Jump to content
SAU Community

Hypergear Turbochargers and High flow Services Development thread


Recommended Posts

321rwhp @20psi. 4psi more boost has got me 30hp less than my previous tune.

No symptoms this time. Tuner double checked my cam timing, said I got it spot on. He even tried playing with the exhaust cam gear, but best results were where I had it. Set base ignition timing before it went on the dyno. IAT's are fine, not getting hot. It had no problems taking boost, it wasn't misfiring, it had plenty of fuel. It just doesn't make power. And I'm stumped.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wow man that's no good. Don't worry though man, if the engine's healthy (certainly sounds like it is) then it's just a matter of time until you find the cause.

Keep methodically checking through the possible causes and you'll nail it eventually.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hopefully not but, are you sure the turbo is ok?

What do the graphs look like?

Mabye the turbo is a dud?

You might need to swap turbo out for a "spare"

See what another turbo does
That way you can rule that out?

Edited by jay-rod
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't really think there should be much issues on the design of the turbocharger since every one's made 320hp+ on fair basic mods on stock cams. I'll be happy to check and update it to the most recent profile if Halando is happy to send it.

T04Z I've engineered the comp wheels in couple of different sizes and blade shaps. I like to see what they can do on the GT35 based turbine wheel first. The T04Z turbine might be too laggy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Its going to be laggy as on my Rb25det. I guess it doesn't really matter used with launch control. Not sure if my fuel system is good enough for the maximum capability of that turbo, but will post result after I get it build and trailed.

Also was that VL on stock drive shaft? I abit concert it might bent or snap at that sort of power level.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

yeh, has a one piece tailshaft and 31 spline axles..has done 70 odd passes though, although the gearsets(in the diff) are the weak point

having said that, the standard axles and driveshaft will last a fair while on slicks with a manual and forever with a auto

I only ever ran stock 28 spline axles and stock 2 piece driveshaft in my r31,never broke a axle, but busted the original

centre bearing in the driveshaft , reconned it and it was fine..auto though, they are soft on a drivetrain..

cheers

darren

Edited by jet_r31
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I really wish I could get my hands on Martin's car.... I would love to pull the motor and just reassemble everything bit by bit.. Its GOT to have a f**king problem.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

321rwhp @20psi. 4psi more boost has got me 30hp less than my previous tune.

No symptoms this time. Tuner double checked my cam timing, said I got it spot on. He even tried playing with the exhaust cam gear, but best results were where I had it. Set base ignition timing before it went on the dyno. IAT's are fine, not getting hot. It had no problems taking boost, it wasn't misfiring, it had plenty of fuel. It just doesn't make power. And I'm stumped.

That sucks. This is on BP98? Did the tuner have any comments on anything that he may have found suspicious?

When making less power than expected without misfires or any other obvious issues it is possible you could have one of these things happening (which the tuner will see). I don't clearly remember the history of your car so not sure if I am making redundant comments - sorry!

- Overly knock limited... this can be caused by all sorts of things, easiest to check or identify on your car would be to identify if the CAS triggering seems to be working properly

- Reaching MBT sooner than you'd expect (not due to knock - just not gaining torque as the timing advances) can happen if something is stopping cylinder pressures from climbing they should, can be a valve actuation issue

- Fuel demand lower than you'd expect, or falling over. I'd tend to put this down to a restriction, as it basically means your overall volumetric efficiency is down due to something - if you need less fuel than another car making the power you expect you should, and with the same target AFRs, then it means less air is passing through the system. You aren't going to make the power without the air flow required to do so

Just a couple of quick thoughts, may or may not be worth anything - but this situation of you having issues has been going too long and it'd be good to see you with a happy result so anything at this point can't be a waste, right? :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

very interested to se how the ss2 vnt turbo goes for the 330rwkw mark may be better choice then a t67 in my drift car if the response is there

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Both billet SS2 and SLSS2 are more responsive with higher output then a normal T67. Check page 388.

The VNT model is targeting towards SS1 .64's response while making SS2's power. I will post further details as it gets installed and tuned.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That sucks. This tune on BP98? Did the tuner have any comments on anything that he may have found suspicious? When making less power than expected without misfires or any other obvious issues it is possible you could have one of these things happening (which the tuner will see). I don't clearly remember the history of your car so not sure if I am making redundant comments - sorry! - Overly knock limited... this can be caused by all sorts of things, easiest to check or identify on your car would be to identify if the CAS triggering seems to be working properly - Reaching MBT sooner than you'd expect (not due to knock - just not gaining torque as the timing advances) can happen if something is stopping cylinder pressures from climbing they should, can be a valve actuation issue - Fuel demand lower than you'd expect, or falling over. I'd tend to put this down to a restriction, as it basically means your overall volumetric efficiency is down due to something - if you need less fuel than another car making the power you expect you should, and with the same target AFRs, then it means less air is passing through the system. You aren't going to make the power without the air flow required to do so Just a couple of quick thoughts, may or may not be worth anything - but this situation of you having issues has been going too long and it'd be good to see you with a happy result so anything at this point can't be a waste, right? :)

Thanks mate, definitely appreciate any input as I'm completely stumped. Nothing crushes motivation more than being so sure you have finally found the problem, only to go even further backwards.

