock afm and injectors could handle on an rb25neo?

Read through the last few pages, Tao has just finished a turbo exactly for this purpose! The other option is the SS1, a tad larger so you would only need ~15psi and it will be nicer on temps. But the other 2530 comparitive turbo will have better response but the boost drops off quite a bit. It depends on your preference.

Have some very positive E85 results with the SS1!! Very happy, super responsive and 279rwkw up top!!

Cant wait to see some SS2 + E85 results too.

Thanks Trent from Status Tuning and Tao from Hypergear turbos!

post-29432-0-89432700-1313121673_thumb.jpg

post-29432-0-22798900-1313121681_thumb.jpg

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Wheel alignment immediately. Not "when I get around to it". And further to what Duncan said - you cannot just put camber arms on and shorten them. You will introduce bump steer far in excess of what the car had with stock arms. You need adjustable tension arms and they need to be shortened also. The simplest approach is to shorten them the same % as the stock ones. This will not be correct or optimal, but it will be better than any other guess. The correct way to set the lengths of both arms is to use a properly built/set up bump steer gauge and trial and error the adjustments until you hit the camber you need and want and have minimum bump steer in the range of motion that the wheel is expected to travel. And what Duncan said about toe is also very true. And you cannot change the camber arm without also affecting toe. So when you have adjustable arms on the back of a Skyline, the car either needs to go to a talented wheel aligner (not your local tyre shop dropout), or you need to be able to do this stuff yourself at home. Guess which approach I have taken? I have built my own gear for camber, toe and bump steer measurement and I do all this on the flattest bit of concrete I have, with some shims under the tyres on one side to level the car.
    • Thought I would get some advice from others on this situation.    Relevant info: R33 GTS25t Link G4x ECU Walbro 255LPH w/ OEM FP Relay (No relay mod) Scenario: I accidentally messed up my old AVS S5 (rev.1) at the start of the year and the cars been immobilised. Also the siren BBU has completely failed; so I decided to upgrade it.  I got a newer AVS S5 (rev.2?) installed on Friday. The guy removed the old one and its immobilisers. Tried to start it; the car cranks but doesnt start.  The new one was installed and all the alarm functions seem to be working as they should; still wouldn't start Went to bed; got up on Friday morning and decided to have a look into the no start problem. Found the car completely dead.  Charged the battery; plugged it back in and found the brake lights were stuck on.  Unplugging the brake pedal switch the lights turn off. Plug it back in and theyre stuck on again. I tested the switch (continuity test and resistance); all looks good (0-1kohm).  On talking to AVS; found its because of the rubber stopper on the brake pedal; sure enough the middle of it is missing so have ordered a new one. One of those wear items; which was confusing what was going on However when I try unplugging the STOP Light fuses (under the dash and under the hood) the brake light still stays on. Should those fuses not cut the brake light circuit?  I then checked the ECU; FP Speed Error.  Testing the pump again; I can hear the relay clicking every time I switch it to ON. I unplugged the pump and put the multimeter across the plug. No continuity; im seeing 0.6V (ECU signal?) and when it switches the relay I think its like 20mA or 200mA). Not seeing 12.4V / 7-9A. As far as I know; the Fuel Pump was wired through one of the immobiliser relays on the old alarm.  He pulled some thick gauged harness out with the old alarm wiring; which looks to me like it was to bridge connections into the immobilisers? Before it got immobilised it was running just fine.  Im at a loss to why the FP is getting no voltage; I thought maybe the FP was faulty (even though I havent even done 50km on the new pump) but no voltage at the harness plug.  Questions: Could it be he didnt reconnect the fuel pump when testing it after the old alarm removal (before installing the new alarm)?  Is this a case of bridging to the brake lights instead of the fuel pump circuit? It's a bit beyond me as I dont do a lot with electrical; so have tried my best to diagnose what I think seems to make sense.  Seeking advice if theres for sure an issue with the alarm install to get him back here; or if I do infact, need an auto electrician to diagnose it. 
    • Then, shorten them by 1cm, drop the car back down and have a visual look (or even better, use a spirit level across the wheel to see if you have less camber than before. You still want something like 1.5 for road use. Alternatively, if you have adjustable rear ride height (I assume you do if you have extreme camber wear), raise the suspension back to standard height until you can get it all aligned properly. Finally, keep in mind that wear on the inside of the tyre can be for incorrect toe, not just camber
    • I know I have to get a wheel alignment but until then I just need to bring the rear tyres in a bit they're wearing to the belt on the inside and brand new on the outside edge. I did shorten the arms a bit but got it wrong now after a few klms the Slip and VDC lights come on. I'd just like to get it to a point where I can drive for another week or two before getting an alignment. I've had to pay a lot of other stuff recently so doing it myself is my only option 
    • You just need a wheel alignment after, so just set them to the same as current and drive to the shop. As there are 2 upper links it may also be worth adding adjustable upper front links at the same time; these reduce bump steer when you move the camber (note that setting those correctly takes a lot longer as you have to recheck the camber at each length of the toe arm, through a range of movement, so you could just ignore that unless the handling becomes unpredictable)
×
×
  • Create New...