Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I have finally managed to track one of these real Gt3076R's down 700382-12 or 700382-5012

For peoples reference

GCG $2195 available around the 9th June

MTQ qld $2066 available around August

Slide $1775 in stock but is not the anti surge compressor inlet. (Not the real gt3076)

Capa $1375 with no rear housing. No stock.

Rear IW .82 housing ATP delivered $620 or Garret Aust for $680-780

Another Brisbane supplier who I have order thru. Getting assemble tomorrow $1800

Once they have supplied me the correct turbo I will let you know who they are.

They have great pricing online compared to others.

All plus actuator and bracket $150-180.

  • Replies 52
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

How confusing.

Is it worth kicking up a stink for the correct spec 3076 with port shrouded cover? Or not worth my trouble?

Check out ATPturbo.com home page , scroll right down and look at the GT3076R-WG

0.70 comp 52 Trim 0.86 rear

You may have this configuration, sounds like a pretty damn good street turbo. Quick spool 500 hp .

Check out ATPturbo.com home page , scroll right down and look at the GT3076R-WG

0.70 comp 52 Trim 0.86 rear

You may have this configuration, sounds like a pretty damn good street turbo. Quick spool 500 hp .

That one looks like it has the T2 rear.

fkn confusing shit!

That looks like it though, except I don't have that rear housing...

GT3076R-WG_top.jpg

I have this rear housing

internally_wastegated.jpg

It seems to me the only differences are the 7 T04S blades instead of the 6, and no ported front...

Also, ID tag says 700177-5018

And a simple Google search of "Garrett 700177-5018" lead to this link http://www.turbofast.com.au/GTseries.html which indicates it is a GT30 family turbocharger that uses a TO4S compressor (7 blades). That makes it a GT3076R

There's really no science to those searches and you'd have found out long ago what your specs actually are.

All that aside, do you actually have it fitted and running, and if so what do you think about it? Those specs support same/similar flow capacity as the 6 bladed GT3037R so I'm interested to hear how it goes in service.

Hi people. Just a question to all you guys that have done this upgrade. What is generally used on the intake side of things as far as connecting the standard pipe to the turbo. Is some sort of fabrication required or is there an actual correct size intake pipe that can be purchased. Im asking because i've generally not seen it mentioned when people post about these upgrades. All the people i've asked dont know? If there is a correct pipe for this application where should i purchase from and rough estimations on price would be very helpful. Thank's guy's ;)

Regardless of what specs state the T04S 7 blade GT3076r is a crappy thing. The -12 is what you want; if you can't then its either the 3071r or the 3082r.

The GT3071's tend to make power easier than them. :S

Edited by SLAPS
And a simple Google search of "Garrett 700177-5018" lead to this link http://www.turbofast.com.au/GTseries.html which indicates it is a GT30 family turbocharger that uses a TO4S compressor (7 blades). That makes it a GT3076R

There's really no science to those searches and you'd have found out long ago what your specs actually are.

All that aside, do you actually have it fitted and running, and if so what do you think about it? Those specs support same/similar flow capacity as the 6 bladed GT3037R so I'm interested to hear how it goes in service.

Yeah me too Doof..

It seems, within the posts, heaps of blokes didn't and still don't even know if they have the TO4S Comp cover and 7 blade wheel instead of the genuine Garrett GT3076R.

Hey, if it's a good package, then tell us.

Please , post your results ASAP, we gotta keep this thread alive, and kicking.

If you ask me, spending $2K plus on a turbo, and getting something else, it's a blatent rip off.

Imagine if you walked into Hugo Boss for a leather jacket and found out it was made in Bali.

Same thing here man.

  • 1 month later...

This is a good example of why Garrets and HKS's turbo description systems fall down , the figures given are not always exacting probably in the interests of simplicity .

Specific to the GT3037 and GT3076R turbo group .

Firstly to HKS , in long figure form it probably should have been called GT30GT37 because what they mean is a GT30 turbine with a GT37 compressor , the only real differences in the HKS marketed GT3037's is the compressor trim and since they are all GT37 compressors the same handle applies .

The Garrett system is slightly different because their terminology - GT3076R - means GT30 turbine with 76mm OD compressor .

If all they used was "76"mm OD GT37 compressor wheels there wouldn't be a problem but they don't do they ...

For reasons known best to themselves they market "GT3076R's" with an earlier tech T series compressor - the one with the higher blade count ie 7/7 rather than 6/6 . Full height blades/splitter blades .

What it comes down to in the end is the part numbers on the turbos ID tag . Mostly but not always they have a cartridge or CHRA number and for a GT30 turbine based ball bearing one it will be 700177 series . The prefix or dash (- xxxx) after the 700177 tells you precisely the compressor wheel options and any mods to the turbine itself ie cropping or grinding down from 60mm to 56.6 .

700177-7 or -5007 is the CHRA number for the real or all GT wheel spec GT3037/GT3076R in 56 comp trim .

Basically if it doesn't say -5 or -6 or -7 (5005 5006 5007) it hasn't got the GT37 compressor on it .

If you wants what I call the real GT3037 or GT3076R then it has to have a GT series compressor to be a matching set with the GT series turbine .

I look at it like this , GT compressor for GT turbine and T series compressor for T series turbine . Left shoe for left foot and so on .

At the end of the day the only thing that's significantly different between a GT3037S 56T and a real GT3076R is the turbine housing , a HKS one on the 3037 and a Garrett one on the 3076R .

True the HKS has the bell mouthed insert in the comp cover but I think that's of little consequence unless you are running these turbos to the absolute limit and getting every last 1% out of them - with the largest proper respective turbine housing available .

Cheers A .

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Have a look at that (shitty) pic I posted. You can see AN -4 braided line coming to a -4 to 1/8 BSPT adapter, into a 1/8 BSPT T piece. The Haltech pressure sender is screwed into the long arm of the sender and factory sender (pre your pic) into the T side. You can also see the cable tie holding the whole contraption in place. Is it better than mounting the sender direct to your engine fitting......yes because it removes that vibration as the engine revs out 50 times every lap and that factory sender is pretty big. Is it necessary for you......well I've got no idea, I just don't like something important failing twice so over-engineer it to the moon!
    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
×
×
  • Create New...