Unfortunately, my tuner said the car didn't miss a beat and was really easy to tune. It behaved perfectly, didn't show any signs of anything being wrong. If I hadn't told him that it was 30hp down from its last tune and almost 100hp down from where I expected it to be then he would have thought it went really well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I know it's not PC to say in here but you have tried pretty much everything except for changing the turbo...

Yeh, I'd be willing to give it a go if it wasn't such an expensive exercise. The whole underpowered thing seems to have always been around on mine. Even on the stock turbo, I was only making 220rwhp @14psi. Then both G2's that I used only made 295rwhp. I had put that down to the stock ECU pulling timing and fuel, but now I don't know...

30hp would be in the expected range with a different dyno though wouldnt it?

It definitely feels slower now. It feels like my previous low boost setting. Quieter too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Hi all, I need to get this HKS SLD attached to my stock ECU because I've now got the German autobahn and faster European circuits to contend with.  The car is a manual 2dr ER34 with an AT ECU and I've realised the AT ECU has two pins for speed sensor signals: Pin 29: Vehicle speed sensor signal (Vehicle speed sensor 2) Pin *58: Output shaft rotation sensor signal (Vehicle speed sensor 1) - *RB25DET A/T model only Before I go butchering this harness, is anyone sure of which pin is the correct one for signal adjustment? The attached document from HKS indicates pin 29 but I found this situation mentioned in the following thread on a different forum (R34 GTT Auto Trans Speed Cut Problem | Zerotohundred) mentioning pin 58 needing to be altered by member zephuros, albeit it seems to be for an RSM-GP and the info appears to be old.  R34_All_Workshop_Manual-pages-2.pdf R34_All_Workshop_Manual-pages-3.pdf R34_All_Workshop_Manual-pages-1.pdf HKS SLD Vehicle Pin out P59-P70 ER34-pages.pdf
    • Embrace the freedom of casual encounters on the best dating app in town! Verified Maidens Superlative Сasual Dating
    • Slimline sub on the rear parcel shelf is doable. Pioneer TS-WX140DA is only 70mm high.   
    • People like Johnny Dose Bro might be laughing at my post because I accidentally added 100mm to my numbers. 350-355 is indeed the lower limit. 450 is off-road Skyline spec.
    • What is the "compromise" that you think will happen? Are you thinking that something will get damaged? The only things you have to be concerned about with spherical jointed suspension arms are; Arguments with the constabulary wrt their legality (they are likely to be illegal for road use without an engineering certificatation, and that may not be possible to obtain). A lot more NVH transmitted through to the passengers (which is hardly a concern for those with a preference for good handling, anyway). Greatly increased inspection and maintenance requirements (see above points, both).   It is extremely necessary to ask what car you are talking about. Your discussion on strut tops, for example, would be completely wrong for an R chassis, but be correct for an S chassis. R32s have specific problems that R33/4 do not have. Etc. I have hardened rubber bushes on upper rear control arms and traction rods. Adjustable length so as to be able to set both camber and bump steer. You cannot contemplate doing just the control arms and not the traction arms. And whatever bushing you have in one you should have in the other so that they have similar characteristics. Otherwise you can get increased oddness of behaviour as one bushing flexes and the other doesn't, changing the alignment between them. I have stock lower rear arms with urethane bushes. I may make changes here, these are are driven by the R32's geometry problems, so I won't discuss them here unless it proves necessary. I have spherical joints in the front caster rods. I have experienced absolutely no negatives and only positives from doing so. They are massively better than any other option. I have sphericals in the FUCAs, but this is driven largely by the (again) R32 specific problems with the motion of those arms. I just have to deal with the increased maintenance required. Given how much better the front end behaves with the sphericals in there.....I'd probably be tempted to go away from my preference (which is not to have sphericals on a road car, for 2 of the 3 reasons in the bulleted list above), just to gain those improvements. And so my preference for not using sphericals (in general) on a road car should be obvious. I use them judiciously, though, as required to solve particular problems.
×
×
  • Create New...