Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Gee by the time I get my car 100% there's gonna be 100 new better turbos available.

Keep up the good work Stao!

If its off the car you can send it back to me for a update. The main difference in the SS2 would be the Type B rear housing and compressor housing.

Just came back from Drags :)

Very very happy

I can confirm its driver error that's causing my low times.

I think i could get a low 13s ( or a better driver )

Got a 13.822 @ 171.3km/h

Around a 4k launch

FYI

ATR45G2.5 is my turbo @ ~340hp

Just came back from Drags :)

Very very happy

I can confirm its driver error that's causing my low times.

I think i could get a low 13s ( or a better driver )

Got a 13.822 @ 171.3km/h

Around a 4k launch

FYI

ATR45G2.5 is my turbo @ ~340hp

Low 13's is definately possible, however 106mph means you aren't anywhere near 340rwhp.......

What have you changed in this new ss2.5? Is it a turbine change?

PM me if you would prefer

That BB SS2.5 has a larger turbine, that is only good for high flowing use. getting it back on the dyno Monday. The prototype SS2 had a different set of blades, making minor changes to boost ramp behavior.

I ran that exact time and speed with an S14 making 175rwkw with stock turbo.

my 60' was 1.8.

Unless your 60' was like 2.2 or higher and you missed gears a couple of times, it will be more than driver error that's the issue.

I ran that exact time and speed with an S14 making 175rwkw with stock turbo.

my 60' was 1.8.

Unless your 60' was like 2.2 or higher and you missed gears a couple of times, it will be more than driver error that's the issue.

Wow that's a huge difference in power

How much experience did you have prior to this run?

I don't know about 115mph, but 106mph is way low for ~250wkw. Quite an odd pattern forming!

Not wrong there, all the drags results are showing that you would be better off with a stock turbo.

Wow that's a huge difference in power

How much experience did you have prior to this run?

First and only time at drags.

Got 4 runs.

first one was a 14.4 then eventually got 13.8 on the 4th run.

I kept shifting at 7K (silly in an SR) and would just touch the rev limiter in 3rd as I crossed the line.

Could have possibly been quicker if I shifted earlier but never got to go back.

Car was a series 1 S14 with heavy 17s.

255s on the back with pressure reduced to about 22psi

Stock Clutch, FMIC, 1 bar boost, pod, exhaust and tuned SAFC II

Done by Yavus at Unigroup

175.4rwkw

Stock turbo and clutch do make it easier to launch more consistantly though.

And the SR20 is a different torque curve to the RB so possibly easier to control wheel spin.

Edit - I should take my current car (stock RB25 R32 gtst) to get some base times.

Edited by TTT

I don't know about 115mph, but 106mph is way low for ~250wkw. Quite an odd pattern forming!

Seems to be pretty normal

I did 13.32 with 112Mph that was stock weighted R34 with a pu high flow 280rwkws on street tyres. Stock turbo run 14.6 with 98mph on 12psi with 200rwkws

Edited by GeorgesR34

Seems to be pretty normal

I did 13.32 with 112Mph that was stock weighted R34 with a pu high flow 280rwkws on street tyres. Stock turbo run 14.6 with 98mph on 12psi with 200rwkws

Just to show you how off your figures are. My non turbo 300ZX trapped 97.6mph with ~130rwkw, yet your R34 had "200rwkw" ;) Trap speed tells no lies

Can a turbo perform better on a dyno than on the road?

Like could two turbos that makes 250rwkw with the similar power curve get totally different results on the road.

Very easily, what i don't understand is how these turbos keep underperforming on the drag strip.

Edited by Super Drager

Just to show you how off your figures are. My non turbo 300ZX trapped 97.6mph with ~130rwkw, yet your R34 had "200rwkw" ;) Trap speed tells no lies

Punching your 97.6mph trap speed into a drag strip calculator - to only have ~130rwkw you would need to be weighing around 1315kg - the 300zx non-turbo (from my googling around) is around 1460kg without a driver. That's not an insignificant weight difference. Not questioning you - just curious :)

Was going to say that - my Prelude needed around 130kw to pull 96-98mph trap speeds and weighed ~1330kg as raced, must be an ultra low reading dyno to do 97+ with a "130kw" 300ZX.

I'd hope for over 98mph with 200kw in an R33 too, though.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Welcome to Skyline ownership. Yes, it is entirely possible parts websites get things wrong. There's a whole world of inaccuracies out there when it comes to R34 stuff (and probably 33 and 32). Lots of things that are 'just bolt on, entirely interchangable' aren't. Even between S1 and S2 R34's. Yes they have a GTT item supposedly being 296mm. This is incorrect. I would call whoever you got them from and return them and let them know the GTT actually uses 310mm rotors. Depending on where you got them from your experience and success will obviously vary.
    • Hi...a bit a "development" on the brakes. I spoke to the guys where i get brakes from...and they are saying that 296mm EBC are for R34 GT-T. I then went to their site: https://www.ebcbrakes.com/vehicle/uk-row/NISSAN/Skyline (R34)/ and search for my car(R34 GT 1998 - it has GTT brakes) and it show me this USR1229 number and they are rly 296mm rotors... So now iam rly confused... The rotors i have now on the car are 310mm asi shown... So where is the problem? Does the whole EBC got it wrong or my calipers are just...idk know what?  
    • Oh What the hell, I used to get a "are you sure you want to reply, this thread is XX months old" message. Maybe a software update remove that. My bad.
    • This is a recipe for disaster* Note: Disaster is relative. The thing that often gets lost in threads like this is what is considered acceptable poke and compromise between what one person considers 'good' looks and what someone else does. The quoted specs would sit absurdly outside the guards with the spacers mentioned and need  REALLY thin tyres and a LOT of camber AND rolling the guards to fit. Some people love this. Some people consider this a ruined car. One thing is for certain though, rolling the guards is pretty much mandatory for any 'good' fitment (of either variety). It is often the difference between any fitment remotely close to the guards. "Not to mention the rears were like a mm from hitting the coilovers." I have a question though - This spec is VERY close to what I was planning to buy relative to the inboard suspension - I have an offset measuring tool on the way to confirm it. When you say "like a mm" do you mean literally 1mm? Or 2mm? Cause that's enough clearance for me in the rear :p I actually found the more limiting factor ISNT the coilover but the actual suspension arms. Did you take a look at how close those were?
    • @GTSBoy yeah sorry i know thery are known for colors bud those DBA are too in colors 🙂 Green will be good enough for me  
×
×
  • Create New...