Jump to content
SAU Community

Hypergear Turbochargers and High flow Services Development thread

hypergear

By hypergear,
in Forced Induction Performance

 Share

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 12.5k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Popular Posts

Lithium
Lithium

I was reading through the thread and was going to weigh in anyway, though looks like you're very much on the page I am reading from - so I'll +1 with with a bit more anecdotal evidence to support it

hypergear
hypergear

The ATR28SS15 would be a perfect turbo for your application. I didn't look into some thing even smaller as it doesn't make that much of a difference in response but did loses quite a lot of power. I'

Dose Pipe Sutututu
Dose Pipe Sutututu

^ lol... maybe I'll use a 3" intake pipe and add in more bends.. that usually gets the suuuuuuuuuuuuuuuutuuututuutut going LOL. Anyhow, some real world facts to back up the results.. errbody likes ti

Posted Images

hypergear Grand Master

hypergear

Posted
  • Author
Posted

This is a SS1 none PU version. It maxes around 250rwkws with same response as a factory turbo, it never worked on this stegea. So I'm happy to have it upgraded to other series at no additional cost.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Hanaldo Grand Master

Hanaldo

Posted
Posted

This is a SS1 none PU version. It maxes around 250rwkws with same response as a factory turbo, it never worked on this stegea. So I'm happy to have it upgraded to other series at no additional cost.

30rwkw isn't far short, especially considering not many of your customers turbos equal what your test car makes. If you could figure out why it isn't holding boost then I think it would come a lot closer.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
hypergear Grand Master

hypergear

Posted
  • Author
Posted

30rwkw isn't far short, especially considering not many of your customers turbos equal what your test car makes. If you could figure out why it isn't holding boost then I think it would come a lot closer.

No the average of 250rwkws was taken from 3x different cars. they all run up to about 17.5PSI top end, they were 253, 247 and 245. The final afr is all about 12. The best run of 260rwkws was on 23psi.

I couldn't figure out why its not holding boost on his car. I guess its better to exchange for a SS1PU or G2 a G3 which results are well proven by many people.

Or I can exchange with some thing that comes straight out of my car like the G2 I've done for your self and we ended up with same power.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Hanaldo Grand Master

Hanaldo

Posted
Posted

No the average of 250rwkws was taken from 3x different cars. they all run up to about 17.5PSI top end, they were 253, 247 and 245. But the afr is all about 12. The best run of 260rwkws was on 23psi.

I couldn't figure out why its not holding boost on his car. I guess its better to exchange for a SS1PU or G2 a G3 which results are well proven by many people.

I see, but still not far off.

Thing is, what if the turbo isn't the issue? What happens if whatever replacement turbo you send him then doesn't make power? Doesn't look good.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
hypergear Grand Master

hypergear

Posted
  • Author
Posted

The turbo it self is bit on the small side as it was only made to do a maximum of 250rwkws with factory response, and it was more responsive then a stock turbo. During that time the FNT housings and billet wheels wasn't developed.

Since he's got forged engine, so its no differ to mine, it doesn't hurt to go bigger and bigger is more consistent with power and boost control.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
lilcrash Veteran

lilcrash

Posted
Posted

The strangest thing I noticed is we couldn't get it up to 20psi, the higher reading was at 16psi down to 14psi, he said there was a massive heat soak and the timing was just going ridiculous. On e85 he thinks it could make 250.

For the time being I can't afford another tune, my rego is due, so I can't really change the turbo right now. As much as I would love to.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Mitcho_7 Mentor

Mitcho_7

Posted
Posted (edited)

here is my dyno graph from yesterday. The car is a 96 r33 gtst and has the op6 standard hi flow, nismo 555cc injectors, nismo fuel pump, blitz turnflow cooler (heat wrapped pipes), full 3" exhaust and a metal intake. Real happy with the result, thanks Jez!

dynograph.jpg

Edited by Mitcho_7
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Birds Grand Master

Birds

Posted
Posted

Looks like a good clean tune, should run really smooth. Can definitely see the difference between the standard highflow and the SS1PU.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Mitcho_7 Mentor

Mitcho_7

Posted
Posted (edited)

Yeh the ss turbo's build boost faster but can't seem to hold it as well uptop. I had one of staos wastegate mods on initially but the boost wouldn't go below 20+ psi...

Edited by Mitcho_7
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Manuel Kasko Grand Master

Manuel Kasko

Posted
Posted

Glad ur happy Mitch. If i go to shop later i will overlay ur graph with Kasko's and post it up.

