Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Craig don't you have the Haltech installed? Is it the PS2000?

Had a Haltech Platnum series.....go rid of it a long time ago!

Now have a Nismo piggybacked with and E-Manage Ultimate......I have bugger all low end restrictions with throttle or Cam's......as seen first hand by PN-Mad both in 2WD and 4WD!

Had a Haltech Platnum series.....go rid of it a long time ago!

Now have a Nismo piggybacked with and E-Manage Ultimate......I have bugger all low end restrictions with throttle or Cam's......as seen first hand by PN-Mad both in 2WD and 4WD!

Ahh ok...I think the Etuner's site has your car there listed with haltech....that's why I asked

Had a Haltech Platnum series.....go rid of it a long time ago!

Now have a Nismo piggybacked with and E-Manage Ultimate......I have bugger all low end restrictions with throttle or Cam's......as seen first hand by PN-Mad both in 2WD and 4WD!

i still cant get over this.. mines still yuck on take off lol..

i wanna see it happen in Video form!

I had the Impul on by itself......I also had just put on the suction pipe and the fabricators had not followed my instructions correctly so I had a slight over boosting problem and as the Impul has no restrictions it helped me to melt a cylinder.

Never had a PS2000 on my car!

Ironpaw where is this Etuners site you speak of....I might have to go and update it a little!huh.gif

.....and if I remember correctly OZ is punching bigger numbers than Japan with the E-manage ultimate with a VQ25det!

You don't remember correctly.

450awps (331awkw) has been done in a street registered NM35 in Japan.

Scott isn't there yet... at least not until the new turbo is installed (if it ever fkn arrives!!).

Having said that, all the "big number" NM35's in Japan have had their capacity increased to over 3L.

Much more impressed with the 2.5L numbers Aus is producing!

i still cant get over this.. mines still yuck on take off lol..

i wanna see it happen in Video form!

I need to find someone stupid enough to sit in the car with me and film:P....where Andy when I need him...lol!....I wont do it again until the shift kit goes in either!.....then I might have to do a quarter run!

Edited by Jetwreck

So with the throttle restrictions; can someone with a stock ecu & an informeter tell me what they get as an output from the "Throttle %" if they flatten the accelerator from a stationary position? Does that corroborate the restriction or is it 'futher' along the line?

You don't remember correctly.

450awps (331awkw) has been done in a street registered NM35 in Japan.

Scott isn't there yet... at least not until the new turbo is installed (if it ever fkn arrives!!).

Having said that, all the "big number" NM35's in Japan have had their capacity increased to over 3L.

Much more impressed with the 2.5L numbers Aus is producing!

Scott's will smash that on E85......shit I recon I'll get to that with a shift kit and 100 Octane and 20PSI and no F-Con Pro!

Scott's will smash that on E85......shit I recon I'll get to that with a shift kit and 100 Octane and 20PSI and no F-Con Pro!

Take a breath Craig.

That 450awps was on pump... and yes, I know Scott will smash that power level... and yes I know that with the old turbo, his car had very little lag.

Oh, I should mention that particular car wasn't using the Fcon V-Pro... it was using the iS.

So with the throttle restrictions; can someone with a stock ecu & an informeter tell me what they get as an output from the "Throttle %" if they flatten the accelerator from a stationary position? Does that corroborate the restriction or is it 'futher' along the line?

I ran a cable throttle and still had the same takeoff, the cams go into full retard below 35? Kph to negate the need for traction control and make the car nice and friendly do drive. I will have the stock cam mapping data soon when I install the Vmanage so I will let you know exactly what it does.

Take a breath Craig.

That 450awps was on pump... and yes, I know Scott will smash that power level... and yes I know that with the old turbo, his car had very little lag.

Oh, I should mention that particular car wasn't using the Fcon V-Pro... it was using the iS.

I'm breathing just fine buddy!

Hey did they post up the dyno sheet.....I remember seeing a couple but that was a while ago.......want to compare to Scott's and mine....cannot find in in my J a p browser for some reason!

So what's that advantage of the Fcon units?

