Jump to content
SAU Community

Hypergear Turbochargers and High flow Services Development thread


Recommended Posts

Gee by the time I get my car 100% there's gonna be 100 new better turbos available.

Keep up the good work Stao!

If its off the car you can send it back to me for a update. The main difference in the SS2 would be the Type B rear housing and compressor housing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just came back from Drags :)

Very very happy

I can confirm its driver error that's causing my low times.

I think i could get a low 13s ( or a better driver )

Got a 13.822 @ 171.3km/h

Around a 4k launch

FYI

ATR45G2.5 is my turbo @ ~340hp

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just came back from Drags :)

Very very happy

I can confirm its driver error that's causing my low times.

I think i could get a low 13s ( or a better driver )

Got a 13.822 @ 171.3km/h

Around a 4k launch

FYI

ATR45G2.5 is my turbo @ ~340hp

Low 13's is definately possible, however 106mph means you aren't anywhere near 340rwhp.......

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What have you changed in this new ss2.5? Is it a turbine change?

PM me if you would prefer

That BB SS2.5 has a larger turbine, that is only good for high flowing use. getting it back on the dyno Monday. The prototype SS2 had a different set of blades, making minor changes to boost ramp behavior.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I ran that exact time and speed with an S14 making 175rwkw with stock turbo.

my 60' was 1.8.

Unless your 60' was like 2.2 or higher and you missed gears a couple of times, it will be more than driver error that's the issue.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I ran that exact time and speed with an S14 making 175rwkw with stock turbo.

my 60' was 1.8.

Unless your 60' was like 2.2 or higher and you missed gears a couple of times, it will be more than driver error that's the issue.

Wow that's a huge difference in power

How much experience did you have prior to this run?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wow that's a huge difference in power

How much experience did you have prior to this run?

First and only time at drags.

Got 4 runs.

first one was a 14.4 then eventually got 13.8 on the 4th run.

I kept shifting at 7K (silly in an SR) and would just touch the rev limiter in 3rd as I crossed the line.

Could have possibly been quicker if I shifted earlier but never got to go back.

Car was a series 1 S14 with heavy 17s.

255s on the back with pressure reduced to about 22psi

Stock Clutch, FMIC, 1 bar boost, pod, exhaust and tuned SAFC II

Done by Yavus at Unigroup

175.4rwkw

Stock turbo and clutch do make it easier to launch more consistantly though.

And the SR20 is a different torque curve to the RB so possibly easier to control wheel spin.

Edit - I should take my current car (stock RB25 R32 gtst) to get some base times.

Edited by TTT
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't know about 115mph, but 106mph is way low for ~250wkw. Quite an odd pattern forming!

Seems to be pretty normal

I did 13.32 with 112Mph that was stock weighted R34 with a pu high flow 280rwkws on street tyres. Stock turbo run 14.6 with 98mph on 12psi with 200rwkws

Edited by GeorgesR34
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Seems to be pretty normal

I did 13.32 with 112Mph that was stock weighted R34 with a pu high flow 280rwkws on street tyres. Stock turbo run 14.6 with 98mph on 12psi with 200rwkws

Just to show you how off your figures are. My non turbo 300ZX trapped 97.6mph with ~130rwkw, yet your R34 had "200rwkw" ;) Trap speed tells no lies

Can a turbo perform better on a dyno than on the road?

Like could two turbos that makes 250rwkw with the similar power curve get totally different results on the road.

Very easily, what i don't understand is how these turbos keep underperforming on the drag strip.

Edited by Super Drager
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just to show you how off your figures are. My non turbo 300ZX trapped 97.6mph with ~130rwkw, yet your R34 had "200rwkw" ;) Trap speed tells no lies

Punching your 97.6mph trap speed into a drag strip calculator - to only have ~130rwkw you would need to be weighing around 1315kg - the 300zx non-turbo (from my googling around) is around 1460kg without a driver. That's not an insignificant weight difference. Not questioning you - just curious :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Was going to say that - my Prelude needed around 130kw to pull 96-98mph trap speeds and weighed ~1330kg as raced, must be an ultra low reading dyno to do 97+ with a "130kw" 300ZX.

I'd hope for over 98mph with 200kw in an R33 too, though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Hi all, I need to get this HKS SLD attached to my stock ECU because I've now got the German autobahn and faster European circuits to contend with.  The car is a manual 2dr ER34 with an AT ECU and I've realised the AT ECU has two pins for speed sensor signals: Pin 29: Vehicle speed sensor signal (Vehicle speed sensor 2) Pin *58: Output shaft rotation sensor signal (Vehicle speed sensor 1) - *RB25DET A/T model only Before I go butchering this harness, is anyone sure of which pin is the correct one for signal adjustment? The attached document from HKS indicates pin 29 but I found this situation mentioned in the following thread on a different forum (R34 GTT Auto Trans Speed Cut Problem | Zerotohundred) mentioning pin 58 needing to be altered by member zephuros, albeit it seems to be for an RSM-GP and the info appears to be old.  R34_All_Workshop_Manual-pages-2.pdf R34_All_Workshop_Manual-pages-3.pdf R34_All_Workshop_Manual-pages-1.pdf HKS SLD Vehicle Pin out P59-P70 ER34-pages.pdf
    • Embrace the freedom of casual encounters on the best dating app in town! Verified Maidens Superlative Сasual Dating
    • Slimline sub on the rear parcel shelf is doable. Pioneer TS-WX140DA is only 70mm high.   
    • People like Johnny Dose Bro might be laughing at my post because I accidentally added 100mm to my numbers. 350-355 is indeed the lower limit. 450 is off-road Skyline spec.
    • What is the "compromise" that you think will happen? Are you thinking that something will get damaged? The only things you have to be concerned about with spherical jointed suspension arms are; Arguments with the constabulary wrt their legality (they are likely to be illegal for road use without an engineering certificatation, and that may not be possible to obtain). A lot more NVH transmitted through to the passengers (which is hardly a concern for those with a preference for good handling, anyway). Greatly increased inspection and maintenance requirements (see above points, both).   It is extremely necessary to ask what car you are talking about. Your discussion on strut tops, for example, would be completely wrong for an R chassis, but be correct for an S chassis. R32s have specific problems that R33/4 do not have. Etc. I have hardened rubber bushes on upper rear control arms and traction rods. Adjustable length so as to be able to set both camber and bump steer. You cannot contemplate doing just the control arms and not the traction arms. And whatever bushing you have in one you should have in the other so that they have similar characteristics. Otherwise you can get increased oddness of behaviour as one bushing flexes and the other doesn't, changing the alignment between them. I have stock lower rear arms with urethane bushes. I may make changes here, these are are driven by the R32's geometry problems, so I won't discuss them here unless it proves necessary. I have spherical joints in the front caster rods. I have experienced absolutely no negatives and only positives from doing so. They are massively better than any other option. I have sphericals in the FUCAs, but this is driven largely by the (again) R32 specific problems with the motion of those arms. I just have to deal with the increased maintenance required. Given how much better the front end behaves with the sphericals in there.....I'd probably be tempted to go away from my preference (which is not to have sphericals on a road car, for 2 of the 3 reasons in the bulleted list above), just to gain those improvements. And so my preference for not using sphericals (in general) on a road car should be obvious. I use them judiciously, though, as required to solve particular problems.
×
×
  • Create New...