Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

25 minutes ago, silviaz said:

I thought that the high flowed rb25det turbos were a lot more responsive than the stock one? Would that mean better low end torque?

Greater amount of energy is required to turn larger wheels up to speed, there for laggier. However bigger wheels are capable of flowing greater amount of air through both housings, let the engine burn more fuel and makes more power that way.   

  • Like 2
1 hour ago, hypergear said:

Greater amount of energy is required to turn larger wheels up to speed, there for laggier. However bigger wheels are capable of flowing greater amount of air through both housings, let the engine burn more fuel and makes more power that way.   

That makes sense.

  • 1 month later...

Got my 34 gtt dyno tuned with the G3 turbo (the one rated for 450). Dyno reads 8% lower than actual numbers. Car made 309 whp on 14 psi. Stock manifolds. 650 injectors. Walbro pump. Mac valve boost controller. Haltech ecu. 

F984A261-3205-4AF1-B05E-5954BAB7B400.jpeg

On 23/12/2024 at 12:29 PM, SeanR32GtSt said:

Got my 34 gtt dyno tuned with the G3 turbo (the one rated for 450). Dyno reads 8% lower than actual numbers. Car made 309 whp on 14 psi. Stock manifolds. 650 injectors. Walbro pump. Mac valve boost controller. Haltech ecu. 

F984A261-3205-4AF1-B05E-5954BAB7B400.jpeg

Is your VCT working?

That curve looks like your VCT isn't engaging 

1 hour ago, SeanR32GtSt said:

That’s a good question. I’m not sure. It feels laggy for sure. How can I diagnose that?

Unplug it and see if the car makes a difference 

Might also needs a stronger actuator with the right preloading. With older 2019 built bush G3 units, BB upgrade or 21U housing down size makes a pretty decent gain in response as well. 

31 minutes ago, hypergear said:

Might also needs a stronger actuator with the right preloading. With older 2019 built bush G3 units, BB upgrade or 21U housing down size makes a pretty decent gain in response as well. 

I know this one’s the BB one. My tuner did make mention about the actuator. I am curious about the VCT as well

  • 4 weeks later...

Updating results from our ATR43SS-1 turbo in T3 .63, OEM bolt dump pattern. Not a big number but pretty sweet for a stock Rb20det. Car's managed to pull 220rwkws at 20psi, perfect boost control internally gated with EBC and excellent mid top end power band as they usually skydive after 5.5K. Usual bolt on supporting mods and inlet plenum and factory location exhaust manifold. Pump 98 fuel was used (Ron 93). 

 

472743624_1149138503880875_3584748054602940198_n.thumb.jpg.fbbc7040db2845e074e5ff6708a626a4.jpg

 

472847141_1149136430547749_2087549953757413747_n.thumb.jpg.cb51c05751c4baf6135d354a72495a4d.jpg

  • Like 2

IMG_20250115_174239.thumb.jpg.14910101692a1cbe7aecb3df560fd3fc.jpg                     IMG_20250115_174439.thumb.jpg.f02ffd0d26f11044d7f8300d20cd461a.jpg

I’m doing some side developments on SR20det S13 engines, its one my hobby cars used it to compare flow capacity of some smaller size wheels. SR20det is one of another JDM legendary engines I'm sure there are plenty of SR enthusiasts on this forum, I will share results some common turbo configurations here.

a quick run down of what the car is:
Wide body 180sx Type X with black top engine (blue). It has:
Stock bottom end
Haltech 1500 ECU
5-0 motorsports trigger kit
Kelford SR20DET Beehive Spring with Titanium Retainers
Kelford Cams SR20DET S13 188-B 268/272 Cams
G25-660 Turbocharger in T2 .64 rear housing internally gated
ARP Head studs
MLS head gasket
1000CC ID injectors
Walbro 450L Fuel pump
Front mount cooler kit
JJR’s 3 inches turbo back exhaust (its too short for the 180sx it had to be extended)
Pump 98 fuel
Hub Dyno tune

So far made 270rwkws at 22psi full boost by 4500RPM. Engine is very knock limited hence a pretty bad looking top end. From previous experiences it seems like SR20dets are happier with bigger size turbine, some thing like a GT30 would make way better top end, but on same time response is lost. It won't be a problem with S15 VCT engines. I'll be testing alternative turbine housing, turbine wheel and possibly dump pipe options for extra flow to resolve the problem and of course E85 would resolve all the issues.  

