Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

That above is a ATR43SSG4 core, so similar what it originally was.

The VNT system do work and I've been using them a while now for anti lag. This specific method has the potential to knock off about 500RPMs of lag without trading off power. How ever has to be very specific to the amount of back pressure the turbine housing is receiving. Little like setting up Ign timing which at specific point they will allow the engine to output its highest torque while otherwise results the opposite. Some thing worked so well on the RB25det worked horribly on the Kia's High comp G4GC motor. So getting this to work on the Rb30det it will require a new round of research and development.

Posting an result. This is from a SS2 Based High flow that we did for a Auto M35 stagea not too long ago. It made 275rwkws on 20psi with Pump 98 fuel.

Note: The WOT was engaged in a slow manner on run below, for the reliability of factory Auto.

power.JPG

boost.JPG

That pic raises another question Tao , is the compressor housing on your turbo a 0.70 AR T04B one ? The larger ratio B housing is one we don't see too often though I don't know why . It would have a bit more flow capacity than the 0.60AR B housing while being more compact than the T04E or T04S ones .

0.70AR B housings have larger 2.5" (63mm) outlets like 0.70 AR S ones .

A .

And any one into Nissan patrol 4.2L Diesels ? High flowed stock turbo made 121awkws on 15psi maxing out stock fuel pump. Stock turbocharger maxed at 81awkws.

ht18fronts.jpg

powers.jpg

  • Like 1

My SLSS2 turned up today

Looks good sitting next to my old highflow paperweight :)attachicon.gifImageUploadedBySAU Community1399964974.687270.jpg

WTF happened to that compressor wheel? What highflow was that?

WTF happened to that compressor wheel? What highflow was that?

It is a Kinugawa highflow. The oil feed line let go while coming onto the highway in second at high revs.

post-34692-14000495096698_thumb.jpg

  • Like 1

Hoookay

Some initial feedback on the TD06SL220.5G

My car is hardly sorted atm

but is as follows

Dead Standard 1JZ-GTE and Auto

ETM 6 into 1 merge collector manifold

Hypergear 50mm External gate

3" dump pipe into a 2 1/4" mid pipe into a 2 1/4" twin system (yuck!)

factory ECU

So initial drive

Builds boost at around the same RPM as the standard turbos...but feels like it needs a little more throttle to do so

Once it sees around 0.2bar and 3000ish rpm it comes on like a light switch even at under half throttle (no WOT runs re: standard ECU) running the 0.8Bar gate pressure

This combo is going to have a monster mid range once I finish the new exhaust (3.5" with a Hooker super comp aero chamber muffler) and fit the ECU and fuel system

but I feel it is not going to be linear, feels like it will always be a light switch turbo, but comes on early enough to not be a huge worry, however I will report back once its tuned and I drive it in the wet.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • For once a good news  It needed to be adjusted by that one nut and it is ok  At least something was easy But thank you very much for help. But a small issue is now(gearbox) that when the car is stationary you can hear "clinking" from gearbox so some of the bearing is 100% not that happy... It goes away once you push clutch so it is 100% gearbox. Just if you know...what that bearing could be? It sounding like "spun bearing" but it is louder.
    • Yeah, that's fine**. But the numbers you came up with are just wrong. Try it for yourself. Put in any voltage from the possible range and see what result you get. You get nonsense. ** When I say "fine", I mean, it's still shit. The very simple linear formula (slope & intercept) is shit for a sensor with a non-linear response. This is the curve, from your data above. Look at the CURVE! It's only really linear between about 30 and 90 °C. And if you used only that range to define a curve, it would be great. But you would go more and more wrong as you went to higher temps. And that is why the slope & intercept found when you use 50 and 150 as the end points is so bad halfway between those points. The real curve is a long way below the linear curve which just zips straight between the end points, like this one. You could probably use the same slope and a lower intercept, to move that straight line down, and spread the error out. But you would 5-10°C off in a lot of places. You'd need to say what temperature range you really wanted to be most right - say, 100 to 130, and plop the line closest to teh real curve in that region, which would make it quite wrong down at the lower temperatures. Let me just say that HPTuners are not being realistic in only allowing for a simple linear curve. 
    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
×
×
  • Create New...