Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I normally test in 98 as E85 is not widely available at this stage. Run that fuel with a good tuner you can get a turbo spooling up 500RPMs faster with heaps more mid range and top end power. It also keeps the EGT low which makes the engine safe and happy.

I've managed 297rwkws with a bolton G3 on a Mainlane roller dyno and 303rwkws with same turbo at status Hub dyno on 20psi of boost, that was with a factory engine internally gated. I've made it but I can't assure that you can get the same unless you have the exact same mods done by the same tuner. The turbo it self is capable of doing it no worries.

400RWHP or 300rwkws would be the limit on pump 98 fuel, internal gated, on stock manifold.

Will the G3 or SS3 like having 24-26PSI choked out of it? I have a need to blow my 25 so the wife "Approves the 3L rebuild" <- By approved I mean has no choice but let me.

Car has been off the road for 7 months now and since i bought a scooter to get too and from work a daily is no longer needed.

Yes i think ile be doing that, honestly if it doesnt hit 400rwhp it wont matter, at 200kw it spins 3rd, just some tracks have massive straights and i cant pull 4th without it bogging down, most of the time 100kw gain = 1 more gear frying haha =P

You should get close. I'm making 393rwhp @18psi. Have asked my tuner to wind it up to 20 when he retunes it next week, so we will see how it goes. I think it should crack 400.

Its good to have documentation from all range of supporting mods working with the turbo. I will index them in the main page.

I've been taken some time off working on my electric turbo again. lol here are some latest updates:

making.jpg

The new charger runs of 44V 120AMP of power from a 2x 6S power source with RPM controller.

incar2.jpg

I've installed it on to a Daihatsu Sirion with a 3cyc 0.97L engine. This car makes from 0 to 100KMs in 21secs factory. lol

After appling the charger in 3rd gear full throttle it actually made the Speedo rising a tinny bit faster. There is a just noticeably acceleration gain with the charger is activated and not. I'm installing it on the R33 for dyno runs next weekend. hopefully making better result then the previous one.

Plus I'm working on a VNT .82 rear housing for the G3s hopefully getting SS1PU's response with 330rwkws top end.

I'm would be very keen to be a test mule for this.How long roughly till you have a working version as I have been searching high and low for a variable gometry Turbo. And would the cost be significantly more?

WIll have to control the Nozzles with an Actuator, and then another one for wastegate. So will need 2x actuators to have it working. The SS3 externally gated version is $1150, I would perfer if the external gate was run from the exhaust manifold. Will produce much better result.

Sign me up for the SS3 conversion of my turbo Stao. As long as it will fit on a top mount manifold. The manifold has an outlet for a 44mm Wastegate so it should be a good test bed for this turbo.

How long till you have it ready. I don't mind waiting a month or 2 not in too much of a hurry.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I found a supplier for an arm in NZ. https://thrashgaragenz.com/products/nissan-skyline-v35-z33-350z-front-lower-straight-arm-rh-side?srsltid=AfmBOopMdfCFDc_8yVZZ9kq5nIngPHRTBzUU8v4SAptJaRO52Wjs0bC6 I looked closely at the photo of that one and the Z1 arm, and it's the same bloody arm. Scratches all match in the photo 😂 How hard is it to change that joint? Also they seem to be listing two options https://thrashgaragenz.com/products/nissan-skyline-v35-z33-350z-front-lower-straight-arm-balljoint-rh-side?_pos=1&_sid=229acde44&_ss=r And now I have no idea what size I'd need yay
    • Ill review it again, from memory when I first saw some of Trailer Park Boys I wasn't a huge fan. I ended up at Letter Kenny after watching Shoresy, which is a bit ass backward, ha ha
    • "lol dunno" either But like you, I can't see any reason they would need to be different LHD to RHD
    • I agree with you WRT the hard top. MX5's may be one of the better looking soft tops but I cannot think of ANY car, EVER that looks better with a soft top vs a hard top (or a designed roof). At all, ever. I also feel this way about the C5 Vette, the Z06 looks horrible compared to it's original form, it has an exaggerated version of the differences you're talking about.  
    • Hey crew, Failed my WOF cause of a lower control arm, and I've decided to hit both arms, and also the compression rods at the same time(seems they're gonna be the most likely upcoming failure points from some discussions with the lads over on the G35 reddit). I've looking at these form Z1:  https://www.z1motorsports.com/front-suspension/hayaku-automotive/hayaku-g35-front-compression-rod-p-40716.html https://www.z1motorsports.com/front-suspension/hayaku-automotive/hayaku-g35-front-lower-control-arm-p-40674.html I asked Z1 if they'd work as it's the same platform, just RHD vs LHD. I basically got told "Lol dunno". Specifically they aren't aware of any difference but can't guarantee fitment as they haven't done it on a 350GT. So guess I'm asking is if there is any issues with using 2005 G35 coupe suspension parts on a 2005 350GT coupe? Orginally I thought it could be something in the way of the arms that each control arm is designed to be positioned around, but that'd be an engineering nightmare for Nissan needing two different shaped control arms 😅
×
×
  • Create New...