IMG20241109144240.thumb.jpg.0683fefbe2e07ee42badef0cb24ccce3.jpg  IMG20250115101823.thumb.jpg.1ab8bc14fcfd1ecf5ab04b662adfd74f.jpg

 

IMG20250115110523_01.thumb.jpg.a287a81eee5f5732db5b3f19fbf861d4.jpg  

20250115151627_001.thumb.jpg.63d3cc1dd0bf927f7d9e6ca9d11c81d2.jpg

20250115151627_002.thumb.jpg.67bcdd5efe0a5acc06a9b4ba1be4ff91.jpg

 

5 hours ago, hypergear said:

From previous experiences it seems like SR20dets are happier with bigger size turbine, some thing like a GT30 would make way better top end, but on same time response is lost

Here's one I help build and tuned a decade ago, Garrett  GTX3071R Gen 1, T3 twin scroll 0.83 rear housing. Went from larger 272 cams down to smaller Tomei Poncams to help with the low end. S13 non VCT motor. Car was purpose built for the track, hence low down was the focus.

Note the actual dyno chart shows lower boost, however the EBC and boost gauge showed 1.9Bar

(Ignore the torque, I was young and didn't know how to set derived torque)

20160702_135044.thumb.jpg.55d6327587defa7fccaaea27d073e153.jpg

 

  • Thanks 1
On 14/11/2024 at 8:49 PM, hypergear said:

We've been working on all sort of different types of turbos with majority of work load shifting towards Euros in the last few years. The Skylines are more of a hobbie then a daily, at least its like that in Australia. I will update photos from some of our latest RB jobs. Whats recent is G30 turbine housing externally gated plumb back kit using T3 .83 geninue housing. It can be made to suit G35, G40 and G42 units. External gate optional. 

 

IMG20241114115712.jpg

That’s a beautiful setup Tao,

Have u done any development with the new Turbosmart 40mm electronic straight gate, especially in this G30 configuration?

  • 3 weeks later...

Sharing results from recent Liberty Walk R35 GTR, since they are still considered as somesort of a V36 Skyline. We do them turbos too. This are high flowed SS-1 models with ball bearing conversion done. 

Car have managed to pull 485awkws @ 20Psi so far pushing limitations of factory built engine. The build list for R35 GTR enthusiasts as follow :
HyperGear high flowed stock turbos in SS1 (G25-660 specs)
Custom titanium intake pipes.
Vspec performance titanium front pipes.
Vspec performance 4" titanium exhaust.
Upgrade fuel pumps.
1200cc injectors.
Ignition coilpacks
Hks intake plenum.
Hks intercooler piping.
Greddy intercooler.
Greddy bovs.
Top-secret coolant reservoir.
Emtron ecu.
Straight E85.
Built gear box.

ARI09870.thumb.jpg.22bce678cccb8c0bf35af9eaa74c9236.jpg

ARI09826.thumb.jpg.86a563c61585e990ff69ccf264095afc.jpg

ARI00183.thumb.jpg.a89c7de67a94657d30e987827d607ccf.jpg

IMG20240823175443.thumb.jpg.fd9b27cbf6bb6139fb447103a22b6fdc.jpg

r35gtr483awkwe85.thumb.jpg.a0612000d240d722fca793f19d15f4e0.jpg

 

Edited by hypergear
  • Like 2

Result of another R35GTR build. Similar specs as above except this is running our bigger size SS-2 profile option. Made similar power except this car runs on Pump 98 fuel. Build specs are:

Nissan R35 GTR 2015 model stock engine and box.
ETS street intercooler
boost logi intercooler piping with tial bov, boost logi turbo inlet pipe
ID 1050 injector
DW 300C fuel pump
Decatted oem down pipe and y pipe& HKS exaust
3inch intake pipe
Upgraded actautors
HyperGear SS-2 high flow option
Final result is 639whp / 477wkws hubs, Ron 93 / P98 fuel at 20psi.

 

r35gtr477awkwp98.thumb.jpg.bcf7caa6342c4f85052302e63e05c624.jpg

  • Like 1
  • 1 month later...

Updating results following our SR20det project. Data collected form improves future turbocharger making and high flowing services. So far differences between G and GT series turbine wheels, we are in the process of making a new turbine, the aim is for better mid top range flow without gain too much lag. 

Result is back to back comparison of G25-660 and GTX2867 spec turbochargers on the same car, nothing changed apart from turbocharger. Both tuned to knock limit from pump 98 fuel (US Ron93). GTX2867 was about 400RPM more responsive making 255rwkws while G25-660 made 17 extra Kws with wider spread of torque after 4500RPM finishing off at 272rwkws.

