Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey guys,

I was just wondering if anyone round here has a 300GT or 250GT V35. Reason I'm asking is that they're Dierct Injection and like most direct injection cars on the market (including my stagea) they may be in the process of or already on the way to fish town.

So I have been hearing a few complaints recently concerning 'Gasoline Direct Injection' engines, particularly concerning vehicles from Toyota, Mitsubishi and Nissan. GDI has become rather popular in late model cars recently, notably the Mitsy 'GDI' and Nissan 'NEO Di' which seem to be the most prolific of the GDI vehicles, european examples are the VW 'FSI' system and also Opels new GDI system which is now widely used on late model vehicles without advertisemsnt. Now the complaints are mostly concerning poor fuel economy and multiple sensor failure with expensive repairs.

This is strange because amongst a notable increase in power over similarly designed SFI (sequential injection) and Multi point injection motors, GDI motors usually have a rather impressive factory fuel consumption rating which makes them rather attractive to buyers. These buyers are often disappointed when they get to the pump with their new car only to find that it's been sucking fuel like a v8.

It is rather hard to find information on why these NEW cars are costing so much to maintain and using more gas than expected, the funny thing is that performance also drops rapidly as the fuel consumption rises.

Instead of providing an explanation, car companies remain tight lipped and owners get fed up with mechanic bills.

So given the listed issues:

-Poor fuel economy.

-Decreased performance.

-Injector and sensor failure.

What is going on?

What seems to be a constant in all examples is that problems start occurring once the vehicle millage passes 60,000Km. I discovered this while trying to research information on the VQ30DD motor in my Nissan, all the info I could find was in Japanese, but I did find the above information relating to GDI vehicles in general and also from personal accounts of friends with GDI vehicles. So I thought that since my car was GDI and was also passed that 60,000Km milestone, then it must be showing signs of whatever ailment has been plaguing other GDI motors.

I thought that since the difference between GDI and MPFI motors was on the induction side, I would start there. It didn't take long to find the culprit, in fact as soon as I opened the intake manifold it was all too obvious.... SOOT everywhere! it was like black snow coating everything from the port side of the throttle butterfly to the valves, it was 1mm thick in places and not unlike the oil residue found inside the crank case of an old 2stroke lawn mower. This was a shock and totally not on for a car that was other wise in 'as new' condition, it took a can of degreaser and a water blaster to get the manifold back to 'as cast' condition, I then set about looking for the cause.

The cause too was rather obvious, modern engines are being fitted with any manner of emission reducing gadgets, the most popular being the classic rocker cover vent breather and the horrible EGR or 'exhaust gas recirculation' system, both of these are designed to 're-burn' oil vapour and un-burnt fuel that would otherwise be vented into the atmosphere. When used in conjunction, the EGR and rocker cover vent supply both dense and water rich fuel soot and oil vapor back into the intake where they mix to create that lovely sooty crud, most of which goes back into the engine harmlessly as it's supposed to do, but much of it winds up stuck to the walls of the intake.

Now in a normal SFI MPFI (sequential, multi point fuel injection) fuel is injected into the intake piping right behind the valves, 'Sequential' systems are designed to only inject when the valves are open, but there is still deflection and fuel vapor ends up joining the EGR and Rocker cover emissions back up in the intake, this is good because the fuel mixes with the vapors, dissolving deposits and making them less likely to settle.

Of course since GDI engine injectors are inside the combustion chamber, on the other side of the valves, this means that there is nothing to stop the buildup of deposits, hence the GDI intake becomes more and more choked until the motor starts running rich and eventually large chunks of 'crud' become dislodged and end up passing the valves and become the proverbial 'spanner in the works' and this stuff does buildup into rather hard little lumps in places which wreak havoc on O2 sensors and injector nozzels.

There you have it, the cause of our problems, since the car companies dont care about cars out side of their warranties, car owners are left scratching their heads and local mechanics keep this to themselves because business is booming!

The only solution is, as soon as you notice your new ride becoming more thirsty, find a friend who knows motors relatively well or talk to your mechanic and ask them to check your intake once every 20,000Km or so as a standard servicing procedure. My car was not noticeably less powerful but it was using a little more juice than expected, hence my adventure into crud city.

If you don't want to pay extra for an intake clean on every second service, there is a way of making your GDI vehicle crud free for life!

Have a catch can installed on your rocker cover breather, this is a tank or 'can' installed in the line linking the rocker cover to the intake, vapors passing through the tank settle and this is where the oil deposits remain, leaving only clean dry air to enter your intake. In many cases this will only reduce the buildup slightly as there is still the deposits from the EGR valve, to fix this, I found an old exhaust manifold gasket and trimmed it down to fit the EGR pipe flange so replacing the original gasket seal, this creates a 'blanking plate' that effectively prevents the EGR from functioning but allows you to leave the EGR plugged in so that the ECU doesn't pick up any errors. These procedures will keep your intake crud free for life and will only slightly affect your vehicle emissions, the extra emissions produced by removing your EGR valve will be offset by the fact that your car will now run cleanly and efficiently without sucking down loads of fuel and smoking as the engine over fuels due to reduced breathing.

