Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

haha dammit, hoping nobody checked the new SAU jumpers out, theyre pretty comfy but the models need work lol

for everybody scratching there heads check out the NSW section and look at the NEW Merchandise

Sarge's car made 244kw at ADVAN performance on 11psi, then 1st run on our dyno it barely made over 200 from memory, after we had tuned it it made 244kw on 19psi, there is something holding this car back, according to Tao the intake pipe on this car is a 60kw restriction, Sarge is in the process of making a new intake pipe but has run into major issue's since doing so, looks like his car will need a full retune due to the different position of the AFM.

Harey what makes you say the dyno i use is a happy dyno? that is actually quite funny cause if it was a happy dyno than everycar i have tuned would be making unrealistic numbers which they don't. even funnier that before we started tuning Dave's car there was a comment made about atleast 1 person on SAU saying i bet its a happy dyno.

So back on topic, Tao how's things going

I never said you had a happy dyno?? All I was saying is if you are using a different ramp rate then the full boost @ X rpm will be different. In this very thread Stao did back to back tests and proved this.

Using the same dyno and tuner as Stao uses, I have never seen a HKS2835 Pro S hit full boost before 3500rpm using a 9 second ramp rate. Just trying to compare apples with apples.

Come one Sarge fix ya issues :P

BTW these discussions are more on topic then SAU jumpers or zombies :whistling:

I would rather a longer ramp rate to better match the car being on the road.

Eg from 1500rpm to 7500rpm in 4th is going to take longer than 9secs when you are on the road

I would rather a longer ramp rate to better match the car being on the road.

Eg from 1500rpm to 7500rpm in 4th is going to take longer than 9secs when you are on the road

Is pulling from 1500rpm really indicative of on road performance? The only time I pull from 1500rpm is when I'm going to shift at 3000rpm. If I want the car to get up, I'll give it a gear or two and be pulling from 4k or more.

I'm not particularly concerned about performance off boost or below about 4000rpm (as long as it's not dire).

It it absolutely indicative on on road performance in my book...you dont drive every where like its a race track, so being able to pull cleanly away from low revs and big throttle is important.

And to me is a key difference between a good tune and a crap tune...even if they both make the same peak power

It it absolutely indicative on on road performance in my book...you dont drive every where like its a race track, so being able to pull cleanly away from low revs and big throttle is important.

And to me is a key difference between a good tune and a crap tune...even if they both make the same peak power

Its also the key difference between a decent and crap turbo...

Its also the key difference between a decent and crap turbo...

Well that just says a lot about the performance of my ss-1 then doesn't it. :(

Edited by lilcrash

It it absolutely indicative on on road performance in my book...you dont drive every where like its a race track, so being able to pull cleanly away from low revs and big throttle is important.

And to me is a key difference between a good tune and a crap tune...even if they both make the same peak power

A tune of arse aside (which is obvious so a 9 or 12 second pull is irrelevant), not driving like you're on a track supports my belief. If you're driving around "normally", assuming the car isn't running a T88 or the tune isn't borked to hell, it's not really important what it's like pulling from 1500rpm. How many times do you have WOT at 1500rpm? if it's often, then you're doing it wrong.

If I am WOT, then it's pretty unlikely that I'm going to wait around for 2000rpm for my turbo to come on the boil. I'm going to give it a gear or two and get it into lots of boost and then go WOT.

I never said you had a happy dyno?? All I was saying is if you are using a different ramp rate then the full boost @ X rpm will be different. In this very thread Stao did back to back tests and proved this.

Using the same dyno and tuner as Stao uses, I have never seen a HKS2835 Pro S hit full boost before 3500rpm using a 9 second ramp rate. Just trying to compare apples with apples.

Come one Sarge fix ya issues :P

Ok then if the part about the happy dyno wasn't aimed at me then its all good.

In relation to ramp rates, i used the same ramp rates on dave's car as i did dynafits ss1.5 and sarge's ss2 so tht would have to be the best comparison seeing as its the same dyno. And its not in victoria or wa lol :P

So if we can dig up sarge's and dynafit's sheets we can hv a looksy. Once sarge has his car up and running again i will do a full tune on it.

