Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

 

 

Yeah I meant I lined it all up to the timing marks and then checked and everything was pretty spot on

So did you check true TDC first using a piston stop? That's the critical part, if you don't get that exactly right then the rest of it won't mean much at all. If you did then that's about what I was expecting, I didn't expect mine to be out at all let alone by so much.

Hmmmmm mine were pretty much dropped in and good to go :/ maybe i was just lucky?

Well JEM also did your exhaust cam gear, do you know if that is zeroed? They have probably installed the cam gear and then adjusted it to where it performed best, essentially 'hiding' if the cams were out at all.

Your motor is completely stock right? Never had the head off? If so they might be ok.They are meant to be a full drop in... I think Trev and Martin have suffered because their motors have been apart in the past, with surfaces skimmed. Like mine also. It doesnt mean Tomei get the lobe centre spot on though... It might still be off, which is why they advertise specs so we can work it out.

I did think this might be what threw it out, but a couple of things are bugging me about it... 4.6 degrees and 7.8 degrees is a long way out. The inlet cam could have been messed with previously, but even if I ignore that, the exhaust was not adjustable. How much would a 0.003" skim throw out timing? Surely not almost 5 degrees. In used an OEM headgasket, so that hasn't changed.

but even if I ignore that, the exhaust was not adjustable. How much would a 0.003" skim throw out timing? Surely not almost 5 degrees. In used an OEM headgasket, so that hasn't changed.

My block was skimmed 0.004", stock head gasket, however head has been skimmed numurous times and I think I worked out about 20 thou total and both mine were 5.5 and 6 degrees from stock cam specs

Who knows what's up with yours :/

Martin your not working with stock cams so that must be the difference.

People only ever skim a few thou but the tool exists for a reason, clearly being that it does put them out.

Saw this ad on ebay:

http://www.ebay.com.au/itm/t25-Hypergear-G3-turbo-suit-sr20-pulsar-s13-s14-s15-/271200644398?pt=AU_Car_Parts_Accessories&hash=item3f24d16d2e&_uhb=1

Hypergear G3 turbo.

Standard T25 fitup.
My car ran 11.45 @ 121mph with this turbo.
What sort of turbo is this? pretty good time and mileage for a SR

That was a ATR28G4 turbo, That specific one is an older older model made around 2008. The current one is quite different, makes better power and response.

sl2ss2comps2.JPG

Got this tuned today. Big thanks to Status tuning as usual.

Just out of curiosity of what the 10cm L2 turbine can pump, We tried every thing to squeeze power out of and The maximum we've got it to was 385rwkws on 24psi. The car refused to make any more power after this.

At 22 psi it made 374rwkws so basically identical to SS2 at same boost level.

This goal of this turbocharger is to make more power then a T67 while having the same response to a 20G.

I've overlaid readings from:

Our brand new SLSS2 turbocharger

V

Latest SS2 turbocharger that has the identical compressor setup on slightly lower boost level.

V

The highest reading of a T67, Greddy manifold, externally gated.

All on Rb25det with stock cams.

ss2vsl2vt67power.jpg

ss2vsl2vt67boost.jpg

Well sarge, you have been underground for some time now...

Le test car now sports a high mount and E85, while the SS2 has since gone from 71mm hi/lo blade to 74mm full blade compressor. The SLSS2 is the SS2 compressor mated to a TD06SL2 turbine, like on the kando T67s.

it would be nice if stao could update the HG website with the wheel sizings for the ss range of present and old models.

just helps when you compare them to other turbo's for size and power out put

once again nice work with the new results above ^

it would be nice if stao could update the HG website with the wheel sizings for the ss range of present and old models.

just helps when you compare them to other turbo's for size and power out put

once again nice work with the new results above ^

Not a bad idea there.

Yes I will add some information into my site. Also as some of you already noticed the new domain is at:

www.hypergearturbos.com

The old domain still works as a back up and file storage.

As things getting a little more serious, I've got my self a set of of MickyThomasons ETs for Sunday's drag strip. I was hopping 265 x 16s which VPW run out, that I already bought a set of rims for. Those are 275 x 17s hopefully fits my current rim with much better grip

mtstreet.jpg.


RSRs (255 x 17) are for sale at $300 a pair if any one is interested. they are under 500Kms old, pretty much new with 95%+ threads. Good for 300rwkws class.

Compare to the very fist SS2 the comp wheels has been altered 5 times with 2x different types of compressor housing and 4 different types of housing profiles. They are obviously a much better performer externally gated on proper manifold as any other turbochargers.

The very first one are still capable of making over 350rwkws on E85. The current once can pump out 376rwkws with better response and much lower boost controller duty. I've got another reading to upload comparing the current SLSS2 V SS2 that is pretty interesting to be looked at in terms of difference in boost, power and torque delivery.

I'm also working on another SS2 prototype that is made to be externally gated only and more responsive then the current model.

The new SS2 is still WIP, almost complete. Will post results if the ideology works.

Car's having issues transferring power onto ground been a rear wheel drive. Getting slower times with more power. If this don't work then I will be going for a full set of cross ply wheels and tires.

That short shifter Trent complaint about has also been replaced with one came out of a OEM GTR. If every thing goes as planed we should be sitting at the 11s mark with 125m/h.

Got the 275 Micky thomasons on, they just cleared the guards and required 5mm spacers to miss the strut tower.

side.jpg

side2.jpg

under.jpg

Really good tries. With the SLSS2 doing 22psi full throttle lunch in 1st and 2nd it didn't slip a bit. Price wise it only cost me $285 each just $10 dear then the Federal RSRs. Highly recommended.

Would you use them on the street Stao or not recommended?

I think Dave (NYTSKY) does.... But not a daily etc....

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Welp, good to know. Will have to wait awhile until steady hands with drills and taps are available. In other news, these just arrived! I will weigh them for posterity.
    • 100% the factory sender is tapered, that is how it seals (well, that and teflon paste or tape)
    • Thanks folks - I've saved a few links and I'll have to think of potential cable/adapters/buying fittings. First step will be seeing if I can turn the curren abortion of a port into something usable, then get all BSPT'y on it. I did attempt to look at the OEM sender male end to see if it IS tapered because as mentioned you should be able to tell by looking at it... well, I don't know if I can. If I had to guess it looks like *maybe* 0.25 of a mm skinnier at the bottom of the thread compared to where the thread starts. So if it is tapered it's pretty slight - Or all the examples of BSPT vs BSPP are exaggerated for effect in their taper size.
    • Have a look at that (shitty) pic I posted. You can see AN -4 braided line coming to a -4 to 1/8 BSPT adapter, into a 1/8 BSPT T piece. The Haltech pressure sender is screwed into the long arm of the sender and factory sender (pre your pic) into the T side. You can also see the cable tie holding the whole contraption in place. Is it better than mounting the sender direct to your engine fitting......yes because it removes that vibration as the engine revs out 50 times every lap and that factory sender is pretty big. Is it necessary for you......well I've got no idea, I just don't like something important failing twice so over-engineer it to the moon!
    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
×
×
  • Create New...