A friends Mitsubishi 2000cc RVR was using 16L/100Km on average, the intake looked like a smoker's lungs when I got it off, the original 45mm intake was nowhere near that in diameter due crud, go figure.

there are carbon cleaning services (via mechanical workshops) that perform what ill call 'non-invasive' carbon clean outs. i think they flush the injectors with a fluid, and also a cleaning agent into the intake piping to remove all the oil build up there, and also in the combustion chamber. im not sure how effective it is, but people have had performance increases (probably close to factory) and increased fuel economy.

i dont know how well it would fare with Di motors, but i guess oil/carbon build-ups are the same in pretty much all motors.

im surprised to see EGR on a fairly recent motor like yours. i thought they stopped using it in the 90s when 3-way cats became more cost effective and fuel management was better?

as for crank case ventilation, its sucks that ALL motors suffer from this necessary evil.

That sounds like a good idea, in the US they sell Direct injection cleaning kits with a spray for the manifold and a fuel additive.

As far as the crank case vent, I'm going to install a catch can to take care of that.

ahh yes ive seen after market kits for this purpose, i think you stick the brake master cylinder vacuum hose into a bottle of fluid (i think even water will work) and that is sucked into the intake, i guess it vaporises and takes all the crap with it to be burnt. and the fuel additive would take care of the injectors.

i wonder how effective this option is?

and yup, catch can FTW! :P

I think you will also likely find that on cold mornings the car will run a lot more smoothly on startup, at least a previous car of mine did when the recycling was taken out of the equation. I'm guessing less fuel is burnt while the engine is getting up to normal operating temperature and the engine management doesn't take into account what is getting recycled and put less fuel in as a result, meaning normally the engine gets too much fuel until it is up to normal temp.

the engine will run rich on a cold start anyway, they are programmed to do that. getting it up to temp as fast as possible (for emissions reasons) but its not severe compared to the 'normal' map

  • 4 months later...

Sorry for bringing this thread back to life but I've stumbled onto a winner for all owners of Direct Injected Nissans!

'Subaru Upper Engine Cleaner' you heard me, effectively it's the stuff that was mentioned previously, it gets sprayed into the intake as the car is running and it removes ALL carbon buildup and varnishing from the intake manifold, valves and combustion chamber.

Cans of this stuff is supplied with new Subaru service kits as a reccomended service item. All Subaru dealerships in Australia and NZ hold stocks of this stuff and it'll cost about $20 per can give or take a couple of squid.

It's designed to take the intake tract of the motor back as close as possible to how it was when it rolled out of the factory. Probably not reccomended for HIGH millage cars in which case the carbon deposits are the only barrier stoppng the rings from passing oil.

Well I'm doing the :) dance.

That subaru stuff is basically the same as what the yanks call "sea foam". Do some googling it could be interesting.

FYI i tried it on a 350,000+ KM honda civic (original motor) and it made a noticable difference. Better idle and seemed to accellerate with more smoothness, perhaps even gained a little power down low.

Also tried it on a 60,000 KM 2JZGTE and it was a waste of time.

Uhm, someone able to clarify:

Will carby cleaner do the same as the subaru upper engine cleaner... i've known about the sub. upper cleaner for years but when i first bought my V and my mech was changing the spark plugs, he noticed the intake was coated in a film of oil, so he used a bit of carby cleaner.. engine was indeed smoother afterwards etc.

I've used the carby cleaner afterwards myself a couple of times and it's worked a treat.

I think the difference between the Carb cleaner and the Poobaru cleaner is that you dont need to disassemble too much to use the latter. Just spray it in the intake with the air filter removed while the cars running.Carb cleaner is more of a strip the intake and clean each part deal. (I did this last service, it was most average and took a couple of hours)

Edited by chad bob
Would this Subaru stuff fix fouled injectors?

You would be better off removing the injectors and having them professionally cleaned. Not that expensive and they'll flow test them so you know you're putting back good gear.

  • 6 months later...
^ What he said, I had it done, only costs $20 per injector usually.

I know this is a very old thread, but hoping you're still monitoring this Chad Bob. I saw your similar post re; Nissan Di motors at europort.org.nz a few weeks ago, soon after my 2006 RX250 FOUR M35 was on it's way to NZ. It sure put a dampener on things. My car has landed, has 84K on the clock and runs very well at this stage. This weekend, I opened the throttle butterfly, and sure enough, I could see a coating of around 1mm of black death from there in. I guess I should let loose some Subaru upper cycling cleaner. How many bottles do I need? Do you recommend 1/3 in the petrol tank, 1/3 in the crank case, and 1/3 in the brake booster vacuum line as someone on Youtube mentioned? Sorry I couldn't PM you. I need something like 10 posts before I can do that.