Harey i know ur not a believer but come for a drive and get dave to take u for a run. His car really does do exactly what he says.

A tune of arse aside (which is obvious so a 9 or 12 second pull is irrelevant), not driving like you're on a track supports my belief. If you're driving around "normally", assuming the car isn't running a T88 or the tune isn't borked to hell, it's not really important what it's like pulling from 1500rpm. How many times do you have WOT at 1500rpm? if it's often, then you're doing it wrong.

If I am WOT, then it's pretty unlikely that I'm going to wait around for 2000rpm for my turbo to come on the boil. I'm going to give it a gear or two and get it into lots of boost and then go WOT.

Yes yes :)

but sometimes you dont have time to go back a couple of pegs...eg merging.

There are huge torque gains to be had by spending an hour or so on the off boost low rev area of them map.

I.e when I get the JZ tuned with the t78...I'll need to spend ages on the off boost part to make as much torque as possible for the around town drive.

Not sure how relevant this is but Trent gave me a simple way of thinking about the ramp rates, 9 second ramp rate is similar to having 1-2 people in the car, 12+ second ramp rate is like having 3-4 people.

Zeb the only thing u need to be aware of is advancing the timing in off boost area can make the boost laggier. Sometimes u need to use less timing to get the turbo spooling which promotes power, even a few psi is going to help.

Ok then if the part about the happy dyno wasn't aimed at me then its all good.

In relation to ramp rates, i used the same ramp rates on dave's car as i did dynafits ss1.5 and sarge's ss2 so tht would have to be the best comparison seeing as its the same dyno. And its not in victoria or wa lol :P

So if we can dig up sarge's and dynafit's sheets we can hv a looksy. Once sarge has his car up and running again i will do a full tune on it.

Harey i know ur not a believer but come for a drive and get dave to take u for a run. His car really does do exactly what he says.

Any chance of posting up some dyno sheets directly comparing the 3 turbos on the same screen?

I am sure Dave's car is a beast! My point was that there are other turbos that can do similar. Is Dave's car with the sexy shiny engine bay? Thats another thing that car has aftermarket plenum etc etc, not a true comparison to bolting a turbo on with a new exhaust, afm and injectors. The 2 Hypergear turbos you have tuned dont necessarily show what they are capable of either. Thats all I am saying is I would love to see a direct comparison.

Yes I am bitter that I cant afford a setup like Dave's :worship:

Not sure how relevant this is but Trent gave me a simple way of thinking about the ramp rates, 9 second ramp rate is similar to having 1-2 people in the car, 12+ second ramp rate is like having 3-4 people.

Isn't it more like driving in 1st gear, or say 4th gear? Or say driving up a really steep hill?

Any chance of posting up some dyno sheets directly comparing the 3 turbos on the same screen?

I am sure Dave's car is a beast! My point was that there are other turbos that can do similar. Is Dave's car with the sexy shiny engine bay? Thats another thing that car has aftermarket plenum etc etc, not a true comparison to bolting a turbo on with a new exhaust, afm and injectors. The 2 Hypergear turbos you have tuned dont necessarily show what they are capable of either. Thats all I am saying is I would love to see a direct comparison.

Yes I am bitter that I cant afford a setup like Dave's :worship:

Yeah thats the one :blush: Just dont tell the wifey how much i have spent!!!

Thread with dyno sheet can be foundhere

We are going to tidy it up a bit in the next few weeks, time got away from us on the friday sorting out some other issues

Zeb the only thing u need to be aware of is advancing the timing in off boost area can make the boost laggier. Sometimes u need to use less timing to get the turbo spooling which promotes power, even a few psi is going to help.

