Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Stao tried to seach and find the answer because I think you have told me before.

But what do you think the limit of the SS1PU would be on water meth injection.

Mine was limited due to the heat.

So in the future once I save the dollars I will be going that route.

But at the same time dont want to find it hits a wall at like 260rwkw

The R33 highflowed turbos would support up to 240rwkws while R34 turbochargers can be high flowed to support 260rwkws. response wise high flowed R33 turbo is about 300RPMs earlier. Personaly I prefer to run a highflowed R34 turbo

Actual water meth (50/50ish mix) will get you results similar to E85 if implemented right.

Yet to see any E85 results on the ss1pu

If you know of any then I would love to see.

Just want to know what to expect if I do it

Prob just me or the photo but v band doesn't look 3.5".

Plus I thought Stao told me once he could only do 3" max.

I thought it was 3.5" cause we were talking about a 3.5" dump. But if its 3" im not worried, makes it easier to get the dump to fit to the turbo anyway

Yet to see any E85 results on the ss1pu

If you know of any then I would love to see.

Just want to know what to expect if I do it

Based on the spec of the thing it will lay close to 300.

I'll give you a good deal on my WMI kit if you want to be the first to try. Not trying to be a viral sales kent.

Based on the spec of the thing it will lay close to 300.

I'll give you a good deal on my WMI kit if you want to be the first to try. Not trying to be a viral sales kent.

Pm me prices and details of the kit

Don't know to much about them but would need one with a good fail safe

Yet to see any E85 results on the ss1pu

If you know of any then I would love to see.

Just want to know what to expect if I do it

I fitted one to an M35 in the stock housings that managed 300, not a good indication of what it would do on an RB but it should be close.

I fitted one to an M35 in the stock housings that managed 300, not a good indication of what it would do on an RB but it should be close.

Good to know Stao has done a nice job with the turbine side of things. I can't wait to have mine running :)

How did it go on the VQ?

I fitted one to an M35 in the stock housings that managed 300, not a good indication of what it would do on an RB but it should be close.

Still means it can flow that sort of power

Spoke to my clutch guy today and his going to get back to me if it can handle that power.

If it can't then I can't afford it

If it can then I will be doing that over Christmas

When in for a return tune today.

After a few runs the manifold pretty much overheated and split one of the silicon hoses so had to call it a wrap again.....

We got up to 283 rwkw before the silicon hose split

Tune as it stands atm:

74702_555188291162201_22398245_n.jpg

I might try out one of staos dual actuators as its at 19.5 psi dropping to about 15.5 psi i think

What turbo is that Tony? Is it stock intake mani?

Cheers

Justin

Hey Justin its an internal gate ss2 turbo on 98octane

I got a one of staos china manifolds

It moved nearly 2 ton down the quarter in 12.9, faster than mine as he gets boost on stall.

I think it hit 20psi by around 3k...

Thats very nice! Theres always a point where you can have a faster car with a lower number, which is something im scared i may have overshot by going the SS1PU on my SR but we will see!

Good to note that the unit is an all round good turbo though. Everyone who has one seems to be happy with it regardless of how much power they made (its only numbers anyway). Props to Stao yet again!

When in for a return tune today.

After a few runs the manifold pretty much overheated and split one of the silicon hoses so had to call it a wrap again.....

We got up to 283 rwkw before the silicon hose split

What fuel Tony? Its starting to shape up nicely (ignore the fuel question coz you replied yourself before I hit send)

The R33 highflowed turbos would support up to 240rwkws while R34 turbochargers can be high flowed to support 260rwkws. response wise high flowed R33 turbo is about 300RPMs earlier. Personaly I prefer to run a highflowed R34 turbo

21U @ 260rwkw on United E85. Only 14PSI as ter rear tyre can't handle more around the track.

This turbo has now done over 40 track days, including WTAC.

Responce..5th gear at 110 is pretty much on boost. Its over 100rwkw at 3000rpm on trents dyno.

Update on car.

Car is finally tuned:

R34GTT

Mods:

SS2 Internally gated Turbo

98 Octane

China manifold

3inch JJR dump & 3inch exhaust

ID 1000 injectors

Yellow jacket coil packs

Hybrid return flow intercooler

Scotty 3inch intake

483595_556895830991447_473150841_n.jpg

About 190rwkw at 4,000 rpm so happy with that!

About 20psi falling over to about 16psi i think

Note this is a conservative track tune

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • LOL.... a good amount of people (not all) on that continent seem to know everything and like to measure things in bananas, football fields, statue of liberties instead of the metric system lol.
    • I assume the modules are similar enough, so if you've had no issues I don't see why I would. I have tried to find a wiring diagram for the FPCM / fuel pump circuit, but I can't find it anywhere. Otherwise, I would just do some wire cutting and joining at the FPCM and give the 12 V supplied to the FPCM directly to the pump instead. If you know anyone that could help with wiring diagrams, I'd be very happy  
    • If it dies, then bypass. The task isn't difficult. I have one running on a standard R32 FPCM. That's after nearly 20 years of it running an 040, which pull substantially more current than the Walbro. They're not the same module, but I'd hope it indicates that the R33 one should be man enough for the job. I think people kill them when putting proper sized pumps on them, not these little toy pumps we're talking about here.
    • Silicone spray won't hurt anything. And if it does, that's an opportunity to put some solid steel spherical bushings in, so you can really learn what suspension noise sounds like, If you're going to try it, just spray one bush at a time, so you can work out which one is actually noisy. My best guess is that if the noise started only since putting the coilovers in, then it is just noise being transmitted up through the top mounts of the struts, and not necessarily "new" noise from bushes. But it's almost impossible to know.
    • Are you saying the 34 is SUV height, and not that we're talking about an SUV here? (because if we're talking about an SUV, you don't fix them. You just replace them when something breaks. Not worth establishing sufficient emotional connection with an SUV to warrant doing any work on one). I wouldn't jack my car up on a short little loop of 10mm steel rod poking out through a hole in the bumper bar, front or rear end. I realise that we're probably not talking about that type of loop at the front, being the one under/behind the bar on a Skyline.... but even for that one, trying to jack up on what amounts to a thin piece of steel, designed purely for withstanding a horizontal tension force, not a vertical compressive force (and so would be prone to buckling/crushing) and, my most particular bitch about it - located RIGHT AT THE EXTREME FRONT OF THE CAR, applying a load up through the radiator support panel, etc, with almost the entire mass of the car cantilevered between there and the rear wheels? Nope. Not doing that. Not on the regular. That structure out there in front of the front crossmember is not designed to carry load in the vertical direction. Not really designed to carry any load at all, really. The chassis rail that the tow point is connected to would be fine loaded in tension, as per towing. Not intended to carry the mass of the whole car, especially loaded all on one rail, with twisting and all sorts of shitty load distribution going on. No, I will happily drive up on some pieces of wood, thanks. That can only happen on driven wheels, and they are at the other end of the car, and this problem does not exist at that end of the car. And even then, I have been known to drive up on at least 1x piece of 2x8 each side at the rear, simply to reduce the amount of jack pumping necessary to get the car up high enough for the jack stands. What really really shits me about Skylines is the lack of decent places for chassis stands at either end of the car. You'd think they'd be designed into the crossmembers.
×
×
  • Create New...