Hi Spong,

As a bit of an update I have completed 26,000 trouble free Kilometers in my VQ30DD Stagea. As you have just received the car, I would recommend pulling down the intake, removing the big plenum and giving it a good water blast on the driveway, the rest of the gunk can be cleaned off with brake and parts cleaner. I say this because there will be a lot of buildup at this stage if it has not been addressed offshore (unlikely). When you put the intake back together, try to put together a blank off plate for the EGR valve (metal pipe coming from intake just past throttle), it's rather simple, just two holes, I used an old exhaust gasket that I had lying around, this should slow down or prevent the buildup from occuring in the future, it'll throw a check engine light but I ignore this or reset the ECU and it stays off for a month or so.

I have made a habit of pulling the lid off of the plenum once every two service intervals just for a checkup, but so far the gunk has not returned.

Regarding the Subaru upper engine cleaner, there are instructions on the can, follow them and you'll be fine. I'm not sure how well this worked as I did not open the plenum after application.

So this issue isn't really the bugbear that the mechanics get worked up about, the intake is a doddle to remove and the rest is common sense.

Edited by chad bob
Hi Spong,

As a bit of an update I have completed 26,000 trouble free Kilometers in my VQ30DD Stagea. As you have just received the car, I would recommend pulling down the intake, removing the big plenum and giving it a good water blast on the driveway, the rest of the gunk can be cleaned off with brake and parts cleaner. I say this because there will be a lot of buildup at this stage if it has not been addressed offshore (unlikely). When you put the intake back together, try to put together a blank off plate for the EGR valve (metal pipe coming from intake just past throttle), it's rather simple, just two holes, I used an old exhaust gasket that I had lying around, this should slow down or prevent the buildup from occuring in the future, it'll throw a check engine light but I ignore this or reset the ECU and it stays off for a month or so.

I have made a habit of pulling the lid off of the plenum once every two service intervals just for a checkup, but so far the gunk has not returned.

Regarding the Subaru upper engine cleaner, there are instructions on the can, follow them and you'll be fine. I'm not sure how well this worked as I did not open the plenum after application.

So this issue isn't really the bugbear that the mechanics get worked up about, the intake is a doddle to remove and the rest is common sense.

Hey Chad Bob, thanks for the update. I've also just got my stag, a 300RX.... and now a can of Sub U.E.C. so I'll be sure to give it a good going over (when the rain stops). Good to hear you've been 26k without probs.

Hey Chad Bob, thanks for the update. I've also just got my stag, a 300RX.... and now a can of Sub U.E.C. so I'll be sure to give it a good going over (when the rain stops). Good to hear you've been 26k without probs.