Edited by Jetwreck

I ran a cable throttle and still had the same takeoff, the cams go into full retard below 35? Kph to negate the need for traction control and make the car nice and friendly do drive. I will have the stock cam mapping data soon when I install the Vmanage so I will let you know exactly what it does.

DO WANT THIS!!!

hurry up!!! before my reno funds dry up!! :ninja:

No dyno sheet unfortunately.

Both F-con's intercept the signal from the ECU to the engine and modify it as per the tune, but they are quite different.

Fcon iS is pretty much an eManage Ultimate + Vmanage, but with a Video output... and it looks pretty (not that you'd see it :P).

That being that it add's/subtracts to the OEM ECU's signals (timing, fuel etc etc).

The problem with this is that the stock ECU is damn clever and will react to the return signal accordingly.

(ie Ecu sends signal to engine, iS intercepts signal and adds a fixed number of degrees to the timing, signal returns from engine to stock ECU, ECU takes additional timing out to bring it in line with what the stock levels "should" be, iS intercepts and adds it's fixed number again - which is now less due to the reduction in timing in the "send" signal from the ECU).

I guess the trick here is to tune outside of the stock ECU's limits :)

Fcon V-Pro intercepts the OEM ECU signal and completely replaces the them with the "tuned" information, so regardless of what the stock ECU receives and adjusts for in the return signal, the V-Pro dictates the parameters in it's "base" tune to the Engine.

Edited by iamhe77

So with the throttle restrictions; can someone with a stock ecu & an informeter tell me what they get as an output from the "Throttle %" if they flatten the accelerator from a stationary position? Does that corroborate the restriction or is it 'futher' along the line?

I think it is 79%. If no one else weighs in to say differently l can plug it in & do a test. I do know that I can't get above 87%, ever.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • It would be different if the sealant hadn't started to peel up with gaps in the glue about ~6cm and bigger in some areas. I would much prefer not having to do the work take them off the car . However, the filler the owner put in the roof rack mount cavities has shrunk and begun to crack on the rail delete panels. I cant trust that to hold off moisture ingress especially where I live. Not only that but I have faded paint on as well as on either side of these panels, so they would need to come off to give the roofline a proper respray. My goal is to get in there and put a healthy amount of epoxy instead of panel filler/bog and potentially skin with carbon fiber. I have 2 spare rolls from an old motorcycle fairing project from a few years back and I think it'd be a nice touch on a black stag.  I've seen some threads where people replace their roof rack delete with a welded in sheet metal part. But has anyone re-worked the roof rails themselves? It seems like there is a lot of volume there to add in some threads and maybe a keyway for a quick(er) release roof rack system. Not afraid to mill something out if I have to. It would be cool to have a cross bar only setup. That way I can keep the sleek roofline that would accept a couple bolts to gain back that extra utility  3D print some snazzy covers to hide the threaded section to be thorough and keep things covered when not using the rack. 
    • Probably not. A workshop grade scantool is my go to for proper Consult interrogation. Any workshop grade tool should do it. Just go to a workshop.
    • In my head it does make sense to be a fuel problem since that is what I touched when cleaning the system. When I was testing with the fuel pressure gauge, the pressure was constantly 2.5 bar with the FPR vacuum removed. When stalling, the pressure was going up to 3.0 bar (which is how it should be on ignition).
    • ECUtalk pages don't mention they support the ABS computer (consult port has more than one CAN), so you might just need a different scan tool. But, I would expect ABS is a different light to the brake warning/handbrake light, do you see an ABS light come on for a few seconds when you turn the key from ACC to IGN? But since you said: I'd have a look at the ABS sensors in the rear hubs to make sure they are not damaged, disconnected etc.
    • OK, if it idles at 1000+ with the AAC, its not an idle airflow problem. The cold start valve just gives extra air when the engine is cold, but you have enough air without it to idle at 1000. I think you are back to a fuel problem, sorry. Can you see the fuel pressure staying constant or does it drop as the revs drop to a stall?  
×
×
  • Create New...