Would love to see this as the ss is $700 more expensive.

Question Jez even if mine could hold the 20 psi through the whole rev range it would still be limited by the detonation above 250kw?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
DVS JEZ Grand Master

DVS JEZ

Posted
Posted

Yes it should make more power. Fuel octane is always an issue when trying to push bigger numbers from a smallish turbo, Say if u had a G3 u can run more power with more boost before u hit the knock limit.

I think due to the turbo design being for as best response as possible the top end has to suffer as it chokes up in the rear housing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Manuel Kasko Grand Master

Manuel Kasko

Posted
Posted

That's cool I'm really happy with the response so I don't want to lower that just for a gain in power.

Maybe once I get bored of the power bit I doubt that would happen any time soon.

Even with the clutch still not replaced I managed to break traction all the way to 3rd gear last night.

Let's just say I won

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • GoHashiriya
      ER34 AT ECU and HKS SLD pins

      By GoHashiriya · Posted

      Hi all, I need to get this HKS SLD attached to my stock ECU because I've now got the German autobahn and faster European circuits to contend with.  The car is a manual 2dr ER34 with an AT ECU and I've realised the AT ECU has two pins for speed sensor signals: Pin 29: Vehicle speed sensor signal (Vehicle speed sensor 2) Pin *58: Output shaft rotation sensor signal (Vehicle speed sensor 1) - *RB25DET A/T model only Before I go butchering this harness, is anyone sure of which pin is the correct one for signal adjustment? The attached document from HKS indicates pin 29 but I found this situation mentioned in the following thread on a different forum (R34 GTT Auto Trans Speed Cut Problem | Zerotohundred) mentioning pin 58 needing to be altered by member zephuros, albeit it seems to be for an RSM-GP and the info appears to be old.  R34_All_Workshop_Manual-pages-2.pdf R34_All_Workshop_Manual-pages-3.pdf R34_All_Workshop_Manual-pages-1.pdf HKS SLD Vehicle Pin out P59-P70 ER34-pages.pdf
    • Daleo
      Exemplary Сasual Dating - Real Women

      By Daleo · Posted

      Embrace the freedom of casual encounters on the best dating app in town! Verified Maidens Superlative Сasual Dating
    • dyl33
      Creative in cabin amp locations

      By dyl33 · Posted

      Slimline sub on the rear parcel shelf is doable. Pioneer TS-WX140DA is only 70mm high.   
    • GTSBoy
      Rear suspension upgrades

      By GTSBoy · Posted

      People like Johnny Dose Bro might be laughing at my post because I accidentally added 100mm to my numbers. 350-355 is indeed the lower limit. 450 is off-road Skyline spec.
    • GTSBoy
      Pillowball/Hardened Runner Hybrid Approach

      By GTSBoy · Posted

      What is the "compromise" that you think will happen? Are you thinking that something will get damaged? The only things you have to be concerned about with spherical jointed suspension arms are; Arguments with the constabulary wrt their legality (they are likely to be illegal for road use without an engineering certificatation, and that may not be possible to obtain). A lot more NVH transmitted through to the passengers (which is hardly a concern for those with a preference for good handling, anyway). Greatly increased inspection and maintenance requirements (see above points, both).   It is extremely necessary to ask what car you are talking about. Your discussion on strut tops, for example, would be completely wrong for an R chassis, but be correct for an S chassis. R32s have specific problems that R33/4 do not have. Etc. I have hardened rubber bushes on upper rear control arms and traction rods. Adjustable length so as to be able to set both camber and bump steer. You cannot contemplate doing just the control arms and not the traction arms. And whatever bushing you have in one you should have in the other so that they have similar characteristics. Otherwise you can get increased oddness of behaviour as one bushing flexes and the other doesn't, changing the alignment between them. I have stock lower rear arms with urethane bushes. I may make changes here, these are are driven by the R32's geometry problems, so I won't discuss them here unless it proves necessary. I have spherical joints in the front caster rods. I have experienced absolutely no negatives and only positives from doing so. They are massively better than any other option. I have sphericals in the FUCAs, but this is driven largely by the (again) R32 specific problems with the motion of those arms. I just have to deal with the increased maintenance required. Given how much better the front end behaves with the sphericals in there.....I'd probably be tempted to go away from my preference (which is not to have sphericals on a road car, for 2 of the 3 reasons in the bulleted list above), just to gain those improvements. And so my preference for not using sphericals (in general) on a road car should be obvious. I use them judiciously, though, as required to solve particular problems.
×
×
  • Create New...