I pulled off the engine cover and used the vacuum hose on the left of the plenum (master cylinder side not intake side) I thought this hose would be the most direct for getting the cleaner into the turbulent air.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • OK, so again it has been a bit of a break but it was around researching what had been done since I didn't have access to Neil's records and not everything is obvious without pulling stuff apart. Happily the guy who assembled the engine had kept reasonable records, so we now know the final spec is: Bottom end: Standard block and crank Ross 86.5mm forgies, 9:1 compression Spool forged rods Standard main bolts Oil pump Spool billet gears in standard housing Aeroflow extended and baffled sump Head Freshly rebuilt standard head with new 80lb valve springs Mild porting/port match Head oil feed restrictor VCT disabled Tighe 805C reground cams (255 duration, 8.93 lift)  Adjustable cam gears on inlet/exhaust Standard head bolts, gasket not confirmed but assumed MLS External 555cc Nismo injectors Z32 AFM Bosch 023 Intank fuel pump Garret 2871 (factory housings and manifold) Hypertune FFP plenum with standard throttle   Time to book in a trip to Unigroup
    • I forgot about my shiny new plates!
    • Well, apparently they do fit, however this wont be a problem if not because the car will be stationary while i do the suspension work. I was just going to use the 16's to roll the old girl around if I needed to. I just need to get the E90 back on the road first. Yes! I'm a believer! 🙌 So, I contacted them because the site kinda sucks and I was really confused about what I'd need. They put together a package for me and because I was spraying all the seat surfaces and not doing spot fixes I decided not to send them a headrest to colour match, I just used their colour on file (and it was spot on).  I got some heavy duty cleaner, 1L of colour, a small bottle of dye hardener and a small bottle of the dye top coat. I also got a spray gun as I needed a larger nozzle than the gun I had and it was only $40 extra. From memory the total was ~$450 ish. Its not cheap but the result is awesome. They did add repair bits and pieces to the quote originally and the cost came down significantly when I said I didn't need any repair products. I did it over a weekend. The only issues I had were my own; I forgot to mix the hardener into the dye two coats but I had enough dye for 2 more coats with the hardener. I also just used up all the dye because why not and i rushed the last coat which gave me some runs. Thankfully the runs are under the headrests. The gun pattern wasn't great, very round and would have been better if it was a line. It made it a little tricky to get consistent coverage and I think having done the extra coats probably helped conceal any coverage issues. I contacted them again a few months later so I could get our X5 done (who the f**k thought white leather was a good idea for a family car?!) and they said they had some training to do in Sydney and I could get a reduced rate on the leather fix in the X5 if I let them demo their product on our car. So I agreed. When I took Bec in the E39 to pick it up, I showed them the job I'd done in my car and they were all (students included) really impressed. Note that they said the runs I created could be fixed easily at the time with a brush or an air compressor gun. So, now with the two cars done I can absolutely recommend Colourlock.  I'll take pics of both interiors and create a new thread.
    • Power is fed to the ECU when the ignition switch is switched to IGN, at terminal 58. That same wire also connects to the ECCS relay to provide both the coil power and the contact side. When the ECU sees power at 58 it switches 16 to earth, which pulls the ECCS relay on, which feeds main power into the ECU and also to a bunch of other things. None of this is directly involved in the fuel pump - it just has to happen first. The ECU will pull terminal 18 to earth when it wants the fuel pump to run. This allows the fuel pump relay to pull in, which switches power on into the rest of the fuel pump control equipment. The fuel pump control regulator is controlled from terminal 104 on the ECU and is switched high or low depending on whether the ECU thinks the pump needs to run high or low. (I don't know which way around that is, and it really doesn't matter right now). The fuel pump control reg is really just a resistor that controls how the power through the pump goes to earth. Either straight to earth, or via the resistor. This part doesn't matter much to us today. The power to the fuel pump relay comes from one of the switched wires from the IGN switch and fusebox that is not shown off to the left of this page. That power runs the fuel pump relay coil and a number of other engine peripherals. Those peripherals don't really matter. All that matters is that there should be power available at the relay when the key is in the right position. At least - I think it's switched. If it's not switched, then power will be there all the time. Either way, if you don't have power there when you need it (ie, key on) then it won't work. The input-output switching side of the relay gains its power from a line similar (but not the same as) the one that feeds the ECU. SO I presume that is switched. Again, if there is not power there when you need it, then you have to look upstream. And... the upshot of all that? There is no "ground" at the fuel pump relay. Where you say: and say that pin 1 Black/Pink is ground, that is not true. The ECU trigger is AF73, is black/pink, and is the "ground". When the ECU says it is. The Blue/White wire is the "constant" 12V to power the relay's coil. And when I say "constant", I mean it may well only be on when the key is on. As I said above. So, when the ECU says not to be running the pump (which is any time after about 3s of switching on, with no crank signal or engine speed yet), then you should see 12V at both 1 and 2. Because the 12V will be all the way up to the ECU terminal 18, waiting to be switched to ground. When the ECU switches the fuel pump on, then AF73 should go to ~0V, having been switched to ground and the voltage drop now occurring over the relay coil. 3 & 5 are easy. 5 is the other "constant" 12V, that may or may not be constant but will very much want to be there when the key is on. Same as above. 3 goes to the pump. There should never be 12V visible at 3 unless the relay is pulled in. As to where the immobiliser might have been spliced into all this.... It will either have to be on wire AF70 or AF71, whichever is most accessible near the alarm. Given that all those wires run from the engine bay fusebox or the ECU, via the driver's area to the rear of the car, it could really be either. AF70 will be the same colour from the appropriate fuse all the way to the pump. If it has been cut and is dangling, you should be able to see that  in that area somewhere. Same with AF71.   You really should be able to force the pump to run. Just jump 12V onto AF72 and it should go. That will prove that the pump itself is willing to go along with you when you sort out the upstream. You really should be able to force the fuel pump relay on. Just short AF73 to earth when the key is on. If the pump runs, then the relay is fine, and all the power up to both inputs on the relay is fine. If it doesn't run (and given that you checked the relay itself actually works) then one or both of AF70 and AF71 are not bringing power to the game.
    • @PranK can you elaborate further on the Colorlock Dye? The website has a lot of options. I'm sure you've done all the research. I have old genuine leather seats that I have bought various refurbing creams and such, but never a dye. Any info on how long it lasts? Does it wash out? Is it a hassle? What product do I actually need? Am I just buying this kit and following the steps the page advises or something else? https://www.colourlockaustralia.com.au/colourlock-leather-repair-kit-dye.html
×
×
  • Create New...