Yeah, Its a bit of a catch 22 lol

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Well, after the full circus this week (new gearbag, 14 psi actuator on, injectors and AFM upgraded, and.....turbo repair) the diagnosis on the wastegate is in. It was broken. It was broken in a really strange way. The weld that holds the lever arm onto the wastegate flapper shaft broke. Broke completely, but broke in such a way that it could go back together in the "correct" position, or it could rearrange itself somewhere else along the fracture plane and sit with the flapper not parallel to the lever. So, who knows how and when exactly what happened? No-one will ever know. Was it broken like this the first time it spat the circlip and wedged itself deep into the dump? Or was it only broken when I tried to pry it back into place? (I didn't try that hard, but who knows?). Or did it break first? Or did it break between the first and second event of wierdness? Meh. It doesn't matter now. It is welded back together. And it is now held closed by a 14 psi actuator, so...the car has been tuned with the supporting mods (and the order of operations there is that the supporting mods and dyno needed to be able to be done first before adding boost, because it was pinging on <<14 psi with the new turbo with only a 6 psi actuator). And then tuned up a bit, and with the boost controller turned off throughout that process. So it was only running WG pressure and so only hit about 15-16 psi. The turbo is still ever so slightly lazier than might be preferred - like it is still a bit on the big side for the engine. I haven't tested it on the road properly in any way - just driven it around in traffic for a half hour or so. But it is like chalk and cheese compared to what it was. Between dyno numbers and driving feedback: It makes 100 kW at 3k rpm, which is OK, could be better. That's stock 2JZ territory, or RB20 with G series 550. It actually starts building boost from 2k, which is certainly better than it did recently (with all the WG flapper bullshit). Although it's hard to remember what it was like prior to all that - it certainly seems much, much better. And that makes sense, given the WG was probably starting to blow open at anything above about 3 psi anyway (with the 6 psi actuator). It doesn't really get to "full boost" (say 16 psi) until >>4k rpm. I am hopeful that this is a feature of the lack of boost controller keeping boost pressure off the actuator, because it was turned off for the dyno and off for the drives afterward. There's more to be found here, I'm sure. It made 230 rwkW at not a lot more than 6k and held it to over 7k, so there seems to be plenty of potential to get it up to 250-260rwkW with 18 psi or so, which would be a decent effort, considering the stock sized turbo inlet pipework and AFM, and the return flow cooler. According to Tao, those things should definitely put a bit of a limit on it by that sort of number. I must stress that I have not opened the throttle 100% on the road yet - well, at least not 100% and allowed it to wind all the way up. It'll have to wait until some reasonable opportunity. I'm quite looking forward to that - it feels massively better than it has in a loooong time. It's back to its old self, plus about 20% extra powers over the best it ever did before. I'm going to get the boost controller set up to maximise spool and settle at no more than ~17 psi (for now) and then go back on the dyno to see what we can squeeze out of it. There is other interesting news too. I put together a replacement tube to fit the R35 AFM in the stock location. This is the first time the tuner has worked with one, because anyone else he has tuned for has gone from Z32 territory to aftermarket ECU. No-one has ever wanted to stay Nistuned and do what I've done. Anyway, his feedback is that the R35 AFM is super super super responsive. Tiny little changes in throttle position or load turn up immediately as a cell change on the maps. Way, way more responsive than any of the old skool AFMs. Makes it quite diffifult to tune as you have to stay right on top of that so you don't wander off the cell you wanted to tune. But it certainly seems to help with real world throttle response. That's hard to separate from all the other things that changed, but the "pedal feel" is certainly crisp.
    • I'm a bit confused by this post, so I'll address the bit I understand lol.  Use an air compressor and blow away the guide coat sanding residue. All the better if you have a moisture trap for your compressor. You'd want to do this a few times as you sand the area, you wouldn't for example sand the entire area till you think its perfect and then 'confirm' that is it by blowing away the guide coat residue.  Sand the area, blow away the guide coat residue, inspect the panel, back to sanding... rinse and repeat. 
    • The detail level is about right for the money they charge for the full kit... AU$21.00 each issue, 110 issues for a total of $2,300 (I mentioned $2.2K in the first post when the exchange rate was better). $20/week is doable... 😐
    • If planning on joining us for the day(s) please indicate by filling in this form. https://forms.gle/Ma8Nn4DzYVA8uDHg7
    • You put the driver's seat on the wrong side! Incredible detail on all of this. It looks like you could learn a lot about the car just from assembling the kit.
×
×
  • Create New...