IMG20250312111420.thumb.jpg.24681ad2a3aca8a567a2c25955dfcccb.jpg

powerlabeled.thumb.jpg.259bc01efa4ee3ac107f03376ad4ddaa.jpg

boostlabeled.thumb.jpg.4e7a989a27dca72ab75b586bde821f4a.jpg

 

On 1/16/2025 at 6:43 PM, hypergear said:

Updating results from our ATR43SS-1 turbo in T3 .63, OEM bolt dump pattern. Not a big number but pretty sweet for a stock Rb20det. Car's managed to pull 220rwkws at 20psi, perfect boost control internally gated with EBC and excellent mid top end power band as they usually skydive after 5.5K. Usual bolt on supporting mods and inlet plenum and factory location exhaust manifold. Pump 98 fuel was used (Ron 93). 

 

472743624_1149138503880875_3584748054602940198_n.thumb.jpg.fbbc7040db2845e074e5ff6708a626a4.jpg

 

472847141_1149136430547749_2087549953757413747_n.thumb.jpg.cb51c05751c4baf6135d354a72495a4d.jpg

How does this compare to the internally gated g25-550 in terms of power production at same psi and spool

14 hours ago, jdmser said:

How does this compare to the internally gated g25-550 in terms of power production at same psi and spool

Consider it as a G25-550 in a T3 .63 rear housing. So performance wise will be very similar. 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I will rebutt this and the preceding point from Dose....but without doing any calcs to demonstrate anything and without knowing that I am right or wrong. But... The flow capacity of a fluid transfer system is not limited by the smallest orifice or section of conduit in that system, unless it is drastically smaller than the rest of the system. OK, I use the word drastically perhaps with too much emphasis, but let's drill down on what I really mean. The flow capacity of the system is the result of the sum of the restrictions of the entire system. So, to make an extreme example, if you have a network with 3" pipe everywhere (and let's say a total length of only a few metres) and that 12mm ID restriction of the oil filter connection being the obvious restriction, then for any given amount of pressure available, the vast majority of all the pressure drop in the system is going to occur in the 12mm restriction. But.... increase the length of the 3" pipeline to, say 1000m, and suddenly the pipe pressure loss will likely add up to either be in the same order of magnitude, possibly even exceeding that of the 12mm restriction. Now the 12mm restriction starts to matter less. Translate this to the actual engine, actual oil cooler hose sizing, etc etc, and perhaps: The pressure loss caused by flowing through the narrow section (being the 12mm oil filter port, and perhaps any internal engine oil flow pathways associated with it) is a certain number. The pressure loss through, say, -12 hoses out to the cooler and back is negligible, but The pressure loss through -10 hoses out to the cooler, at the exact same length as the above, starts to become a decent fraction of the loss through the 12mm stuff at the filter port. Maybe even it starts to exceed it. I could actually do these calcs if I knew 1) how much oil was actually flowing in the line, 2) gave enough of a f**k to do things that I hate doing for work, voluntarily for a hypothetical discussion. Anyway - I reiterate. It's not the narrowest port that necessarily determines how much it can all flow. It is the sum. A long enough length of seemingly fat enough pipe can still cause more loss than a semmingly dominant small bore restriction.
    • To pick up what Dose is putting down. Not a lot of point running a huge hose if the motor is still restricted to the smaller size... It's only capable of flowing so much at that point...   *Waits for GTSBoy to come in and bring in the technicalities of length of pipe, and additional restriction from wall friction etc etc*
    • Hooley Dooley these things have some history! If i sell them they will need a certificate of providence to prove they have been in the hands of verified RB20 royalty! They have been stored in a plastic tub, away from sunlight and moisture. They are in mint condition. And they will stay that way, as i have sprung the money for a set of shockworks coilovers. I'm just working on getting them in at the moment, after rebushing the rear of the car, and while the subframe was out i welded in the GKtech reinforcement bracing as well.  They will get a workout at Ararat King of The Hill in November. I ran 48s on the short course there a few months ago, and i am hoping with new bushes and shocks in the rear i can launch a bit harder. There was a fair bit of axle tramp when i tried too hard off the line. a few of the corners had dips mid way which also made the car feel a bit unsettled, hopefully this will help there too.   
    • Food for thought, the stock oil filter thread is a 3/4-16 UNF, which has an ID of about 10 to 12mm (according to ChatGPT lol). Now compare than to an 10AN, which has an ID of about 14mm (Raceworks is 14.2mm, Speed flow is 14.27mm).  
    • Yep, totally get that. However hooking in for Generator back up is only a few hundred bucks for the wiring. You could put a couple of those in (for different circuits explicitly) and run a couple of baby generators. Bonus, you can balance them across different circuits, and now have backups in your backup. I'm looking at buying places that won't even have water etc, and I don't mind the idea of getting off the electric grid either, even with everything you've said. This country already has enough power outages that even the mains grid isn't that reliable anymore. I do agree though on spending a bit more to get better gear, and to add some extra redundancy in to the system too.
×
×
  • Create New...