Jump to content
SAU Community

Hypergear Turbochargers and High flow Services Development thread


Recommended Posts

The current one is capable of 330rwkws. I'm looking to trade that 30kws for roughly 300rpms of response making full boost of 20psi by 3900 Rpm instead of current 4200 rpm.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'll finally be buying a turbo off you around July so ill see where your at with FNT and VNT designs of the G3 then. VNT sounds like it will be great if its a reality that soon

Link to comment
Share on other sites

After studying motion of the vnt turbine setup I'm wondering if it actually creep heat when the nozzles directs in opposing direction. Appears the nozzle arrangement needs to be reset from scratch for it to work. Or for what I want it to do.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've contacted Matt to see if he might know what could cause the corruption, as everything was perfect a month a go when I last drove the car.

There's Nistune documentation that talks about ECU corruption and how it can be caused. Worth a read. A loose Nistune board is just one path to corruption.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There's Nistune documentation that talks about ECU corruption and how it can be caused. Worth a read. A loose Nistune board is just one path to corruption.

Ah great, do you know which of the documents it's in? I've contacted Matt about it but he hasn't replied yet.

Thing is, I didn't touch anything related to the ECU, and it was perfect when I drove it in. Surely it has to be something related to my messing around with it all, it's not just coincidence?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

After studying motion of the vnt turbine setup I'm wondering if it actually creep heat when the nozzles directs in opposing direction. Appears the nozzle arrangement needs to be reset from scratch for it to work. Or for what I want it to do.

So this is going to take a while?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks for that mate.

Makes me wonder whether the message was passed on that my ECU has a Stagea image in it. I forgot to tell Sean when I dropped the car off, but I phoned up and let them know, the bloke was confused but he said he would write it down. Now I wonder whether or not he told Sean before he started trying to tune it, if he tried to use the R34 image with my ECU then it wouldn't have worked. I'll have to give them a call tomorrow morning and get hold of Sean himself.

Edited by Hanaldo
Link to comment
Share on other sites

You might be able to get away with editing the fuel & ignition maps (and most other normal tables and scalars) in the Stagea image using the R34 address file, because I've been doing essentially that myself over the last few days. Load up the Stagea address file, then the bin file for what's in my ECU, then an R34 bin as comparison, and looking to see where the differences are. As you'd expect, the two ECUs are essentially the same. Same ECU, same engine. Just a few differences in the ABS/TCS department.

But....because you can do that, it might be very easy for the tuner to use an R34 address file, load up an R34 bin file, then sync from the ECU and or/ sync to the ECU and perhaps cause havoc. Just because there are some differences.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

depending on how much problems I might encounter. would be couple of month at least.

Sweet as. ill keep an eye out

I'm waiting till July now till I get something so if its not far off by then I might just wait.

Sounds like it will be impressive :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This assembly should have some effects, With the device engaged the turbo gains faster response how ever the engine pins up top, with it disengaged the motor picks up 8 degrees of timing up top but loses big chunk of power band down low. So I want it to be engaged till about 20psi then slowly released after that point to gain the top end timing. That way we should have fat power band from start to end.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You might be able to get away with editing the fuel & ignition maps (and most other normal tables and scalars) in the Stagea image using the R34 address file, because I've been doing essentially that myself over the last few days. Load up the Stagea address file, then the bin file for what's in my ECU, then an R34 bin as comparison, and looking to see where the differences are. As you'd expect, the two ECUs are essentially the same. Same ECU, same engine. Just a few differences in the ABS/TCS department.

But....because you can do that, it might be very easy for the tuner to use an R34 address file, load up an R34 bin file, then sync from the ECU and or/ sync to the ECU and perhaps cause havoc. Just because there are some differences.

Yeh well when Matt reprogrammed my board with the Stagea image, he was able to upload my current tune so I could just plug it back in and it was like nothing had changed. Except the misfire at about 5000rpm from the ECU pulling timing was gone.

But if the message hasn't been passed onto my tuner and he is trying to start with the R34 address file and then sync the bin file from the ECU, it wouldn't work as you said. But then I have no idea what he meant when he said it looks like it has earthed out, so I'm not sure.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This assembly should have some effects, With the device engaged the turbo gains faster response how ever the engine pins up top, with it disengaged the motor picks up 8 degrees of timing up top but loses big chunk of power band down low. So I want it to be engaged till about 20psi then slowly released after that point to gain the top end timing. That way we should have fat power band from start to end.

Your the man stao!

I'm keen to seen how this turns out. I have 2 friends who just acquired RB25s and hopefully will be looking for killer upgrades in time for production on these.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hello, ive got a r33 s2 and wondering what is your best hi-flow turbo for response, only looking to make 220-250rwkw, stock internals with associated mods. Its a daily and would be looking to run between 10-14psi max.

cheers

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Standard high flow would be suitable for your applications. I'm generally seeing around 240rwkws with option, how ever I'm recently seening some 260rwkws results based on 15psi from Toshi's remaps using stock injectors, afm and ecu.

So for your goal, get the standard high flow, then pm toshi for ecu flash and that should archeive it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • This morning I carefully reinstalled the manifold and started looking at a couple of things I need to do.  Heat wrap arrived sometime today so I popped into the shed with the missus dishwashing gloves and started wrapping the first half of the dump and the screamer/plumb back.  Once I do the second half I'll be able to final fit the turbo and exhaust up.  Also pulled the harness out today and started terminating it at the ECU end. A connector is done, just need to run the remaining wires that arent in the harness - 12v, gnd and couple I/O
    • A31 is pretty much the same thing without HiAIDS I mean CAS, no improvement lol. Not to late to send it.
    • Thanks for all the replies! I also wanted to ask if wheels that were fitted on Ford Falcons would fit the 350GTs as well? In the area I'm at there aren't that many options for secondhand wheels and new ones here are way out of my budget. From what I've seen, most of the wheels that are available that were fitted on Ford Falcons have an offset of +33 to +36, with a centre bore of 70.5mm whereas the stock 350GT's ones are 66mm, can't seem to find any hubcentric rings that fit that difference though. 
    • 215/45/18 tyres are probably a little on the low side compared to the factory tyre, it should be closer to a 245/45/19, which will get you about an extra 11mm of height, and should make you speedo read a bit closer to reality. 245/45/19s will be a bit too far the other way and you risk a speeding ticket as your speedo might read slower than your actual speed.  245/40/19s would be correct if you are going to 19in rims, they will give you a similar total diameter to the 245/45/18 tyres.  
    • That's something I forgot to put in my list. The aggressive anti-squat in R32 is a f**king menace. I still need to decide if I'm going to drag the subframe out of my car and weld in the GKTech corrector kit. The main reason to dither is the need to switch to spherical joints in the lower arm to account for the twist induced in the rear pivot caused by lowering the front pivot. And yes...we do put better subframes in R32s, and I wish I'd gotten an S14 one instead of an A31 when I did the "take off and nuke it from orbit" HICAS delete all those years ago.
×
×
  • Create New...